Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!

[stephen25000]

perhaps the statements and times were not accurate...perhaps they were poorly translated....

the investigation has moved on, it's about time others caught up

Yes we know where the investigation is......

 

and here's an anagram of it for your delectation...........

'Weak-headed, populistic truth.'

[Wonderfulspam]

perhaps the statements and times were not accurate...perhaps they were poorly translated....

the investigation has moved on, it's about time others caught up

Like Kate & Gerry for example.....

They're still clinging to bundleman.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/campaigns/unidentified_people.html


Smithman was the abductor, ask the smiling Mr Redwood.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwVMsDIoULQ#t=317


But it's still christmas in fantasy abduction land.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

[sadie]

Like Kate & Gerry for example.....

They're still clinging to bundleman.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/campaigns/unidentified_people.html


Smithman was the abductor, ask the smiling Mr Redwood.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwVMsDIoULQ#t=317


But it's still christmas in fantasy abduction land.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

There is NOTHING Christmas about a little girl being stolen

[stephen25000]

There is NOTHING Christmas about a little girl being stolen

It has not been determined Sadie what happened to Madeleine, other than she disappeared.

[Eleanor]

It has not been determined Sadie what happened to Madeleine, other than she disappeared.

Well, i'm glad we agree on that.

[Alice Purjorick]

perhaps the statements and times were not accurate...perhaps they were poorly translated....

the investigation has moved on, it's about time others caught up

Indeed it did about 16 months ago when the met announced "The Tanner Sighting" was not relevant.
Ooops primary suspect gorn.
Meanwhile down at the pig farm and in amongst the binmen........................?
According to last weeks Telegraph Online, however, Smithman remains a suspect. Of course they could be making it up because some posters on here believe Smithman was a wraith.

[pathfinder73]

Why are you deliberately putting out this misinformation?  It has been worked out on this forum using three soundc sources that Gerry was mistaken and that the chat took place across the road , but partially in the road and on the corner of the allleyway.

I think that shot is taken from a video filmed after the new brighter lighting, with little doubt extra lighting as is usually the case when filming... so is false information.

I'm not putting out misinformation. I don't believe what Gerry says. That was to show Brietta the light  Sadie, it's impossible for Jane to pass them on the same pavement without being seen or heard on a quiet deserted street!  She may have seen the man crossing from much further back and then turned left down the lane so didn't pass them. She is unreliable as a witness as past events show. That is a sensible possible theory if she saw them and the man.

[sadie]

It has not been determined Sadie what happened to Madeleine, other than she disappeared.

Well why do YOU and others on here keep pushing that Madeleine died at the hands of The Mccanns ... or at the very least The Mccanns hid the body?

That's OK, is it ?

To "set up" a family with NOTHING against them, no pointers even, as having been involved?



SY believe she was abducted, they have made that clear.  PT Authorities have nothing against The Mccanns


 .... Yet YOU and others on here think it OK to hound them because you have believed propaganda and myths deliberately put about 


 .... and YOU dont like the sound of their voices.


How TRITE and TWEE.

[Anna]

I'm not putting out misinformation. I don't believe what Gerry says. That was to show Brietta the light  Sadie, it's impossible for Jane to pass them on the same pavement without being seen or heard on a quiet deserted street!  She may have seen the man crossing from much further back and then turned left down the lane so didn't pass them. She is unreliable as a witness as past events show. That is a sensible possible theory if she saw them and the man.

I believe that, Sadie was trying to point out, that the photograph that you posted, was with the new, brighter lighting and the old lighting was not very good, hence poor visibility, compared to the new lights.

[Benice]

I'm not putting out misinformation. I don't believe what Gerry says. That was to show Brietta the light  Sadie, it's impossible for Jane to pass them on the same pavement without being seen or heard on a quiet deserted street!  She may have seen the man crossing from much further back and then turned left down the lane so didn't pass them. She is unreliable as a witness as past events show. That is a sensible possible theory if she saw them and the man.

No it isn't.  As I posted a while back - I myself have experienced a very similar situation -and I'm sure I'm not the only one.  The only major difference in my situation - where a jogger passed between me - standing at my gate  and my grandson - sitting in his car - without my grandson seeing him  - was that it was broad daylight at the time.  We were also talking to one another at the time it happened.

The reason he didn't see him was because at the precise moment the jogger passed between us grandson was looking down trying to retrieve his keys which he had dropped when he leaned out to close the car door.

