The Evidence Against Christian Brueckner

[Vertigo Swirl]

In 2020 Wolters announced that Madeleine was dead and Brueckner did it. He hasn't, and, imo, can't prove the truth of his claim. Such statements shouldn't be made until they've been proved, in court, and the suspect convicted.

Tell me why you are convinced HCW has already shared all the evidence he has against CB and is lying about having further evidence which has not been revealed.

[Wonderfulspam]

Tell me why you are convinced HCW has already shared all the evidence he has against CB and is lying about having further evidence which has not been revealed.

Is there any evidence that Wolters has concrete evidence?  If you know of any, care to share it?

[Wonderfulspam]

Or perhaps, VS, you could answer the question I pose at the beginning of the thread.

What possible evidence against Brueckner could there be?

[G-Unit]

How would a prosecutor prosecute if he or she was not allowed to name their suspect and accuse them until after they were convicted?

Has HCW broken German law?

I take it you don’t have a problem with ex-cops announcing who dunnit before it’s been proved in court, right?

You clearly don't understand why Amaral wasn't found to have libelled the McCanns. It wasn't because Portuguese justice was wrong. It wasn't because the Portuguese hoodwinked the ECHR. It was because Amaral didn't libel them.

Wolters has breached Brueckner's human rights, however. Not by naming him, not by saying he personally thinks he did it, but by saying, as a prosecutor, that Brueckner is guilty.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You clearly don't understand why Amaral wasn't found to have libelled the McCanns. It wasn't because Portuguese justice was wrong. It wasn't because the Portuguese hoodwinked the ECHR. It was because Amaral didn't libel them.

Wolters has breached Brueckner's human rights, however. Not by naming him, not by saying he personally thinks he did it, but by saying, as a prosecutor, that Brueckner is guilty.

Please link to the ECHR judgement that states HCW has breached Brückner’s human rights, thanks.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Tell me why you are convinced HCW has already shared all the evidence he has against CB and is lying about having further evidence which has not been revealed.

And while you’re at it, you can answer this one as well.

[Wonderfulspam]

And while you’re at it, you can answer this one as well.

Well, Wolters hasn't shared the concrete evidence with the McCanns, as their appeal to the ECHR demonstrates.
There'd be no need to appeal if their daughter really was abducted & murdered by Brueckner.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You clearly don't understand why Amaral wasn't found to have libelled the McCanns. It wasn't because Portuguese justice was wrong. It wasn't because the Portuguese hoodwinked the ECHR. It was because Amaral didn't libel them.

Wolters has breached Brueckner's human rights, however. Not by naming him, not by saying he personally thinks he did it, but by saying, as a prosecutor, that Brueckner is guilty.

Your words: “The ECHR doesn't rule on libel, it rules on human rights”.  Did the ECHR rule that Amaral’s book did not libel the McCanns? 

[Wonderfulspam]

Or perhaps, VS, you could answer the question I pose at the beginning of the thread.

What possible evidence against Brueckner could there be?

Still no takers on this then?

Can't imagine why not.

[sadie]

Still no takers on this then?

Can't imagine why not.

I have stromg pointers against Bruckner, some mentioned before, but ignored by you.

There are others mentioned by Brietta and others, but ignored by you.


And there are others which I do not intend to share, but I have no actual proof.   Therefore as far as I am concerned, Bruckner is innocent .   but he is on the Back burner.


 
I think Bruckner is a driver, climber and enterer of buildings,   He may have taken Madeleine up to Porto area, on the day after Madeleine was abducted, as witnessed by Carlos Moreira at the roadside cafe on the N10 (old main road up to Porto).   I believe that he might later have transported her eastwards across Portugal, via interesting ...'sighting' towns to Barcelona and the Victiria Beckham look alike there      BUT, I DONT KNOW for sure.   
Therefore he is innocent.    And if involved, he just works to the orders of the real perps.   A paid handyman.   IMO


I think that Wolters may well have been conned to give respite to the real perps.   If I were the Police, I might be looking at some of his superiors to see their connections.


I believe that Madeleine is very much alive.   Her outstanding bloodline is a treasure to someone


Everything above is from my opinion only, but based upon a great deal of deep research

[faithlilly]

He is on record that he is not going to share material evidence with witnesses.

I think Madeleine's parents are mature and experienced enough to cope with that.  The BKA is their best option for finding out what happened to Madeleine.

It’s surprising then that they did nothing but whinge to the tabloids when the PJ wouldn’t share evidence with them.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It’s surprising then that they did nothing but whinge to the tabloids when the PJ wouldn’t share evidence with them.

It’s not surprising at all when you actually flex your brain cells and put them to good use.

[Vertigo Swirl]

WIMP !

I think PERVERT ! would have been more appropriate there Sadie 

[Vertigo Swirl]

The hypocrisy is stunning.

Presumably G-Unit would have no problem with HCW if he had kept quiet until the day after CB was no longer an official suspect and then resigned to publish a damning book about the rapist’s involvement in Madeleine’s abduction and murder, a book that went on to be an international bestseller.  That would have been perfectly fair of course, and not harmed CB one jot.

[Wonderfulspam]

The possible evidence thus far.

Known:

Exhibit A: Witness 1: Brueckner's confession to Busching.

Exhibit B: Witness 2: Brueckner's confession/online chat, with the undertaker.

Possible:

A wire tapped recording with Brueckner discussing involvement in Madeleine's abduction.

A video or photo of a child.

................

I have another suggestion. Brueckner has talked of 'documenting the torture'.

So there could be some kind of diary containing information alluding to child abuse, and/or abduction.