Author Topic: Madeleine McCann's parents lose libel case with the European Court of Human Rights  (Read 45545 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

  That's always a good one.  Presuming that you know what you are talking about.  Which you mostly don't.
I was in court about 4 weeks ago in a civil case as a defendant. Just me...the judge and a barrister for the plaintiff...I won..judge found in my favour
« Last Edit: September 20, 2022, 07:08:40 PM by Angelo222 »

Offline G-Unit

I agree...inadequate lawyers...obviously didn't pick up on the point that amarals claims were not based on fact...would have done better letting me handle it

You still clinging to that are you? They were the facts of the investigation whether you accept that or not.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

You still clinging to that are you? They were the facts of the investigation whether you accept that or not.

So you.agree his opinion was not based on true facts p

Offline G-Unit

Blame The Lawyers.  That's always a good one.  Presuming that you know what you are talking about.  Which you mostly don't.

I know that no-one breached the McCann's rights under Article 6:2 pf the ECHR, so you can stop saying that they did.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

  That's always a good one.  Presuming that you know what you are talking about.  Which you mostly don't.
[/quote
I was in court about 4 weeks ago in a civil case as a defendant. Just me...the judge and a barrister for the plaintiff...I won..judge found in my favour

You’re a bit of a legal titan, supposedly, in real life….a bit of a joke here.

Care to explain the disparity?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline jassi

I know that no-one breached the McCann's rights under Article 6:2 pf the ECHR, so you can stop saying that they did.

Maybe the McCanns were ill advised, or maybe, just maybe they ignored their lawyer's advice and steamed ahead anyway.

Whatever, they lost.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Brietta

You still clinging to that are you? They were the facts of the investigation whether you accept that or not.

The fact is that the 'facts of the investigation' demonstrate nothing more or less than exactly how botched 'the investigation' was up until the time Amaral was sacked from it.

Similarly Sandra Felgueiras has put into the public domain who the source of many of the 'facts' was.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline jassi

The fact is that the 'facts of the investigation' demonstrate nothing more or less than exactly how botched 'the investigation' was up until the time Amaral was sacked from it.

Similarly Sandra Felgueiras has put into the public domain who the source of many of the 'facts' was.

Does it matter any more? The Germans are in control now - not that they seem to be making much progress
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

So you.agree his opinion was not based on true facts p

The only person who thought they had to be true was you.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

The fact is that the 'facts of the investigation' demonstrate nothing more or less than exactly how botched 'the investigation' was up until the time Amaral was sacked from it.

Similarly Sandra Felgueiras has put into the public domain who the source of many of the 'facts' was.

Poor Sandra….still smarting at putting all her money on the wrong horse.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline The General

Maybe the McCanns were ill advised, or maybe, just maybe they ignored their lawyer's advice and steamed ahead anyway.

Whatever, they lost.
It's one of the two. Or perhaps sheer conceit, given that they found that 'their complaint concerning their right to be presumed innocent was "manifestly ill-founded" '. That's scathing. That's gonna leave a mark in the morning.
Almost as cringe-inducing as David Grey's proclamation.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline The General

Poor Sandra….still smarting at putting all her money on the wrong horse.
She'll, IMHAEO, be swapping horses like Frankie Dettori again next week. Anything for airtime.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

The only person who thought they had to be true was you.
yes, why on earth should facts be true, when any fule no facts can be made up to suit.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Does it matter any more? The Germans are in control now - not that they seem to be making much progress

I rather think events have overtaken the mistakes of the past so I don't think it has mattered for quite some time.
2017 is a long time ago when this action was started, there's been a lot of water under the bridge since then.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline The General

yes, why on earth should facts be true, when any fule no facts can be made up to suit.
Using the Enigma Machine again, I see.
CONSTANTINOPLE
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.