The Portuguese Police apologise to the McCanns.

[kizzy]

I think 3 kids might have been a bit of a handful for one abductor within a very limited time frame.

So it seems you believe he was working entirely on his own.

why do you think  he went for Maddie the heaviest  child.

In his very limited time frame also ....he took time to open a window...when both doors were open.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Admin I don’t pretend to know for a fact that the case against CB is BS.

But, you must admit it is a possibility..........

like every thing is in this case.every thing seems to be on the balance of probabilities ...

not always facts. or evidence.

EXCLUSIVE
NewsWorld News
MADDIE WORRY Madeleine McCann witness’s ‘bulls**t’ could DESTROY desperate battle for justice – his word ‘means nothing’, cops warned.

GERMAN cops have been warned that their case against the prime suspect in Madeleine McCann's disappearance could collapse due to their "Bulls***" witness.

The investigators' over-reliance on "tarnished" evidence from the key witness could destroy their fight for justice, insider sources claim.

The salient part of my post was “pretend to know”.  I don’t pretend to know whether or not the case is bs.  It might be, on the other hand it might not.  From all the information I know about CB  it would seem that he is a credible suspect.  Hope that makes my position crystal clear.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So it seems you believe he was working entirely on his own.

why do you think  he went for Maddie the heaviest  child.

In his very limited time frame also ....he took time to open a window...when both doors were open.

No idea.  Perhaps he flipped a coin to decide which child to nick.  Perhaps he had certain predelictions that led him to make the choice he did.  Perhaps he did have an accomplice, perhaps he didn’t, both possible, plausible even.  It takes a few seconds to open a window, why an abductor might do so has been discussed ad nauseam.  Anything else you want me to answer?

[kizzy]

No idea.  Perhaps he flipped a coin to decide which child to nick.  Perhaps he had certain predelictions that led him to make the choice he did.  Perhaps he did have an accomplice, perhaps he didn’t, both possible, plausible even.  It takes a few seconds to open a window, why an abductor might do so has been discussed ad nauseam.  Anything else you want me to answer?

OR maybe he didn't take any...because he wasn't there.

Obviously you think it CB ...........all your eggs in one basket with the latest patsy it seems.

[Lace]

So it seems you believe he was working entirely on his own.

why do you think  he went for Maddie the heaviest  child.

In his very limited time frame also ....he took time to open a window...when both doors were open.

It would have been extremely difficult to control two small toddlers.  He took the child that could be easily tricked,  maybe he said he was taking her to her parents,  who knows.  I'm still wondering if he sold her.   Easier to sell than two little ones.

[Wonderfulspam]

It would have been extremely difficult to control two small toddlers.  He took the child that could be easily tricked,  maybe he said he was taking her to her parents,  who knows.  I'm still wondering if he sold her.   Easier to sell than two little ones.

Don't you believe Wolters then? Why Not?  He says Brueckner murdered her. Not once has he suggested she was sold.

[kizzy]

It would have been extremely difficult to control two small toddlers.  He took the child that could be easily tricked,  maybe he said he was taking her to her parents,  who knows.  I'm still wondering if he sold her.   Easier to sell than two little ones.

Or, maybe he wasn't even there.

[jassi]

It would have been extremely difficult to control two small toddlers.  He took the child that could be easily tricked,  maybe he said he was taking her to her parents,  who knows. I'm still wondering if he sold her.   Easier to sell than two little ones.

Who knows, but if he did, then he didn't murder her, which leaves Wolters theory high and dry.

[Eleanor]

Who knows, but if he did, then he didn't murder her, which leaves Wolters theory high and dry.

I am also still wondering if Brueckner sold Madeleine.  Or Abducted her to order.  But then my comprehension of his mind is limited.  But in so far as we know he has only physically harmed adults as yet.  Not that there will be any more of that after the Five Charges have been dealt with.

[Vertigo Swirl]

OR maybe he didn't take any...because he wasn't there.

Obviously you think it CB ...........all your eggs in one basket with the latest patsy it seems.

And all your eggs are in another basket marked McCann, and none of your eggs are ever going to hatch, so ner ner ner ner ner.
Such is the childish nonsense this forum has been reduced to. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Anyway. If anyone deserves an apology, it isn't the McCanns, it's Christian Bruckner. Wolters owes him an apology for his libellous smears.

[Lace]

I am also still wondering if Brueckner sold Madeleine.  Or Abducted her to order.  But then my comprehension of his mind is limited.  But in so far as we know he has only physically harmed adults as yet.  Not that there will be any more of that after the Five Charges have been dealt with.

I don't believe it was a burglary gone wrong.  He was watching 5a he knew all their moves,  he knew the children were left by themselves.

The man seen watching the apartment was wearing a leather jacket,  CB wore a leather jacket.  The description of the man matched CB.


He told his girlfriend he had a horrible job to do next day.  That was May 4th.

His phone rang near 5a on the night of 5th of May.

He has said himself he is a business man.

He went somewhere 5th of May.

He was a drug smuggler,  so knew some very dodgy people.

[Wonderfulspam]

I don't believe it was a burglary gone wrong.  He was watching 5a he knew all their moves,  he knew the children were left by themselves.

The man seen watching the apartment was wearing a leather jacket,  CB wore a leather jacket.  The description of the man matched CB.


He told his girlfriend he had a horrible job to do next day.  That was May 4th.

His phone rang near 5a on the night of 5th of May.

He has said himself he is a business man.

He went somewhere 5th of May.

He was a drug smuggler,  so knew some very dodgy people.

The e fit looks nothing like Brueckner though. It must have been his accomplice, who also wore a leather jacket.

[Brietta]

And all your eggs are in another basket marked McCann, and none of your eggs are ever going to hatch, so ner ner ner ner ner.
Such is the childish nonsense this forum has been reduced to.

Wholeheartedly in agreement with that 🙄

[Wonderfulspam]

We'll have to start taking the case seriously when Brueckner is charged.