Author Topic: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?  (Read 39656 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mrs. B

Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #45 on: June 07, 2013, 12:10:28 AM »
Are you being paid?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #46 on: June 07, 2013, 12:15:40 AM »
Are you being paid?

For the work I do, of course. Aren't you ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mrs. B

Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #47 on: June 07, 2013, 12:23:22 AM »
For the work I do, of course. Aren't you ?

Oh is it your work? I thought it was your hobby.

Offline Carana

Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #48 on: June 07, 2013, 06:50:46 AM »

Madeleine Case - A Pact of Silence SOL
 
By Felicia Cabrita and Margarida Davim
30 June 2007
 
Madeleine's parents and the friends with whom they spent their holidays in PDL are suspects in the inquiry. There are contradictory versions about the night of the kidnapping, and an assumed pact of silence in the group.
 
The beginning of June is flowing in a strange way in the Algarve. A chilly wind and overhead clouds help to fill the auditorium of Lagos, where a solidarity concert is being held for the missing English girl. It's been a month since Madeleine McCann vanished without a trace.
 
A few kilometres from Lagos, in the Ocean Club resort at Praia da Luz, the faint illumination further densifies the climate. At the reception, which leads to the Tapas restaurant, there is nobody. Getting inside is easy.
 
A Portuguese waiter, but with a British 'behaviour', strikes the first blow on the journalist's plan: "We only serve dinner to the club's clients". "What about a drink?". He says yes.
 
It's 9.30 p.m. If we were to believe the several members of the McCann's holiday group, and after several mismatching versions, at this time Madeleine was being carried out of her apartment by a dark-haired man, who would be around 35 years old.
 
From the same table where the group of nine had dinner on that evening, one tries, in vain, to observe the apartment's front - a ground floor apartment that faces the restaurant. A linoleum screen on the side of Tapas and the corridor of bushes that follows the limits of the apartment's back yards prevents any vigilance to that level.
 
The image of Madeleine - big blue, questioning eyes and an innocent smile, fixed on the photographic films - is always present. It doesn't leave the conversations of whom passes by. One remembers the words that the mother, Kate Healy, is supposed to have said to a friend (and that the husband, Gerry McCann, did not know): "I had a bad premonition about my children, when I found out the Ocean Club had no baby listening service".
 
The choice of Algarve as a holiday destination would come to change their lives. Everything was arranged with three other couples, with whom they used to travel. Some of them had recently been to Greece, with their children, and the Mark Warner agency, the same that prepared their trip to the Algarve, had done their itinerary for the islands. According to their reports, the hotel where they stayed had a baby listening service - a service that is assured by four or five members of staff who would control the children while the adults dined, by listening through doors and windows to confirm that everything inside was quiet.
 
At the Tapas bar, from bartenders to staff from the Kid Club, criticism is whispered: "We have a creche where they left their children for most part of the day, where they could be until 11.30 p.m. without spending another Euro. They could also have used our baby-sitters, who stay with the children in their rooms until 1 p.m. In this case, they would have to pay an extra fee, but these people looked like they could afford it", an employee comments, concluding that "this was a very strange group, that never stayed with their children".
 
The children's routine
 
The story of Madeleine looks like a tangled ball of wool. In the last days of April, Kate and Gerry, both 39 and doctors, arrive with their friends in Praia da Luz. The weather is not very good, but the group makes the best of it. The children seem to exist outside of the adults' world. In the morning, Kate would take Madeleine, almost 4, and the 2-year old twins, to the Kids Club. The other couples in the group did the same. While the little ones entertained themselves with collages and paintings, the group divided itself between tennis and jogging until lunchtime. In the creche, the girl's picture is taken: "She was shy and had some difficulty in adapting to the group. She always stayed close to the English children she already knew".
 
It is at lunchtime that the families socialize a bit. After a short nap, the children go back to the Kids Club, while the parents use the activities that the club offers. They only get to meet again in the late afternoon, when the children's dinner is served. Before 8 p.m., Madeleine and her siblings, who seem to function like a clock, are already asleep. Half an hour later, the group of friends meets at Tapas. The staff remember that they only leave at midnight: "They were very lively and drank a bit too much. I didn't even realise they had children, because I never saw them around".
 
Mathew Oldfield, one of the elements of the group, is back in England. He reacts with surprise upon the contact of Sol, but he does not avoid the conversation: "We drank. We were on holiday. So what?".
 
And thus the days followed one upon another, at the Ocean Club. The holiday week is almost over and the group's spirit does not change. Nobody had noticed until then, how the children were kept at a distance.
 
The most reliable way to undrestand what happened on May 3, when Madeleine disappeared, is to analyse the various versions that emerged.
 