I made a comment to him about the jogger's shorts and grandson replied ''whose shorts?''.  He had no  idea that anyone had just passed a few feet away from him.   

Gerry had his back to JT - all it needed was for Jez to be looking down at his baby to miss her in the couple of seconds it took for her to pass by - in the dark.

[pathfinder73]

I believe that, Sadie was trying to point out, that the photograph that you posted, was with the new, brighter lighting and the old lighting was not very good, hence poor visibility, compared to the new lights.

He noticed the bad street lighting and although it was not completely dark there was enough light to see clearly. As he approached the corner of the McCanns apartment, he saw Gerry appear from the area of the gate. He crossed the road and engaged in general conversation with Gerry. At this time they were stood with Gerry's back to the building near to the gate and Jeremy facing him. Rua Dr Agostino was about 10-15 meters to his right and the pathway leading to the front of the apartment blocks about 5 meters to his left.
He was adamant that he did not see any one else in the area. When spoken to in reference to Jane Tanner walking by, he again stated that he saw no one. He also stated that he did not see or hear anyone to his right. He was aware of the recent picture in the papers re the person with a child wrapped in a blanket and in a males arms allegedly walking across the junction to his right but again stated that he did not see any one.
The conversation with Gerry lasted for about three minutes during which Gerry was chatty and in his normal self. Jeremy then made his way back to his apartment.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JEREMY_BRIGET.htm

[sadie]

I believe that, Sadie was trying to point out, that the photograph that you posted, was with the new, brighter lighting and the old lighting was not very good, hence poor visibility, compared to the new lights.

Thank you Anna.  Other anomolies too.

[Anna]

He noticed the bad street lighting and although it was not completely dark there was enough light to see clearly. As he approached the corner of the McCanns apartment, he saw Gerry appear from the area of the gate. He crossed the road and engaged in general conversation with Gerry. At this time they were stood with Gerry's back to the building near to the gate and Jeremy facing him. Rua Dr Agostino was about 10-15 meters to his right and the pathway leading to the front of the apartment blocks about 5 meters to his left.
He was adamant that he did not see any one else in the area. When spoken to in reference to Jane Tanner walking by, he again stated that he saw no one. He also stated that he did not see or hear anyone to his right. He was aware of the recent picture in the papers re the person with a child wrapped in a blanket and in a males arms allegedly walking across the junction to his right but again stated that he did not see any one.
The conversation with Gerry lasted for about three minutes during which Gerry was chatty and in his normal self. Jeremy then made his way back to his apartment.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JEREMY_BRIGET.htm

It was different lighting to the lighting on that night, in your photograph!

A person with a child in a pram, would naturally keep checking/looking down at that child while talking to someone and there is the possibility that, Jez was doing just that, when JT passed. It is a natural reaction, that you wouldn't be aware of doing, if you tried to think back.

[faithlilly]

You are remembering wrongly.   In Jezes Rogatory statement, as far as I can find, there is no mention of the pathway.

Jezes Rog

Eventually, I left one road to the other side of the street to the pool complex, between the McCann apartment and the Tapas Bar. In order to visualise this street, I believe it was the street most used by the news agencies and journalists as all the parked cars indicated during the coverage period.
When I left the street, I remember seeing Gerry on the other side of the same. I believe that there was some speculation in the press regarding the circumstances of this encounter. I remember that I crossed the street to talk to Gerry. According to what I remember, Gerry was walking when I spotted him.

I'm not remembering anything sadie and wishful thinking won't make it so.

Jez in his statements says he was 5 metres from the alley leading the front of the apartments and the conveststion took place 'right there on the pathway.

[faithlilly]

No it isn't.  As I posted a while back - I myself have experienced a very similar situation -and I'm sure I'm not the only one.  The only major difference in my situation - where a jogger passed between me - standing at my gate  and my grandson - sitting in his car - without my grandson seeing him  - was that it was broad daylight at the time.  We were also talking to one another at the time it happened.

The reason he didn't see him was because at the precise moment the jogger passed between us grandson was looking down trying to retrieve his keys which he had dropped when he leaned out to close the car door.

I made a comment to him about the jogger's shorts and grandson replied ''whose shorts?''.  He had no  idea that anyone had just passed a few feet away from him.   

Gerry had his back to JT - all it needed was for Jez to be looking down at his baby to miss her in the couple of seconds it took for her to pass by - in the dark.

Gerry had his back to the wall, both literally and figuratively.