Have we learned anything new after almost 16 years?

[Wonderfulspam]

You appear to be deluded.  There is no evidence whatsoever that The McCanns were involved in the disappearance of their daughter and we have every right to say so when aspersions are cast upon their honesty by persons like you.  So it is the likes of you who are causing the problems.  And that is a Fact.

I'll see your 'no evidence whatsoever against the McCanns' and raise you Martin Smiths sighting.

[G-Unit]

I'll see your 'no evidence whatsoever against the McCanns' and raise you Martin Smiths sighting.

The media said Mr Smith withdrew that allegation; but he didn't. Many people think he was mistaken, but are prepared to believe those who saw 'suspicious' people in PdL who, the media tell us, are now prepared to say it was CB they saw.

[Eleanor]

The media said Mr Smith withdrew that allegation; but he didn't. Many people think he was mistaken, but are prepared to believe those who saw 'suspicious' people in PdL who, the media tell us, are now prepared to say it was CB they saw.

Is that it?

60 to 80% sure when Mr Smith didn't even see the man's face and the rest of his large family disagreed with him about it being Gerry.  That one bombed out years ago.

I have no thoughts on it being Brueckner, but then I pay Brueckner the courtesy of Innocent Until Proven Guilty.  Perhaps you should give that one a go.

Where or not Brueckner will ever be charged with the abduction and murder of Madeleine McCann remains to be seen.  I do know that The McCanns never will be.

[Wonderfulspam]

Is that it?

60 to 80% sure when Mr Smith didn't even see the man's face and the rest of his large family disagreed with him about it being Gerry.  That one bombed out years ago.

I have no thoughts on it being Brueckner, but then I pay Brueckner the courtesy of Innocent Until Proven Guilty.  Perhaps you should give that one a go.

Where or not Brueckner will ever be charged with the abduction and murder of Madeleine McCann remains to be seen.  I do know that The McCanns never will be.

Neither will Brueckner. You can take that to the bank. The McCanns will never be giving up the search for Madeleine, that means never, they've said so enough times. Even the concrete evidence against the murderer, gathered by the continued cooperation of the three expert investigative forces, isn't enough to convince them their missing daughter is dead.

[Wonderfulspam]

The media said Mr Smith withdrew that allegation; but he didn't. Many people think he was mistaken, but are prepared to believe those who saw 'suspicious' people in PdL who, the media tell us, are now prepared to say it was CB they saw.

Some here are content to ignore what DCI Redwood had to say about the Tanner sighting & continue to believe she witnessed Madeleine's abduction. But then, Brueckner owned some wigs, so maybe it was him.

[Eleanor]

It's called Hope, Folks.  Life without Hope is hardly worth living.  And if as some say, this Hope is ridiculous, why are some of you still here Hoping to prove that The McCanns done it?

Such a horrible and pointless Hope which is never going to happen.

[G-Unit]

It's called Hope, Folks.  Life without Hope is hardly worth living.  And if as some say, this Hope is ridiculous, why are some of you still here Hoping to prove that The McCanns done it?

Such a horrible and pointless Hope which is never going to happen.

Some of us are not hoping to prove the McCanns did anything, and haven't said they did. I don't know what happened to that little girl, but I do know that there wasn't definitive evidence that a stranger entered 5A and abducted her.

[Eleanor]

Some of us are not hoping to prove the McCanns did anything, and haven't said they did. I don't know what happened to that little girl, but I do know that there wasn't definitive evidence that a stranger entered 5A and abducted her.

So what are you suggesting did happen?  Or are you just peeing into the wind?  For certain sure the pee pee is blowing back onto you with your nasty innuendos.

[Wonderfulspam]

Some of us are not hoping to prove the McCanns did anything, and haven't said they did. I don't know what happened to that little girl, but I do know that there wasn't definitive evidence that a stranger entered 5A and abducted her.

Wolters can prove Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by Christian Brueckner. He's just got to get his other crimes dealt with first. Madeline will just have to wait. But, mark my words, this time next year, Brueckner will be charged, then the party will truly be over for sceptics. Wolters has solved the case. So he said anyway. Although, he doesn't have much of anything to say right now.

[Eleanor]

Wolters can prove Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by Christian Brueckner. He's just got to get his other crimes dealt with first. Madeline will just have to wait. But, mark my words, this time next year, Brueckner will be charged, then the party will truly be over for sceptics. Wolters has solved the case. So he said anyway. Although, he doesn't have much of anything to say right now.

While you as usual talk a pile of claptrap with nothing sensible to say at all.

In fact you are The Sceptics worst enemy and serving to prove that Sceptics are all raving bonkers.

[Brietta]

Some of us are not hoping to prove the McCanns did anything, and haven't said they did. I don't know what happened to that little girl, but I do know that there wasn't definitive evidence that a stranger entered 5A and abducted her.

One would have hoped you would have got over your angst by now.  It has been over sixteen years by now.

Maybe you should think of taking a more proactive solution.  Madeleine's parents did.  And lo and behold, all these years down the line their efforts have resulted in a suspect being in the frame.

Work it out!  A criminal - a paedophile - a rapist!  What's not to like about this person?  Well we'll maybe find out a little more once we hear about the five charges for crimes against women and children that he's doing his best to keep out of court.

[Brietta]

While you as usual talk a pile of claptrap with nothing sensible to say at all.

In fact you are The Sceptics worst enemy and serving to prove that Sceptics are all raving bonkers.

You've never said a truer word.

[Eleanor]

You've never said a truer word.

Thank You.  Am I right or am I right?  Some of them even "Like" Spammy's mad ramblings.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The media said Mr Smith withdrew that allegation; but he didn't. Many people think he was mistaken, but are prepared to believe those who saw 'suspicious' people in PdL who, the media tell us, are now prepared to say it was CB they saw.

Did Mr Smith definitively say he saw Gerry McCann without doubt?  Because I seem to recall that he wasn't sure.  His sighting is evidence he saw someone  carrying a child, someone who he thought might be Gerry McCann based purely on the way he was carrying the child.  Given that numerous witnesses in this case have stated things with 100% certainty and proven wrong how much weight should we give the Smith sighting?   Is it evidence that Gerry McCann was involved in hiding his daughter's body at a time when others have put him at the restaurant?

[Wonderfulspam]

Did Mr Smith definitively say he saw Gerry McCann without doubt?  Because I seem to recall that he wasn't sure.  His sighting is evidence he saw someone  carrying a child, someone who he thought might be Gerry McCann based purely on the way he was carrying the child.  Given that numerous witnesses in this case have stated things with 100% certainty and proven wrong how much weight should we give the Smith sighting?   Is it evidence that Gerry McCann was involved in hiding his daughter's body at a time when others have put him at the restaurant?

Others place him at the tapas, that's their evidence, true. That would be exculpatory evidence. So, Smiths 60 to 80% ID would also be evidence, wouldn't it.