Is it immoral to think Madeleine was abducted and murdered?

[Wonderfulspam]

IMO you're living in cloud cuckoo land if you seriously believe there is "massive dissent".  Define "massive" - are we talking millions of active dissenters here?  In reality all that is left are a few dozen, possibly as many as a couple of hundred regular "dissenters", 99.99% of the world's population either accept that Madeleine was likely abducted, or have no opinion on it or have never heard of Madeleine McCann.   So, carry on "dissenting" you and your little cabal of dissenters, it won't make the blindest bit of difference in the grand scheme of things.

We'll have egg on our faces once Wolters reveals the concrete evidence.

[Mr Gray]

Despite their best efforts the parents and their followers have never managed to silence the dissent. Websites and individuals have been threatened with legal action, newspapers have been unable to allow comments on their stories and a lost libel action is still being presented as if it can still be won.

Which websites and which individuals have been threatened   with legal action.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Which websites and which individuals have been threatened   with legal action.

Whoever or whatever was threatened it clearly didn't work as there is apparently MASSIVE DISSENT 

[Wonderfulspam]

Which websites and which individuals have been threatened   with legal action.

On G-units behalf, she chooses not to tell you.
That's how things work around here now. Members can say anything they like & present no evidence to support it. That's the new forum rule you have created.

[G-Unit]

IMO you're living in cloud cuckoo land if you seriously believe there is "massive dissent".  Define "massive" - are we talking millions of active dissenters here?  In reality all that is left are a few dozen, possibly as many as a couple of hundred regular "dissenters", 99.99% of the world's population either accept that Madeleine was likely abducted, or have no opinion on it or have never heard of Madeleine McCann.   So, carry on "dissenting" you and your little cabal of dissenters, it won't make the blindest bit of difference in the grand scheme of things.

I don't have a cabal, but I think the word describes certain McCann supporters quite accurately. Compiling dossiers of those they accused of some kind of wrongdoing was, imo, a step too far; from interest to obsession.

[G-Unit]

Researching this case and the life of Christian B has been a lesson in the different ways in which someone's moral compass can be skewed.

“All things are subject to interpretation. Whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche

Btw;

“All things are subject to interpretation; whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not the truth.” Did Nietzsche really say this? Not quite. Popular culture has slightly misquoted. Instead, the philosopher said:

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't have a cabal, but I think the word describes certain McCann supporters quite accurately. Compiling dossiers of those they accused of some kind of wrongdoing was, imo, a step too far; from interest to obsession.

Whether you like it or not you are part of a "massive" lol cabal of dissenters.  We're talking dissenters who have taken obsession to a whole other level, making their dissent their life's work for the last 15 years, including dedicated websites, facebook pages, podcasts, youtube channels etc.  So a small handful of supporters compiled a dossier about these bizarre dissenters - well they should have been flattered at the attention IMO, to have their dissent recorded for posterity, instead they seemed a bit upset by it - I wonder why....?

[Brietta]

Despite their best efforts the parents and their followers have never managed to silence the dissent. Websites and individuals have been threatened with legal action, newspapers have been unable to allow comments on their stories and a lost libel action is still being presented as if it can still be won.

Doesn't that definitive synopsis of sceptic lore give you some food for thought?  I think it really should.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Btw;

“All things are subject to interpretation; whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not the truth.” Did Nietzsche really say this? Not quite. Popular culture has slightly misquoted. Instead, the philosopher said:

they're just different translations - meaning is always slightly altered and changed during translation, we know this from repeated examples in the files.  Perhaps you should have included the actual quote in German for us to argue over.

[Mr Gray]

Despite their best efforts the parents and their followers have never managed to silence the dissent. Websites and individuals have been threatened with legal action, newspapers have been unable to allow comments on their stories and a lost libel action is still being presented as if it can still be won.

The mccanns have a right not to be defamed and that's what you are criticising them for. You are only concerned with the rights of a convicted paedophile...rapist...typical sceptic

[G-Unit]

The mccanns have a right not to be defamed and that's what you are criticising them for. You are only concerned with the rights of a convicted paedophile...rapist...typical sceptic

Defamation - one of the McCanns and their supporters favourite words, despite the fact that in 15 years no-one has been found guilty of defaming them.

[Eleanor]

Defamation - one of the McCanns and their supporters favourite words, despite the fact that in 15 years no-one has been found guilty of defaming them.

What has this got to do with anything, let alone The Thread Title?

[Mr Gray]

Defamation - one of the McCanns and their supporters favourite words, despite the fact that in 15 years no-one has been found guilty of defaming them.

No one has been found guilty of abuse of CBs human rights..but you continually claim it

[Vertigo Swirl]

Defamation - one of the McCanns and their supporters favourite words, despite the fact that in 15 years no-one has been found guilty of defaming them.

Of course they have been defamed, Spam constantly accused them of murdering their own child on this very forum - what would you call that?

[Vertigo Swirl]

What has this got to do with anything, let alone The Thread Title?

None of this has got anything to do with the thread title but it seems despite repeatedly having our morals and integrity called into question by sceptics on this forum not one of them wants to explain exactly why our moral compass is supposedly faulty.