It would have been 10 p.m. when Kate decided to check the children at the apartment. This is the only moment in the story that gathers consensus. Madeleine had vanished from her bedroom and the twins were sleeping like nothing had happened. The mother was back at the restaurant in one leap. She was disoriented.
 
PJ called two hours later
 
In seconds, the resort is in turmoil. The group's four men and the club's employees check every corner. They seem to be oblivious of the essential: to call the authorities. GNR is the first to arrive at the scene, but the news only reach Policia Judiciaria (PJ) more than two hours later. The first explanations arise. Where were the parents when the child disappeared? Gerry explains that, inspired in the scheme that some of the friends had used on their holidays in Greece, the nine members of the group took turns in checking on the children with some regularity.
 
This is the beginning of a story that will change in many chapters. Gerry starts by saying that he first left the table to check on the children around 9.05 p.m. When he entered the apartment the children were fine, he just noticed that the door to their bedroom was partially open. He looked at the window, which was closed, just as the shutters, and relaxed.
 
Ten minutes later, his friend Jane Tanner, who went around the apartments, crossed ways with a dark-haired man who was walking in the opposite direction, carrying a child. She didn't make any connections either.
 
A few minutes later, Mathew Oldfield enters the room, sees the McCann children fast asleep, and notices nothing out of the ordinary. It is at 10 p.m. that Maddie's mother discovers her daughter has disappeared. The window was wide open and the shutters were up.
 
To the GNR, who were in the area with sniffer dogs to search for the child, this is a highly unlikely scenario. One of the military assures: "This is an extremely silent area, where there are practically no passing cars. That shutter was very difficult to lift from the outside, and would have made a lot of noise. It would have been a lot easier to use the door, but there were no signs of a break-in".
 
This was just one of the reasons why the group became suspicious in the eyes of the investigators. Russell O'Brien, Jane Tanner's husband, is already back in England, but he knows he could be summoned back to Portugal for a deposition anytime. Over the phone with Sol, he tries to keep his British phlegm: "It is normal that we are suspects, and the DNA test is a consequence thereof. We were the closest people involved".
 
The conversation always comes back to the same issue: the night of the disappearance. The account of that last dinner has disparate versions among the group's members. Some swear that someone left the table every half hour to check on the kids; other reduce that time to half of it. Some say control is made window by window; others say the adults entered each other's apartments.
 
One of the employees that was on duty that evening does not remember a lot of movement: "I only remember a tall, grey-haired man getting up once from the table". It was Russell, who, two days earlier, also had attended dinner.
 
An aerobic instructor from the resort entertains the dinner guests at Tapas with a `Quiz'. At 9.30 p.m. the game ends, and Gerry invites her to their table, where she stays for half an hour. During that time, as she later confided to friends, nobody left the table, but one of the chairs was vacant. Najova Chekaya refuses to talk to Sol. And Russell, when the questions start to surround him, loses his sympathy: "I have nothing further to tell you. I am not going to dishonor the promise I assumed with Kate and Gerry. They want to control all information that is disclosed".
 
Gerry changes his version several times, but he maintains that the door to his children's room was open. Matt revokes his first statement: when he entered Madeleine's room, the door was open and there was more light, as if the shutters had been raised. Here starts to develop the theory that there was already someone inside the apartment. Which reinforces Jane Tanner's version (that she saw a man carrying a child).
 
Only Jane saw the man carrying a child
 
But there is a witness whose deposition contradicts this theory. Jeremy Wilkins - a TV producer who had met Maddie's father during their holidays and used to play tennis with him - was walking his eight months old son at that time. He met Gerry, who went out through the apartment's back door after having checked on the children, and the two men exchanged a brief conversation. At that time, if one is to believe the first accounts, Jane would have left Tapas in the direction of the apartment's main entrance, and would have crossed paths with both of them. "It was a very narrow road and I think it would have been almost impossible to walk by without me taking notice", Jeremy says, pointing out the fact that he saw no man carrying a child, as Jane states.
 
But Jane continues to guarantee that, at the top of the street, she saw a man with a child in his arms.
 
Although the area is scarcely lit, and the situation did not make her suspicious at the time, she describes the beige trousers, the dark thick jacket and the black classic-style shoes in a detailed way. Once again, Jeremy disagrees: "If that happened, I would have likely seen it".
 
On the next day, the media circus was fully installed. The first reports are on Sky News first thing in the morning, even before portuguese press takes hold of the story. Journalists and locals dispute the information. Robert Murat, the son of an English mother and a Portuguese father, with little luck in business, does not waste the opportunity. He moves from failed businessman into the role of a translator for the press and the police. Some British journalists, after sucking him to the bones, start suspecting his availability.
 
