Author Topic: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!  (Read 462203 times)

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

With thanks to John for the links.

I had no idea that Innocentman had presented himself to the police in 2007.       
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=3251.msg123092#msg123092

Now that I can see exactly where the main reception area is located in relation to where Jane tanner saw the man carrying a child I do not understand why he was walking in the direction indicated. 

If he made a detour for any reason, for example getting really lost, I’m sure NSY have checked that out already.

Since that information doesn’t appear to be in the public domain and until it is, I believe that Jane Tanner saw Madeleine being abducted. I am not alone in finding the route being taken a bit strange.

 ~ My main point however is much more significant.  It says in the quote above that this guy had picked up his own two-year-old daughter from a crèche close to where Madeleine vanished.  But remember, the night crèche is not close to the Ocean Club Garden, the block from where Madeleine disappeared.  The night crèche  (see plan) is actually some distance away, 275 yds or 250 metres to be precise and not what I would consider close in an urban environment.  Close for me would be the day crèche which was only 70 metres away.
If as he claims, that he picked his daughter up at around the time of the sighting ie 9.15pm, why on earth was he walking from west to east ie towards the night crèche and not from south to north as he would have been had he in fact been coming from the night crèche?
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=3251.msg123121#msg123121

I believe that Jane Tanner saw Madeleine being abducted.

Jane obviously doesn't.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Brietta

I believe that Jane Tanner saw Madeleine being abducted.

Jane obviously doesn't.

Any opinion on why the man seen was taking the route and the direction indicated by Jane Tanner? 

I am puzzled as to the reason.

He was walking from the direction of 5a, and by no stretch of the imagination can I place him coming from the direction of the crèche.

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline sadie

Sadie

Why are you taking  the  'Cutting Edge'  TV programme,  with which the McCanns collaborated,  as your point of reference  ? 

It is a questionable source of information because it depicts  nothing more than the  'recollections'  of the McCanns and a couple of their mates

You present it as though it were some kind of independent source of irrefutable evidence

It is not
Just  watch Jane Tanner opposing Gerry !  At about 10.05



Then watch from 11.15

11.54  Jane "Why the hell didn't you think (about herself) then....

"....there was only one person who could have stopped anything ...."   

"If .., if ......if ....."   



Poor tortured woman , and you are trying to make her a liar !   Shame on you Icabod

.

Then watch her crying @ about 12.26 .  The tears running down her face.   See if you disbelieve her sincerity.   Even AnnGuedes has said she believes Jane.






Why shouldn't we believe what she says?     

Jane was there, remember

You weren't

Now I have to go out.

Offline pathfinder73

Quote from: Brietta

I believe that Jane Tanner saw Madeleine being abducted.



Look at crecheman's kids clothes (see below) - they're a match to Tannerman's child. That kid was not Madeleine. Smithman was seen carrying Madeleine.

« Last Edit: April 23, 2014, 05:15:34 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Wonderfulspam



Look at crecheman's kids clothes (see below) - they're a match to Tannerman's child. That kid was not Madeleine. Smithman was seen carrying Madeleine.



If Ms Tanner herself still believed she really did see Maddie being abducted then she would have told someone at SY by now wouldn't she? 

Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Cariad

  • Guest
Just  watch Jane Tanner opposing Gerry !  At about 10.05



Then watch from 11.15

11.54  Jane "Why the hell didn't you think (about herself) then....

"....there was only one person who could have stopped anything ...."   

"If .., if ......if ....."   



Poor tortured woman , and you are trying to make her a liar !  Shame on you Icabod

.

Then watch her crying @ about 12.26 .  The tears running down her face.   See if you disbelieve her sincerity.   Even AnnGuedes has said she believes Jane.






Why shouldn't we believe what she says?     

Jane was there, remember

You weren't

Now I have to go out.

You are really very vicious Sadie, yet constantly cry abuse at the hands of others. How about 'treat others as you would have them treat you'.....

Offline sadie

If Ms Tanner herself still believed she really did see Maddie being abducted then she would have told someone at SY by now wouldn't she?
And probably has

Why should they share what their reasons are?

Offline sadie



Look at crecheman's kids clothes (see below) - they're a match to Tannerman's child. That kid was not Madeleine. Smithman was seen carrying Madeleine.


There is something about those Pyjamas.  To me they look more like a 7 year olds than a 2 year olds

Offline pegasus

Just  watch Jane Tanner opposing Gerry !  At about 10.05
Then watch from 11.15
11.54  Jane "Why the hell didn't you think (about herself) then....
"....there was only one person who could have stopped anything ...."   
"If .., if ......if ....."   
Poor tortured woman , and you are trying to make her a liar !   Shame on you Icabod
Then watch her crying @ about 12.26 .  The tears running down her face.   See if you disbelieve her sincerity
...
I agree 101% with Sadie here.
The absolute sincerity of JT is beyond question IMO.
I hope peeps watch the sections of the video which Sadie points out.
JT's account of passing the chat is totally true IMO.
That JW did not see JT is IMO easily accounted by the parked cars and by him watching his child.

Offline sadie

I agree 101% with Sadie here.
The absolute sincerity of JT is beyond question IMO.
I hope peeps watch the sections of the video which Sadie points out.
JT's account of passing the chat is totally true IMO.
That JW did not see JT is IMO easily accounted by the parked cars and by him watching his child.
Thanks again Pegasus.  Despite our differences on some points, I could happily work with you.  You have honour. 8((()*/

Offline pegasus

Some peeps seem to think "flip-flops" is a purely onomatopoeic word (one can find various online sources claiming that is true) and that therefore they always make audible noise.
IMO the word is not onomatopoeic.
IMO "flip-flop" refers mainly to the sensation the wearer feels when walking in them (not to the noise, which it is easy enough to prove may be inaudible).


