Limited Company and Private Investigators

[gavdalf]

What we actually know

3rd May 2007 - A little girl is missing, not with her parents

12/05/07 - Parents set up ltd company 9 days later - to date roughly received £5.79m, company accounts are there for all to see.

Met review - announced that it had agreed to bring its expertise to the case at the request of home secretary  12/05/2011.

I know the above may seem very simplistic, but they are certainly the certainly facts. And can be backed up with the information we can find

Im not pro this or anti that, the entire situation is very sad. Please if there is anything else we actually know as fact. please would you highlight them for me

thanks and pleased to meet you all

[AnneGuedes]

What we actually know

12/05/07 - Parents set up ltd company 9 days later - to date roughly received £5.79m, company accounts are there for all to see.

The accounts don't show how the money was spent, but, as a LTD, they don't have to.

[gavdalf]

What difference does that really make? Its a honest question? Im not trying to be argumentative,  surely they were spent looking for Madeline?

[AnneGuedes]

Hello Gavdalf !
There's searching and searching. Of course spending money on PI is always a risk, but in this particular case Madeleine's Fund was crooked a bit above any probability.. Isn't it surprising that the Fund wasn't reactive ?

[gavdalf]

Hello Anne

indeed spending money on PI's would be risky, as it will always be in essence as they maynot find anything so in essence you can pay for nothing I suppose,  I haven't been able to see all the documents  relating to these but haven't some been arrested.

I don't know but it always struck me as a very very fast procedure, I must correct my earlier post myself in which I stated 9 days, it was actually 12 days

so we can assume which is not evidence or fact, that someone somewhere between the night of the 3rd and 15th came up with the idea to set up a ltd company , and of course we all know what to assume can be

first off you would need to apply for it, setup company bank accts which would require a anti money laundering process, submission of documents etc.

The main aspect which sometimes appears to take a back seat to the debating,  theorising and really just arguing is that unfortunately a child is missing, which upsets me

[muratfan]

Perhaps if the Fat Defective didn't just concentrate everything in trying to fit up the McCanns, then maybe, just maybe, the PJ would have looked for Madeleine elsewhere. By trying to blame the parents, and just focusing on that line of enquiry, then he let the person (s) who took Madeleine get away.

Amaral (imho) is as guilty as the abductor

[Admin]

Yes, but guilty of what?

[muratfan]

Wel Amral guilty of letting her down , not doing his duty properly... And possibly, allowing her to come to her fate, whatever it may be

[icabodcrane]

Wel Amral guilty of letting her down , not doing his duty properly... And possibly, allowing her to come to her fate, whatever it may be

I believe Amaral, and the Portuguese investigation was incompetent in many ways,  but he cannot be accused of  being guilty of the fate the little girl suffered

The fateful event had already occured before Amaral was even aware of the McCann's existence

[gavdalf]

Wel Amral guilty of letting her down , not doing his duty properly... And possibly, allowing her to come to her fate, whatever it may be

hello, could the same sentence in your post be applied to the parents? an honest question

I would like to point out Ive never accused them of anything because lets be honest, with the evidence and facts we have, we all know pretty much nothing

[Carana]

Hello Gavdalf !
There's searching and searching. Of course spending money on PI is always a risk, but in this particular case Madeleine's Fund was crooked a bit above any probability.. Isn't it surprising that the Fund wasn't reactive ?

Why do you say that and what do you base that opinion on?

[Admin]

For the record, does anyone have the details for this Limited Company?

[Joanne]

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id58.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id205.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id303.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id352.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id394.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id425.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id429.html
They're the annual accounts and other information, year by year and
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id405.html
thats a review and investigation of the accounts.

[icabodcrane]

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id58.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id205.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id303.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id352.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id394.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id425.html
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id429.html
They're the annual accounts and other information, year by year and
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id405.html
thats a review and investigation of the accounts.

Thanks for bringing us those Joanne

The last link makes for a very interesting read   ( is Enid O'Dowd a journalist ? ) 

[Joanne]

Enid O'Dowd is a chartered accountant.