The Murat contradiction
 
Contrarily to the GNR elements and the Ocean Club's staff, who participated in the searches on the night before and assure they did not see Murat around, Gerry and some of his friends guarantee that he was there. And thus he becomes an arguido.
 
Gerry and Kate's friends, who are interrogated tightly by the PJ over almost a month, refuse to clarify this contradiction, when asked by Sol. "We have a pact. This is our matter only. It is nobody else's business", says David Payne, another element with the group. Minutes after we tried to contact Kate, Gerry, in a fury, calls the Sol journalist: "What do you think you are doing? Do you think you're better than the Portuguese police? I'm going to forward your contact to PJ and you will have to explain yourselves".

-------

PJ says 'everybody is a suspect'
 
The director of the Policia Judiciaria in Faro, Guilhermino da Encarnacao, confirmed with Sol that "we do not discard the possibility of having the family and friends as suspects". This is always done "without neglecting other clues. Everybody who was at the resort at the time are suspects".

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id117.html

Offline Chinagirl

Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #49 on: June 07, 2013, 07:12:02 AM »
.... and thus began the innuendos and distortions, the myth of the "pact," the doubts about Jane Tanner, etc. which has continued to this day.

From where did Felicia Cabrita get the names and telephone numbers of the Tapas 9, despite the so-called judicial secrecy? 
A

Offline Mrs. B

Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #50 on: June 07, 2013, 09:05:04 AM »
There's a cached copy of the Timesonline article by David Smith James titled "Kate and Gerry McCann: Beyond the smears"  (the original article has been "amended" on McCannfiles & all reference to Cabrita replaced by a *. Odd that!)

The first public indication of police thinking came at the end of June when the magazine Sol published a story about the McCann group, casting doubts on their evidence and claiming they had undertaken a pact of silence. It was the first time the McCanns’ friends had been named in public, but Sol’s journalist Felicia Cabrita had their names and phone numbers and details from their witness statements. She had called them all, and at least one other witness, Jes Wilkins.
 
The information had been handed to Cabrita by the police – she says she acquired the material through good journalism, which in a sense it was – and her source is widely believed by her colleagues to have been the former head of the inquiry, Goncalo Amaral.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #51 on: June 07, 2013, 02:24:07 PM »
Not only did the PJ leak Kate's personal and private diaries.

They made alterations to what Kate wrote:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/23/leveson-inquiry-mccann-testimony-tabloids

Kate and Gerry McCann made an impassioned plea for press regulation after delivering an emotional account of their treatment by the tabloids, describing the string of "disgusting" and "offensive" stories published about them.

Appearing as witnesses at the Leveson inquiry into press standards, the McCanns gave the most powerful testimony heard so far, speaking for nearly two hours without a break as they described the ordeal they have been subjected to by parts of the media since their daughter Madeleine went missing in Portugal four years ago.

Kate McCann told a hushed courtroom at the Royal Courts of Justice in London how she felt "totally violated" after the publication by the News of the World of her personal diaries in which she recorded her thoughts about her missing daughter.

She said the now defunct newspaper had showed "absolutely no respect for me as a grieving mother" when it ran the story in September 2008 under the headline Kate's Diary: In Her Own Words. "I'd written these words, my thoughts, at the most desperate time of my life," she said.

Mrs McCann added that she had talked about "climbing into a hole and not coming out" after the article appeared. "It made me feel very vulnerable and small. That whole week was very traumatic and every time I thought about it I couldn't believe the injustice."

Her husband, Gerry, said the couple wanted an investigation into how the diary, which was seized and copied by Portuguese police, was leaked to the Murdoch tabloid. Lord Justice Leveson, who has legal powers to summon witnesses and compel evidence, indicated that he might heed their call.

Mr McCann said British newspapers had declared "open season" on them a few months after Madeleine's disappearance in the Portuguese resort of Praia da Luz in May 2007. It was "crass and insensitive", he argued, to say that because they engaged with the media in an attempt to find their daughter "the press can write whatever they like about you without punishment. There are standards but there are no penalties for not sticking to them. I see front page headlines every day … and I think information is being written and lives are being harmed by these stories and something has to change. The commercial imperative is not acceptable."

The McCanns' evidence is likely to strengthen the argument for a stricter regime of press regulation. Leveson, who was appointed by David Cameron at the height of the phone-hacking crisis, is due to report within a year.

