Thankyou to the forum

[amaraltheofficeboy]

for removing those videos.

[gilet]

for removing those videos.

A shame that my reviews also disappeared.

Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?

[icabodcrane]

for removing those videos.

A shame that my reviews also disappeared.

Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?

Your reviews are redundant now

...  that's the price of censorship

[gilet]

for removing those videos.

A shame that my reviews also disappeared.

Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?

Your reviews are redundant now

...  that's the price of censorship

Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.

[sadie]

I dont see why they should be.

Gilet exposed lies.

Those exposees should remain, to show what is out there ... cos I bet HiDehoi hasn't removed her lying propagnada from the internet

Why are you so keen to hide the exposee, Icabod?

[icabodcrane]

for removing those videos.

A shame that my reviews also disappeared.

Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?

Your reviews are redundant now

...  that's the price of censorship

Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.

I disagree

It's like reading a review of a book that has been banned,  which I have no opportunity to read myself 

What is the point of a  'review'  of subject matter I  have no access to ?

[gilet]

for removing those videos.

A shame that my reviews also disappeared.

Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?

Your reviews are redundant now

...  that's the price of censorship

Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.

I disagree

It's like reading a review of a book that has been banned,  which I have no opportunity to read myself 

What is the point of a  'review'  of subject matter I  have no access to ?

Don't be so utterly ridiculous. Are you trying to tell us that you are not aware that Hideho's videos the information where Hideho's videos are hosted? That you have completely failed to pick up that fact in all the reading you have done recently?

In exactly the same way that a reviewer mentions the theatre where a play may be viewed then my reviews can be amended to mention that Hideho's videos can be viewed in a particular place.

Then again perhaps you have failed to read carefully enough to pick up where the videos are available and maybe you are unfamiliar with reviews of, for example, theatre productions which prepare the viewer in advance for the pleasures or otherwise they may face. If that is the case I apologise but I have to say I did have you down as being just a tad more intelligent than such a person.

[sadie]

Lying propaganda was exposed.  There is no way it can be exposed on the internet as far as I am aware

gilets reviews should be reinstated pls Admin.  They are the only record, as far as I am aware, of the false information / propaganda being given out by these gawd awful videos fronted by an abomination of a drawing of Madeleine..

HiDeHo has flooded the internet with them.  !50 of the damned things.  Massive propaganda to entrap the unwary

[icabodcrane]

for removing those videos.

A shame that my reviews also disappeared.

Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?

Your reviews are redundant now

...  that's the price of censorship

Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.

I disagree

It's like reading a review of a book that has been banned,  which I have no opportunity to read myself 

What is the point of a  'review'  of subject matter I  have no access to ?

Don't be so utterly ridiculous. Are you trying to tell us that you are not aware that Hideho's videos the information where Hideho's videos are hosted? That you have completely failed to pick up that fact in all the reading you have done recently?

When you post such idiocy then you really do yourself no favours at all. It makes you look silly.

In exactly the same way that a reviewer mentions the theatre where a play may be viewed then my reviews can be amended to mention that Hideho's videos can be viewed in a particular place.

Then again perhaps you have failed to read carefully enough to pick up where the videos are available and maybe you are unfamiliar with reviews of, for example, theatre productions which prepare the viewer in advance for the pleasures or otherwise they may face. If that is the case I apologise but I have to say I did have you down as being just a tad more intelligent than such a person.

Calm down gilet 

I know you're upset that posts you put a great deal of effort into compiling have disappeared  (  and I understand that  )  ...  but the rebuttals are no longer relevent,  given that the subject matter you were rebutting has disappeared itself

Do you not see that  ? 

[gilet]

for removing those videos.

A shame that my reviews also disappeared.

Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?

Your reviews are redundant now

...  that's the price of censorship

Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.

I disagree

It's like reading a review of a book that has been banned,  which I have no opportunity to read myself 

What is the point of a  'review'  of subject matter I  have no access to ?

Don't be so utterly ridiculous. Are you trying to tell us that you are not aware that Hideho's videos the information where Hideho's videos are hosted? That you have completely failed to pick up that fact in all the reading you have done recently?

When you post such idiocy then you really do yourself no favours at all. It makes you look silly.

In exactly the same way that a reviewer mentions the theatre where a play may be viewed then my reviews can be amended to mention that Hideho's videos can be viewed in a particular place.

