the cult of personality

[muratfan]

[Mo Stache]

Not forgetting, compare the amount or portion of the general population who all signed a petition (to Downing Street) to ask for a review of the case.

I would think any sane adult would support a review if it brought an end to this case. There is, however, no implicit support of he McCanns, because of that.

Admin
Please indicate how this post was edited and why, thank you.

I forgot to give the edit note -
Last Edit: Today at 07:16:26 PM by Admin »

[Redblossom]

Hmm - someone who thinks Madeleine is the second coming versus someone who would be gutted if she was found alive. The former view is certainly a bit strange, the latter view is just downright evil though, wouldn't you agree?

and how do yu know the context of that tweet, what was said before and after? Isnt it possible they were thinking they didnt want her to be alive if she was some sex slave eg??? Not defending it, I dont know why they posted that,but its no worse if that was the case than some [ censored word ] sayng madeleines disappearance is a sign that  jesus is coming back to earth!! And kate and gerry are the chosen ones and setting out reasons why they were


Oh dear

[Mrs. B]

There are so many more examples of posts like that, in fact, you only need to go to twitter & look at that tag, there's even one utterly deranged person who keeps posting pictures of Madeleine that she's removed the colour from & is insisting it's a photo of a dead child.

[Redblossom]

There are so many more examples of posts like that, in fact, you only need to go to twitter & look at that tag, there's even one utterly deranged person who keeps posting pictures of Madeleine that she's removed the colour from & is insisting it's a photo of a dead child.

Thats what you get in the world wide web especially in a high profile case, again, to brush all doubters of the story with the same brush is not on, not sure why you continue to do it tbh

[muratfan]

Chris Steadman posted a picture of  rotting child corpse and said it was Madeleine.

Debbie Butler said she didn't want Madeleine found, as she would have to apologise then.

[Mo Stache]

Don't even know what you are on about tbh but I read earlier that there's one in your camp who think Simon Cowell is the Anti Christ, but I guess that doesn't apply to everybody.

But Simon Cowell has never been involved in this case and I am sure the comment was not in relation to his involvement, but an off the cuff general comment, so not a good example for your argument


http://nigelnessling.wordpress.com/madeleine-and-rennes-le-chateau-part-3/

Here you go, by poster called vee8 on various pro forums/blogs

Would you agree that that post on that blog is the opinion of the person who wrote it? That he/she is allowed his/her freedom of opinion? Where does it state that she/he represents all the pro McCann's?

How do you draw parallels between groups of people on Facebook and Twitter who have organised a campaign against the McCann's with one persons opinion. 

[Redblossom]

There are no circumstances which excuse someone from admitting they would be gutted if a missing child was found alive - none at all.  Those who attempt to defend what was said by that repulsive and foul-mouthed  individual (& he/she is something of a cult hero amongst the McCann "sceptics") reveal the mindset at work in the Anti camp quite well.

As I suggested earlier, there are, not that I know whether those applied to said tweet, and again, your labelling all *anti* mccanns in the same way as that particular individual if he meant what he said at face value, says more about you than anyone else, and is utterly disingenuous and irrational IMHO

[registrar]

Chris Steadman posted a picture of  rotting child corpse and said it was Madeleine.

Debbie Butler said she didn't want Madeleine found, as she would have to apologise then.

The rot set in very early on

recall this cunning stunt by a local 'artist'?

[Redblossom]

Chris Steadman posted a picture of  rotting child corpse and said it was Madeleine.

Debbie Butler said she didn't want Madeleine found, as she would have to apologise then.

and? Why should anyone else have to take responsibility or apologise for them? Or be tarred withsame brush? No reason except to discredit ALL people who have doubts usingthe actions and words of an extremely small minority who do  such things

how is running blogs posting pictures of doubters and their families and outing internet posters real names and other info about them and making posts here about peoples mothers any better? All because they wont accept blindly whattheyare told? Dont you find that despicable? nothng short of underhanded intimidation

[Redblossom]

Don't even know what you are on about tbh but I read earlier that there's one in your camp who think Simon Cowell is the Anti Christ, but I guess that doesn't apply to everybody.

But Simon Cowell has never been involved in this case and I am sure the comment was not in relation to his involvement, but an off the cuff general comment, so not a good example for your argument


http://nigelnessling.wordpress.com/madeleine-and-rennes-le-chateau-part-3/

Here you go, by poster called vee8 on various pro forums/blogs

Would you agree that that post on that blog is the opinion of the person who wrote it? That he/she is allowed his/her freedom of opinion? Where does it state that she/he represents all the pro McCann's?

How do you draw parallels between groups of people on Facebook and Twitter who have organised a campaign against the McCann's with one persons opinion.

there is no parallel with one persons views and any group, you said it well, theres your answer

[Redblossom]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-563743/Madeleine-One-year-Praia-da-Luz--prayers-collages-bizarre-mannequin-missing-girl.html

[Mo Stache]

Don't even know what you are on about tbh but I read earlier that there's one in your camp who think Simon Cowell is the Anti Christ, but I guess that doesn't apply to everybody.

But Simon Cowell has never been involved in this case and I am sure the comment was not in relation to his involvement, but an off the cuff general comment, so not a good example for your argument


http://nigelnessling.wordpress.com/madeleine-and-rennes-le-chateau-part-3/

Here you go, by poster called vee8 on various pro forums/blogs

Would you agree that that post on that blog is the opinion of the person who wrote it? That he/she is allowed his/her freedom of opinion? Where does it state that she/he represents all the pro McCann's?

How do you draw parallels between groups of people on Facebook and Twitter who have organised a campaign against the McCann's with one persons opinion.

there is no parallel with one persons views and any group, you said it well, theres your answer

You have missed a crucial point which is - who have organised a campaign against the McCann's - in that post.

[registrar]

Chris Steadman posted a picture of  rotting child corpse and said it was Madeleine.

Debbie Butler said she didn't want Madeleine found, as she would have to apologise then.

The rot set in very early on

recall this cunning stunt by a local 'artist'?

Never seen that before - what's going on there?

a mannequin put up by a local 'artist' 365 days after Madeleine's disappearance - a stone's throw from Luz church -of all places

[Redblossom]

The reason why Anti McCanns get tarred with the same brush as these vile individuals we have mentioned is that they very rarely protest about the vile shite that these deranged commentators write and tweet.  Oh no, quite the opposite - they praise and applaud instead and follow them assiduously on twitter and FB - implicit approval in other words.  That tells you all you need to know.

they, they, they, as said a million times before, the some they do not equal all they, and nothing you say will change that, in fact its quite insulting, also not all people post on twitter and facebook, and for the record when i was on facebook for a few weeks on that controversy group i did challenge lots of posters on their comments and correct their misconceptions, there a small number of core people who post objectionable  stuff day in day out, that goes for YOUR camp as well, why dont you go act as policeman if your so worried about it, alternatively you canjust accept that some people will post things you dont like and the freedom of the internet allows this and just ignore it, RATHER than USING it to beat others up with