The McCanns painted a disturbing picture of life at the centre of a media scrum. Gerry McCann said: "We expected the storm to calm with the passage of time but it continued day after day. We had anecdotal evidence from the British journalists in Praia da Luz that the story of Madeleine's disappearance had caught the imagination of the British public and was driving sales in the UK. As a result those journalists were under intense pressure from their newsdesks to file more copy."

Photographers camped outside the house, Kate McCann said, frightening their two young children. "There were several occasions where they would bang on the windows. Amelie said to me several times: 'Mummy, I'm scared.'"

Her husband accused a former editor of the News of the World, Colin Myler, of "berating" them for conducting a 2008 interview with Hello! magazine on the first anniversary of Madeleine's disappearance.

The couple sued Express Newspapers and secured unprecedented front-page apologies in 2008 after two of the group's titles ran stories which included the allegation that they had sold their daughter to pay off debts. Describing that as "nothing short of disgusting", Gerry McCann said he was amazed no one at Express Newspapers, which also paid the couple record damages of £550,000, had lost their job.

"I've seen no journalist or editor brought to account, be it the Express or any other group … they are repeat offenders, they should lose their privilege of practising," he said.

The McCanns argued that newspapers should not be allowed to take pictures of subjects when they are in public places. They also spoke movingly about their reaction to a front-page Daily Mirror story about Madeleine that declared: "She's dead". It was based on an article in a Portuguese paper, which quoted a source close to the police investigation who said they didn't know if she was alive or dead. Gerry McCann said they learned about the story at 11pm when they were just about to go to bed. "That was one of the most distressing headlines that was just taken from supposition. It was incredible."

Talking about her diary, Kate McCann said she believed that it was taken from her by Portuguese police and later returned. However, she said that someone must have photocopied the private diary and given it to the press.

She said there were minor differences between her own diaries and those that were published by the NoW, leading her to believe that they had been translated from Portuguese and back again.


The paper apologised a week after publishing the diaries and said: "We published the extracts in the belief held in good faith that we had Kate's permission to do so."

Leveson indicated that he might call the journalist who wrote the story to give evidence and might also question other senior executives at the paper, which was closed by Rupert Murdoch in July, about how the diaries were obtained.

Earlier in the day Sheryl Gascoigne, the former wife of Paul Gascoigne, told the inquiry that she had been hounded by press photographers while heavily pregnant. She said she was forced to crawl on her hand and knees while her arm was in a sling to escape the paparazzi.

Gascoigne told Leveson that everyone in the public eye knew that the Press Complaints Commission was "a waste of time". She said corrections should be given the same prominence in newspapers as the articles in which they originally appeared.

Mark Lewis, the solicitor whose clients include the footballers' union chief Gordon Taylor, Milly Dowler's parents and the ex-Premier League footballer Garry Flitcroft, also gave evidence to the inquiry.

He said he had been warned in a telephone call that Paul Dacre, editor-in-chief of the Daily Mail, would sue him if he continued to claim that the paper had been involved in phone hacking.

Lewis said that threat was made in a phone conversation with a Daily Mail lawyer, Liz Hartley, on 25 January 2011. "Be aware that Paul Dacre is someone who will sue you if you suggest that we were involved in hacking," Hartley allegedly told him.

He also claimed that he had heard from a journalist that Rebekah Brooks, former chief executive of News International, had threatened to "get him back" for demanding her resignation and that she would exact her revenge in another newspaper.



Online Eleanor

Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #52 on: June 07, 2013, 02:41:10 PM »

There is absolutely no doubt that information which was under Secrecy was leaked by The PJ.  Hopefully for money because any other reason for doing this could only have been to alter Public Opinion about The McCanns in a totally unfair manner, and then to probably influence a Jury should the case have come to Trial.. 
Whether or not it was Goncalo Amaral who did this is not clear, but there is also no question that he used this information to write his book before the case was shelved.  So therefor his book is based on false premise.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #53 on: June 07, 2013, 03:02:20 PM »
One detail that's always intrigued me is this correspondence between Amaral and the Portuguese forensic laboratory:

Letter to the National Forensics Institute (INML) from Goncalo Amaral


17th August 2007

The present inquiry is in relation to the investigation of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann on 3rd May from P da L.

The English authorities in possession of elements collected from the family home in Leicestershire, which are being examined in an unidentified laboratory, traced the girl's DNA profile, in annex to this document.

As it is necessary to the investigation we request the following:

1. Whether in the tests done by the INML Madeleine's profile was established?

2. In the case of a positive answer to point 1, that it should be determined whether the girl is the daughter of the parents identified ? Gerald Patrick McCann and Kate Healy.

3. Information about whether the profile obtained by the INML corresponds to the profile traced in the English laboratory, on the request of the British authorities.

