Madeleine McCann's parents lose libel case with the European Court of Human Rights

[jassi]

So how did Smith know the man wasn't wearing glasses if he didn't see his face?

I think you could register features such as glass, beard/mustache, short/long hair. without being able to describe an actual face

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think you could register features such as glass, beard/mustache, short/long hair. without being able to describe an actual face

Do you think you could recognise a person by the way they held a sleeping child?

[Wonderfulspam]

I think you could register features such as glass, beard/mustache, short/long hair. without being able to describe an actual face

Yes, you'd have to have seen the face to be able to register such things.  So that's the claim that Smith never saw the man's face debunked anyway.

[Wonderfulspam]

Do you think you could recognise a person by the way they held a sleeping child?

If I'd seen them carrying a sleeping child previously, quite possibly.

[Eleanor]

So how did Smith know the man wasn't wearing glasses if he didn't see his face?

It was Smith who wasn't wearing his glasses.

[Wonderfulspam]

It was Smith who wasn't wearing his glasses.

Cite?

[Lace]

Also reported that CB didn't resemble the man seen carrying a child matching a description close to  that of Madeleine.

I thought the public were ringing in saying he resembled CB?

[The General]

I thought the public were ringing in saying he resembled CB?

When? Crimewatch? The public were plucking CB's name out of their arses years before he was arrested? A German national? Time travelling callers? Why didn't they just travel back to 3rd May at 9pm and watch?

[Mr Gray]

Did the judges realise that the proven facts... Weren't proven

[Wonderfulspam]

Did the judges realise that the proven facts... Weren't proven

Gerry argued that at the SC.
Like I keep saying, do you think he wouldn't have raised the matter somewhat keenly with his lawyer?

[Eleanor]

Did the judges realise that the proven facts... Weren't proven

I don't think they were asked.  But then neither do I think that it matters.

[barrier]

Did the judges realise that the proven facts... Weren't proven

So right from the very start when the first court found in favour of the McCann's it was wrong .

[Mr Gray]

So right from the very start when the first court found in favour of the McCann's it was wrong .

Do you need me to explain the first judgement

[G-Unit]

Did the judges realise that the proven facts... Weren't proven

Immaterial imo.

[Mr Gray]

Immaterial imo.

The judges ruled that the comments by Amaral were supported by sufficient facts... They therefore need to know the facts and that cannot possibly be immaterial