Now more posts here than in the Jeremy Bamber Forum!!!!

[debunker]

What a waste of bandwidth!!

Nothing legal and real to discuss.

Just obsessed [ censored word ]s!

And to answer the question- if there were no [ censored word ]s I would not be here. Same cannot be said in reverse.

[Angelo222]

What a waste of bandwidth!!

Nothing legal and real to discuss.

Just obsessed [ censored word ]s!

And to answer the question- if there were no [ censored word ]s I would not be here. Same cannot be said in reverse.

Jeremy who??   

[Eleanor]

What a waste of bandwidth!!

Nothing legal and real to discuss.

Just obsessed [ censored word ]s!

And to answer the question- if there were no [ censored word ]s I would not be here. Same cannot be said in reverse.

Jeremy who??   

That bloke I thought was innocent until I joined this Forum.  Which just goes to show that even someone with my impressive IQ can be taken in.

[Joanne]

Are any of you members over there?

[Angelo222]

What a waste of bandwidth!!

Nothing legal and real to discuss.

Just obsessed [ censored word ]s!

And to answer the question- if there were no [ censored word ]s I would not be here. Same cannot be said in reverse.

Jeremy who??   

That bloke I thought was innocent until I joined this Forum.  Which just goes to show that even someone with my impressive IQ can be taken in.

Don't feel too bad Eleanor as he has taken in everyone who has ever come into contact with him but in the end they all see through him and that is true with the lawyers as well.  He dumps everyone like a rag doll when he tires of them. Julie Mugford was one of the first to find this out and there have been a long list of women taken in since then.

[Eleanor]

Are any of you members over there?

If you are talking about The Jeremy Bamber Forum then you are a Member there.  There are some other interesting things apart from Madeleine McCann.

[puglove]

Aren't there any [ censored word ]s in the Bamber forum?

Only "Lugg" (Gladys), really, he hates everybody. But he knows Sweet Felicity Arkwright about the Bamber case, his main interest is women having sex with dogs.

[Angelo222]

Aren't there any [ censored word ]s in the Bamber forum?

Only "Lugg" (Gladys), really, he hates everybody. But he knows Sweet Felicity Arkwright about the Bamber case, his main interest is women having sex with dogs.

Oh dear Shona.  Can I moderate you??   

[puglove]

Aren't there any [ censored word ]s in the Bamber forum?

Only "Lugg" (Gladys), really, he hates everybody. But he knows Sweet Felicity Arkwright about the Bamber case, his main interest is women having sex with dogs.

Oh dear Shona.  Can I moderate you??   

Ooh er, I don't know, you could try, I suppose!!

"She certainly tamed that horse, but who can tame her?"       

[Joanne]

Are any of you members over there?

If you are talking about The Jeremy Bamber Forum then you are a Member there.  There are some other interesting things apart from Madeleine McCann.

I wasn't asking myself.
Why did I know rejoining was going to be a mistake?

[Redblossom]

What a waste of bandwidth!!

Nothing legal and real to discuss.

Just obsessed [ censored word ]s!

And to answer the question- if there were no [ censored word ]s I would not be here. Same cannot be said in reverse.

Nothing real? Or legal? To discuss? Gosh your parametres of anything significant, real or pertinent, seem extremely narrow, but still, each to their own. It is a cold case, the parents are public figures continually speaking out in the media, the public and others have a right to reply.

As for obsessed [ censored word ]s, in case it escaped your attention, 75% of people at a rough guess on here are not 'mccann [ censored word ]s' as you put it,  not that it is true that everyone who doubts their story is a [ censored word ], but 'mccann supporters'

I think you may be better utilised on facebook pages such as This Morning, and The Wright Stuff, where today the general public have posted their views.

I am sure you can find the links and offer your wisdom.

[debunker]

Thank you for an excellent example of waste of bandwidth.

[ActualMat]

What a waste of bandwidth!!

Nothing legal and real to discuss.

Just obsessed [ censored word ]s!

And to answer the question- if there were no [ censored word ]s I would not be here. Same cannot be said in reverse.

Jeremy who??   

That bloke I thought was innocent until I joined this Forum.  Which just goes to show that even someone with my impressive IQ can be taken in.

It's happened to us all. :)

[Eleanor]

What a waste of bandwidth!!

Nothing legal and real to discuss.

Just obsessed [ censored word ]s!

And to answer the question- if there were no [ censored word ]s I would not be here. Same cannot be said in reverse.

Jeremy who??   

That bloke I thought was innocent until I joined this Forum.  Which just goes to show that even someone with my impressive IQ can be taken in.

It's happened to us all. :)

Well, I was a teensy bit cross with myself.  I really ought to know better by now. 
I actually got briefly taken in by The Dogs Videos, until I saw the unedited versions.  Those that hadn't been edited by Lover Boy, Duarte Levy, Journalist.  Not his real name by the way.

[debunker]

Whatever the facts, his verdict was on a 10-2 majority which I for one will never accept is fair and equitable.