The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[G-Unit]

In the Adrian Prout case,Brian Pixton of the SW complex case unit explains  .

"The code of the crown prosecutors dictates we must have sufficient evidence for a good prospect of conviction before we charge a suspect.

As far as I can gather the German prosecutors not only have to satisfy themselves, they have to convince a judge too.

It seems a few people are relying on hope instead of evidence (again). Not that Madeleine is alive and findable, but that she was murdered in 2007 by Brueckner.

In my opinion some people will support any theory at all so long as it doesn't involve those close to Madeleine.

[Wonderfulspam]

In the Adrian Prout case,Brian Pixton of the SW complex case unit explains  .

"The code of the crown prosecutors dictates we must have sufficient evidence for a good prospect of conviction before we charge a suspect.

'Show' trials, that never really had a prospect of successful conviction, are known to take place in the U.S.

The George Zimmerman trial is one example, where the states own police chief witness testified on direct that the police always believed Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin in self defence.

He was pursued by prosecutors & taken to trial due to nothing other than pressure by media & public protests.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So you are prepared to accept that he is honest and deserves your trust, even though you have doubts. I prefer to stick with actions speak louder than words.

Why are you not prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt?  Why do you prefer to criticise him without being in full possession of the facts?  Just curious.  I know you will never give a straight answer. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

As far as I can gather the German prosecutors not only have to satisfy themselves, they have to convince a judge too.

It seems a few people are relying on hope instead of evidence (again). Not that Madeleine is alive and findable, but that she was murdered in 2007 by Brueckner.

In my opinion some people will support any theory at all so long as it doesn't involve those close to Madeleine.

Oh it looks like you have joined the club of those sceptics who enjoy accusing supporters of hoping that Madeleine was murdered by a paedophile.  I think that is disgraceful, quite frankly - you should be ashamed of yourself. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Why are you not prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt?  Why do you prefer to criticise him without being in full possession of the facts?  Just curious.  I know you will never give a straight answer.

We already are in full possession of the facts.

The fact is, Brueckner will never be charged with anything relating to Maddie.

That's how concrete the evidence against him is.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Accusing supporters of hoping Madeleine was murdered by a paedo is as inane as accusing Spam of hoping Madeleine was strangled to death by her father, or as stupid as accusing Faithlilly of hoping that Madeleine died after falling off the patio and being dumped like rubbish in a bin.  Only a complete sicko would hope any of these happened so please stop making these idiotic claims, thanks.

[Wonderfulspam]

Accusing supporters of hoping Madeleine was murdered by a paedo is as inane as accusing Spam of hoping Madeleine was strangled to death by her father, or as stupid as accusing Faithlilly of hoping that Madeleine died after falling off the patio and being dumped like rubbish in a bin.  Only a complete sicko would hope any of these happened so please stop making these idiotic claims, thanks.

Well I'll never give up my right to support murderers, rapists & paedophiles & hoping Madeleine was murdered by her parents, thankyou.

Now, let's get back to the topic at hand. The evidence against Christian Brueckner. There just isn't any. Nothing that will ever stand up in court anyway.

[Wonderfulspam]

The possible evidence thus far:


Exhibit A: Witness 1: Brueckner's confession to Busching.

Exhibit B: Witness 2: Brueckner's confession/online chat, with the undertaker.

I have another suggestion for possible evidence.

It's possible Brueckner's phone line could have tapped. There could be a covert recording of Brueckner discussing his involvement in Madeleine's abduction & murder.

Can anyone else suggest any other potential types of evidence that there could be against Brueckner?

Davel's Advocaat here....

There could be images of Madeleine, or of an unidentified blonde girl of the right approximate age, found on Brueckner's memory stick. 

There could be something like that. But it doesn't seem particularly likely to me.
Especially when one considers that if such evidence really did exist, well, Brueckner would know full well that it did & that it had been recovered from his memory stick, yet he's still quite happy to mock the prosecutor & challenge him to put up or shut up.

[jassi]

Well I'll never give up my right to support murderers, rapists & paedophiles & hoping Madeleine was murdered by her parents, thankyou.

Now, let's get back to the topic at hand. The evidence against Christian Brueckner. There just isn't any. Nothing that will ever stand up in court anyway.

Which is why its not going anywhere near a court any time soon

[Wonderfulspam]

Which is why its not going anywhere near a court any time soon

Ahhh, but you don't know what evidence Wolters has!!!

You're welcome to hazard a guess & make suggestions as to what evidence Wolters might have though.

Please do, because no one else is. Even those who are convinced Wolters really has some. Strangely enough.

[jassi]

Ahhh, but you don't know what evidence Wolters has!!!

You're welcome to hazard a guess & make suggestions as to what evidence Wolters might have though.

Please do, because no one else is. Even those who are convinced Wolters really has some. Strangely enough.

True, but whatever he might have is clearly not enough.
IMO it is doubtful that it will ever be enough.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What is clear is that some people hope fervently that this case is never resolved so that they can go on accusing the parents forever, all the while knowing that the likelihood of them ever being charged is virtually non-existent.

[Wonderfulspam]

What is clear is that some people hope fervently that this case is never resolved so that they can go on accusing the parents forever, all the while knowing that the likelihood of them ever being charged is virtually non-existent.

No. It's called realism. Madeleine simply wasn't abducted. That's why the three expert investigative forces, armed as they are with all the concrete evidence, are completely unable to prove she ever was.

[Wonderfulspam]

No. It's called realism. Madeleine simply wasn't abducted. That's why the three expert investigative forces, armed as they are with all the concrete evidence, are completely unable to prove she ever was.

They can't even present a shred of credible evidence she ever was, let alone prove anything.

[Wonderfulspam]

And of course, I can state as fact that Madeleine wasn't abducted, because just the other day a certain Mod stated as fact that she was. You see. This is what's known as fairness. But then, the McCanns weren't very fair to Madeleine, so it's unsurprising their supporters don't play fair either really.