Offline pathfinder73

Look at how wide that pavement is for JT to pass without being seen 8-)(--)



4078    “Okay.  So when did you first notice Gerry standing there?”

Reply    “I would have probably noticed him as soon as I came, I mean, I don’t, this is not, I don’t think that distance is probably as far as that, you come out and he was, they were sort of, so almost, I’d probably say almost straight away.  Again, I don’t know, but I, I know people are saying I’ve not been on the road, but they were there and I wouldn’t know they were there if I hadn’t walked past, you know, you’ve got to see my frustration in this, and I know Gerry didn’t see me and Jez didn’t see me, but”.

4078    “You were there?”

Reply    “They were there and I was there”
 
4078    “And can you remember, as you past them or thought to acknowledge them, then you noticed they were deep in conversation, can you remember which angle you saw them from, which way they were facing?”

Reply    “No, I, phew, again, I would probably guess Gerry’s back was more towards me, because I would have thought if I’d have seen him I would have definitely probably stopped and said ‘Oh you’re in trouble, you’ve been long, we think you’ve been watching the footy’, you know, but.  Because I think that’s almost when I went to acknowledge them, that’s almost what went through my head, you know, is to sort of give a bit of abuse about the fact he’d been so long, but.  So I would imagine his, maybe his back was to me, but.  And, again, in that way, that would make more sense, because I don’t know Jez, so it’s not like I would have gone ‘Oh hi Jez’, you know, that way, so.  Yeah, I, I honestly, I can’t remember now which way they were.  But I do, I stand by the fact I’m sure they were nearer than right over here”

4078    “Okay.  And did you hear what they were saying?”

Reply    “No.  No, not really.  Not that I can remember”.

4078    “Were there any cars around there?”

Reply    “Erm, umm, no, I don’t know.  I don’t remember.  I don’t remember walking past any going up here and I think I would have probably, if there had been I would have realised, because that would have obscured my view of the person walking, so I can’t think of, I can’t think of any, no”.

4078    “So as you are trying to remember it and you can think of yourself walking up that road and you have gone past Gerry and Jez”.

Reply    “Umm”.

4078    “Are you conscious of any other movement?”

Reply    “It’s, it’s too long now.  Erm, no, not really.  I mean, I was just walking up, you know, I was like just sort of on a, not on a mission, but I was just like, you know, on the way to, to check, so I didn’t notice anything either side.  The only thing I noticed a movement was when somebody walked across at the top”.

4078    “Go on to tell me about that then as slowly as you can?”

Reply    “Yes, erm, I was, I think I was nearing the top of the road, it’s a bit of a, I’m trying to think how, but I can’t really remember how much of a hill it is, but it is definitely a hill going up there, and just as I got to the top somebody did walk across.  And the thing that really struck me was the, erm, the bare feet. 

Reply    “Yeah, that is, erm, and I think at that point I did think as well, the way they were dressed wasn’t quite touristy.  As I say, I mean, I looked a right state because I’d got Russell’s big jumper on, cropped trousers and flip-flips and, yeah, it was quite, you know, sort of cold and, and they looked more like they were prepared for the weather, you know, sort of thing.  And I think when Jez, I think Jez had probably got shorts on and, you know, a jumper or something, and looked more like.  He just didn’t look quite like a, you know, a tourist, I suppose, or, so”.

4078    “Okay”.

Reply    “So really, you know, at the time, I thought.  And I think I did actually think ‘Oh a bit odd’, but never in a million years would I have thought ‘That’s Madeleine’.  And I think, well Gerry was standing on the bloomin’ road, so I thought he’d, not thought, he’d just, he had just checked, you know, I thought he’d just checked”.

4078    “If you had have thought that was Madeleine at the time you would have said?”

Reply    “Well, yeah, if I’d have thought, yeah, you know, if I’d have seen it was Madeleine you’d have, you know, I’m not going to go ‘Oh there goes Madeleine’, you know, I would have shouted”.
« Last Edit: April 24, 2014, 03:31:16 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline sadie

Look at how wide that pavement is for JT to pass without being seen 8-)(--)




Do you not undestand  perspective and foreshortening, Pathfinder?  THe footpath being foreshortened looks far narrower than it is in reality

I suggest that you use GE and get a birds eye view, then measure the width

You will find that the pavement is at least 2 metres wide and if they are on the curved bit as Jez indicated with his sketch, it will be a little wider.  With Jez in the road and Gerry on the kerb edge that leaves plenty of room for Jane to walk past.  And if her flip flops are the expensive type sturdiky made of leather, she would make very little noise, if any .  Might not be any more noticeable than the sound of someone walking past in normal lightweight shoes.

Jane cannot be short of lolly, with a good position herself and partnered by Russell.   Every reason to believe, especially when going to dinner rather than the beach, that her "flip flops" would be the quality kind.  In other words the silent type

Offline slartibartfast

There is something about those Pyjamas.  To me they look more like a 7 year olds than a 2 year olds

A) She was 9 days off her 4th birthday.
B) What are your measuring against?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline sadie

A) She was 9 days off her 4th birthday.
B) What are your measuring against?

Slarti

Have you missed something?.

Those jamies in the photo are meant to be the pyjamas of the 2 year old child "innocent man" was carrying back from the creche.  Please correct me if I have this wrong, cos I am doing it from memory.



Even with lots of the legs cut off the photograph, those pyjamas look more like the size a 7 year old would wear, dontcha think?