Then again perhaps you have failed to read carefully enough to pick up where the videos are available and maybe you are unfamiliar with reviews of, for example, theatre productions which prepare the viewer in advance for the pleasures or otherwise they may face. If that is the case I apologise but I have to say I did have you down as being just a tad more intelligent than such a person.

Calm down gilet 

I know you're upset that posts you put a great deal of effort into compiling have disappeared  (  and I understand that  )  ...  but the rebuttals are no longer relevent,  given that the subject matter you were rebutting has disappeared itself

Do you not see that  ?

Don't try to be patronising. I am perfectly calm as my reasoned posts demonstrate.

No. I do not see that at all and I have clearly explained my reasoning as to why I do not see that.

As you are ignoring my reasoning and the points I have carefully laid out to explain it or you have simply failed to understand the very clear points I have made and seem merely intent on repeating the same question ad infinitum (now two repeats and the original) then there is little more to be said to you other than go back and read slowly because my answer is in plain English and I am certain that others can understand where you have failed.

[icabodcrane]

for removing those videos.

A shame that my reviews also disappeared.

Do I have permission to repost the reviews? Or can the posts be re-instated without the link?

Your reviews are redundant now

...  that's the price of censorship

Not at all. That would imply that reviews to TV shows that you have not seen, Theatre productions you may never even get a chance to see or which you did not fully follow, and other similar reviews which don't offer direct access to the original film, video, play etc. are always redundant too. However they are not. They can provide guidance for potential viewers and food for thought for others who have seen the material but not picked up on some of the issues within it.

I disagree

It's like reading a review of a book that has been banned,  which I have no opportunity to read myself 

What is the point of a  'review'  of subject matter I  have no access to ?

Don't be so utterly ridiculous. Are you trying to tell us that you are not aware that Hideho's videos the information where Hideho's videos are hosted? That you have completely failed to pick up that fact in all the reading you have done recently?

When you post such idiocy then you really do yourself no favours at all. It makes you look silly.

In exactly the same way that a reviewer mentions the theatre where a play may be viewed then my reviews can be amended to mention that Hideho's videos can be viewed in a particular place.

Then again perhaps you have failed to read carefully enough to pick up where the videos are available and maybe you are unfamiliar with reviews of, for example, theatre productions which prepare the viewer in advance for the pleasures or otherwise they may face. If that is the case I apologise but I have to say I did have you down as being just a tad more intelligent than such a person.

Calm down gilet 

I know you're upset that posts you put a great deal of effort into compiling have disappeared  (  and I understand that  )  ...  but the rebuttals are no longer relevent,  given that the subject matter you were rebutting has disappeared itself

Do you not see that  ?

Don't try to be patronising. I am perfectly calm as my reasoned posts demonstrate.

No. I do not see that at all and I have clearly explained my reasoning as to why I do not see that.

As you are ignoring my reasoning and the points I have carefully laid out to explain it or you have simply failed to understand the very clear points I have made and seem merely intent on repeating the same question ad infinitum (now two repeats and the original) then there is little more to be said to you other than go back and read slowly because my answer is in plain English and I am certain that others can understand where you have failed.

I wasn't patronising,  I was  sympathising  ...  in truth,  I was

[Admin]

Please note:  The threads have not been deleted because they contain some really good posts within them as members have gone to a lot of trouble.  As such we are keeping them in the archive for the moment to see if HiDeHo has the good grace to respond.

If she fails to do so we will reinstate the comments but not the actual videos where they are deemed to be misleading and/or inaccurate.

We might run a poll on this as well to gauge opinion.  Thank you.

[gilet]

Please note:  The threads have not been deleted because they contain some really good posts within them as members have gone to a lot of trouble.  As such we are keeping them in the archive for the moment to see if HiDeHo has the good grace to respond.

If she fails to do so we will reinstate the comments but not the actual videos where they are deemed to be misleading and/or inaccurate.

We might run a poll on this as well to gauge opinion.  Thank you.

Thank you for that information.

[Admin]

If anyone has any suggestions on the best way to take this issue forward we would be grateful to hear them.

[gilet]

If anyone has any suggestions on the best way to take this issue forward we would be grateful to hear them.

I have no idea if she has used a serious email address to access the forum but if she has, perhaps an email could be sent asking if she intends to respond or not?