4. If there are differences between the English and Portuguese profiles that a report should be drawn up for this inquiry.

5. In the follow-up of point 4, we request to be informed whether in the English profile the girl is the daughter of the McCann couple.

6. Other information that might be of use to the investigation.

Signed G. Amaral


And the bewildered response:

09-Processos Vol IX Page 2419

Vol IX Page 2419

Reply from the Forensics Institute (INML) to Goncalo Amaral

22-08-2007

Reply to Queries

- We inform you that none of the samples received by this institute were designated as supposedly belonging to the missing girl and we therefore, cannot reply to this query.


- Samples were studied - hair and a piece of cloth - nuclear DNA profiles only being obtained from 4 samples, which upon comparison with the DNA profiles of Kate and Gerry, could not belong to the girl.

- The samples were then studied using mitochondrial DNA analysis, the same was done for the other samples, giving the results in accordance with our report of 9th July No. 2007/000226 LX-BC.

- As requested in point 5, it was determined that the profile obtained by the British lab could belong to a son/daughter of the McCanns.

- The comparison of the profiles obtained in autossomic STR from Kate and Gerry McCann with the profile obtained was carried out.
Signed


Shortly afterwards it was leaked that Gerry was not Madeleine's father.

Coincidence?

Offline TTSOFAFM

Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #54 on: June 07, 2013, 03:06:31 PM »
Or more to the point retained by Goncalo Amaral.

Now if my memory serves me correctly the case was archived on the 21st July 2008.  Goncalo Amaral left the PJ on the 1st July 2008 and was removed from the case in October 2007.

The McCanns according to the Daily Record http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/portuguese-police-release-madeleine-mccann-985552 received their copies of the files on the 1st August 2008.

Goncalo's Book was published on the 28th July 2008.  Yet in Chapter 11, are sketches of Apartment 5A.

http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Amaral%20The%20Truth%20of%20The%20Lie%20Chapter%2011

Yes from memory you could get a sketch artist to draw the basics, but if you compare those photos to the files, you will see they are a pretty accurate copy of the original photos. 

So if the Files were not released to Journalists and given to the McCanns lawyers until after Goncalo's book was printed, how the hell are those drawings so accurate?  Could it be that Goncalo Amaral kept a copy of the files?  And we know that Lee Rainbow's report was read out in Court, again questioning how did this end up in the hands of Goncalo's lawyer?

Along with Kate's Diary finding its way to CdeM and then onto the News of the World, it does make you question whether Goncalo Amaral kept a copy of the files since leaving the PJ and whether this is ethical or not?  And for the life of me, if he was no longer on the case, if he kept a copy of the files, then why was he allowed to?

Online Eleanor

Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #55 on: June 07, 2013, 03:15:36 PM »

Difficult one to answer, TTSOFAFM, since we don't actually know.  Perhaps Goncalo Amaral has got a phenomenal memory.  Heaven forbid that I should suggest that he nicked some of the written diligences, that then passed by unnoticed because he left such a mess behind.

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #56 on: June 07, 2013, 05:00:48 PM »
Reading the article posted by Carana  ( A pact of silence Sol )  I would say there is no question at all that the Portuguese police were leaking information to Cabrita

Whether it was at Amaral's behest is unproven but certainly possible  ( likely even )

What strikes me about the article is it's remarkable accuracy  ...  now that we have the police files we can see that the details presented  are largely correct and truthful

So the information the police were leaking was factually accurate.

Why was this accurate information leaked  ?   ...  not for money, I think ...  perhaps to counteract the   inaccurate  misinformation being fed to the press from other sources     

Could that be what happened ?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #57 on: June 07, 2013, 05:04:06 PM »
Very interesting indeed, Icabodcrane. A thread of its own ?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #58 on: June 07, 2013, 06:51:31 PM »
Reading the article posted by Carana  ( A pact of silence Sol )  I would say there is no question at all that the Portuguese police were leaking information to Cabrita

Whether it was at Amaral's behest is unproven but certainly possible  ( likely even )

What strikes me about the article is it's remarkable accuracy  ...  now that we have the police files we can see that the details presented  are largely correct and truthful

So the information the police were leaking was factually accurate.

Why was this accurate information leaked  ?   ...  not for money, I think ...  perhaps to counteract the   inaccurate  misinformation being fed to the press from other sources     

Could that be what happened ?

Interesting thought. What came first, the chicken or the egg ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Why was peoples personal information sold/given to the press?
« Reply #59 on: June 07, 2013, 06:57:32 PM »
Interesting thought. What came first, the chicken or the egg ?
The egg of course, Faithlilly ! The Columbus's one.