The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[Wonderfulspam]

Anyway. Let's get back to the topic.

The evidence against Christian Brueckner. It's concrete apparently. But no one will suggest what it could possibly be.

[Angelo222]

Anyway. Let's get back to the topic.

The evidence against Christian Brueckner. It's concrete apparently. But no one will suggest what it could possibly be.

Only Wolters says it is concrete but I don't believe a word he says.  In fact if he had anything concrete linking Bruckner with Maddie's murder he would have been charged by now. The entire thing was nothing more than a ploy imo in an attempt to get someone to come forward with real information. It failed absymally of course which says much for Wolters credibly.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Only Wolters says it is concrete but I don't believe a word he says.  In fact if he had anything concrete linking Bruckner with Maddie's murder he would have been charged by now. The entire thing was nothing more than a ploy imo in an attempt to get someone to come forward with real information. It failed absymally of course which says much for Wolters credibly.

And yet over two years later he is still in charge and hasn’t yet been demoted to the role of traffic cop as one of the trolls on here suggested some time ago.  Funny that.

[Angelo222]

They can't even present a shred of credible evidence she ever was, let alone prove anything.

That about sums it up eh?

[Angelo222]

And yet over two years later he is still in charge and hasn’t yet been demoted to the role of traffic cop as one of the trolls on here suggested some time ago.  Funny that.

He's a prosecutor, not a cop.

[Angelo222]

And of course, I can state as fact that Madeleine wasn't abducted, because just the other day a certain Mod stated as fact that she was. You see. This is what's known as fairness. But then, the McCanns weren't very fair to Madeleine, so it's unsurprising their supporters don't play fair either really.

Suppose there's some logic in there somewhere 

[Angelo222]

What is clear is that some people hope fervently that this case is never resolved so that they can go on accusing the parents forever, all the while knowing that the likelihood of them ever being charged is virtually non-existent.

Never say never.

[Vertigo Swirl]

He's a prosecutor, not a cop.

tell that to the troll who claimed that was going to happen.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Suppose there's some logic in there somewhere 

Let me know when you find it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Never say never.

It’s never going to happen.  There, I said it.

[Wonderfulspam]

Only Wolters says it is concrete but I don't believe a word he says.  In fact if he had anything concrete linking Bruckner with Maddie's murder he would have been charged by now. The entire thing was nothing more than a ploy imo in an attempt to get someone to come forward with real information. It failed absymally of course which says much for Wolters credibly.

Everyone else can see it, but there are none so blind as McCann supporters. Evidently.

[G-Unit]

Why are you not prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt?  Why do you prefer to criticise him without being in full possession of the facts?  Just curious.  I know you will never give a straight answer.

In 2020 Wolters announced that Madeleine was dead and Brueckner did it. He hasn't, and, imo, can't prove the truth of his claim. Such statements shouldn't be made until they've been proved, in court, and the suspect convicted.

[Eleanor]

In 2020 Wolters announced that Madeleine was dead and Brueckner did it. He hasn't, and, imo, can't prove the truth of his claim. Such statements shouldn't be made until they've been proved, in court, and the suspect convicted.

What?

[Vertigo Swirl]

In 2020 Wolters announced that Madeleine was dead and Brueckner did it. He hasn't, and, imo, can't prove the truth of his claim. Such statements shouldn't be made until they've been proved, in court, and the suspect convicted.

How would a prosecutor prosecute if he or she was not allowed to name their suspect and accuse them until after they were convicted?

Has HCW broken German law?

I take it you don’t have a problem with ex-cops announcing who dunnit before it’s been proved in court, right?

[Eleanor]

How would a prosecutor prosecute if he or she was not allowed to name their suspect and accuse them until after they were convicted?

Has HCW broken German law?

I take it you don’t have a problem with ex-cops announcing who dunnit before it’s been proved in court, right?

The hypocrisy is stunning.