Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!

[Alfred R Jones]

Who could prove she was lying, even if she was?  Its all just been passed off as inconsistencies  in testimony.

No one can prove whether she made the journey she describes, or not as no one saw her.

If she lied to save the skin of another then of course she places herself at risk - of perverting the course of justice. 

[jassi]

Indeed, but was it really a risk? Who could prove otherwise?

[Alfred R Jones]

Indeed, but was it really a risk? Who could prove otherwise?

According to some "sceptics" on here, the Met have invented Crecheman to unsettle the McCanns and JT, because they know JT never saw anyone and that she was covering for GM.  Obviously they are building a case against them both, dontcha see?!  It's as plain as the nose on yer face innit?

[Brietta]

Who could prove she was lying, even if she was?  Its all just been passed off as inconsistencies  in testimony.

No one can prove whether she made the journey she describes, or not as no one saw her.

Wonder if they were running a pilot experiment Star Trek-style?? ... we know Jane left to check on the children ... we know she came back ... so if she didn't walk the route from reception to the apartment, she must have "beamed" and that thought isn't nearly as ridiculous as some of the inane comments which have been made about her over the last nearly eight years.

One would have thought the woman would have been given some respite with the identification of Tannerman ... but that can't be allowed to sink in ... because it means one of the tapas seven is proved to be telling the truth and we can't have that!

 **snip
Star Trek-style ''beaming up'' of people through space could become a reality sometime in the far future, the leader of a landmark teleportation experiment has said.
Nothing in the laws of physics prevents the teleportation of large objects, including humans, Professor Ronald Hanson pointed out.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10863929/Beam-me-up-Scotty-teleportation-could-become-reality.html

[Alice Purjorick]

Wonder if they were running a pilot experiment Star Trek-style?? ... we know Jane left to check on the children ... we know she came back ... so if she didn't walk the route from reception to the apartment, she must have "beamed" and that thought isn't nearly as ridiculous as some of the inane comments which have been made about her over the last nearly eight years.

One would have thought the woman would have been given some respite with the identification of Tannerman ... but that can't be allowed to sink in ... because it means one of the tapas seven is proved to be telling the truth and we can't have that!

 **snip
Star Trek-style ''beaming up'' of people through space could become a reality sometime in the far future, the leader of a landmark teleportation experiment has said.
Nothing in the laws of physics prevents the teleportation of large objects, including humans, Professor Ronald Hanson pointed out.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10863929/Beam-me-up-Scotty-teleportation-could-become-reality.html

Two points on the graph and a gross assumption of what it is a graph of 

[jassi]

According to some "sceptics" on here, the Met have invented Crecheman to unsettle the McCanns and JT, because they know JT never saw anyone and that she was covering for GM.  Obviously they are building a case against them both, dontcha see?!  It's as plain as the nose on yer face innit?

No, I don't think so.  SY are still struggling with the abduction scenario, though to date, they have neither proved an abduction, nor identified a culprit.

[Alfred R Jones]

No, I don't think so.  SY are still struggling with the abduction scenario, though to date, they have neither proved an abduction, nor identified a culprit.

Well, it's good to know you're not quite as far up the conspiracy tree as some other "sceptics" on here... 

[Anna]

Who could prove she was lying, even if she was?  Its all just been passed off as inconsistencies  in testimony.

No one can prove whether she made the journey she describes, or not as no one saw her.

And that is a great shame. ......

If JT, Jez and Gerry and possibly Tannerman, had been seen by someone within the windows or balconies, that overlooked the street, it would have been believed by all.

However, that was not the case, but JT did not know, that they hadn't been observed by anyone.

Fancy taking the risk of saying that she passed Jez and Gerry and saw Tannerman, when she didn't know if they were being watched from a window or a balcony.  &%+((£

[jassi]

I'm sure it would have been passed off as them being mistaken.
Is that not what is being said of the couple on their balcony who said they did not see Gerry & Jez?

[Anna]

I'm sure it would have been passed off as them being mistaken.
Is that not what is being said of the couple on their balcony who said they did not see Gerry & Jez?

Sorry, jassi, I must have missed that. Do you have a link?

[Alfred R Jones]

I'm sure it would have been passed off as them being mistaken.
Is that not what is being said of the couple on their balcony who said they did not see Gerry & Jez?

But this is the very reason given by Faithlilly as to why Gerry had to denounce JT, by saying he never saw her.  Doesn't really make much sense does it.... &%+((£

[Anna]

I'm sure it would have been passed off as them being mistaken.
Is that not what is being said of the couple on their balcony who said they did not see Gerry & Jez?

Is this what you are referring too? They didn't see anyone.


They walked past apartment 5a but noticed nothing untoward. The woman said in her statement: “I stood on the balcony at about 9.15 with a whisky.


“I saw people eating at the tapas bar and children in the play area. We went to bed at 10pm-ish. We were woken up by our bell ringing at 11.30pm. It was a friend of the McCanns, saying that a little girl had been abducted. The friend asked if we had a computer so they could get the media involved in the search.


The couple are key because at precisely 9.15pm on May 3, Jane Tanner, a friend of the McCanns, said she left the tapas bar and walked past Gerry, who was talking to holidaymaker Jez Wilkins outside apartment 5a.


At the time she had not realised the significance. Officers asked the couple if they saw Jane, Gerry or Jez but they insist they did not.
---------------------------------------------------------

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/400796/Mystery-couple-seen-going-into-McCanns-flat-on-night-before-sobbing-Madeleine-disappeared

However it has been established, that Gerry and Jez were there, so they seem to be a bit out with their timing, too.

[Lyall]

Is this what you are referring too? They didn't see anyone.


They walked past apartment 5a but noticed nothing untoward. The woman said in her statement: “I stood on the balcony at about 9.15 with a whisky.


“I saw people eating at the tapas bar and children in the play area. We went to bed at 10pm-ish. We were woken up by our bell ringing at 11.30pm. It was a friend of the McCanns, saying that a little girl had been abducted. The friend asked if we had a computer so they could get the media involved in the search.


The couple are key because at precisely 9.15pm on May 3, Jane Tanner, a friend of the McCanns, said she left the tapas bar and walked past Gerry, who was talking to holidaymaker Jez Wilkins outside apartment 5a.


At the time she had not realised the significance. Officers asked the couple if they saw Jane, Gerry or Jez but they insist they did not.
---------------------------------------------------------

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/400796/Mystery-couple-seen-going-into-McCanns-flat-on-night-before-sobbing-Madeleine-disappeared

However it has been established, that Gerry and Jez were there, so they seem to be a bit out with their timing, too.

Well to be fair the exact time they were there hasn't been and can't be established.

[Anna]

Well to be fair the exact time they were there hasn't been and can't be established.

Exactly.

[Lyall]

Exactly.

I'm surprised the police never thought about having a reconstruction