How likely is it that Jane Tanner and the Smiths saw the 'same' man ?

[AnneGuedes]

A wild goose chase... Certainly, from the very beginning. And we're running, aren't we ?
But I'm not convinced by Innocentman. Oh, he certainly exists and is likely a sentimental person. But I can't figure out that man carrying on his arms a little child on such a long route from the creche.  I bet he never crossed Francisco GM and I bet the time he was around G5 wasn't 9:15 pm...
And I'm afraid this is exactly why RW invented the unbelievable demonstration of innocence through a rotten orange pyjama !

[Redblossom]

A wild goose chase... Certainly, from the very beginning. And we're running, aren't we ?
But I'm not convinced by Innocentman. Oh, he certainly exists and is likely a sentimental person. But I can't figure out that man carrying on his arms a little child on such a long route from the creche.  I bet he never crossed Francisco GM and I bet the time he was around G5 wasn't 9:15 pm...
And I'm afraid this is exactly why RW invented the unbelievable demonstration of innocence through a rotten orange pyjama !

what if Tanner was wrong about  the direction he was going?

[AnneGuedes]

what if Tanner was wrong about  the direction he was going?

Some people never know where are right and left, but do some mentally memorize a movement in the opposite way ?

[Redblossom]

Some people never know where are right and left, but do some mentally memorize a movement in the opposite way ?

No idea, just trying to make sense of SY saying Tannerman going home from creche at the time....which does not make any sense whatsoever if he was crossing left to right when Tanner saw him....

[AnneGuedes]

No idea, just trying to make sense of SY saying Tannerman going home from creche at the time....which dies nit make any sense whatsoever if he was crossing left to right when Tanner saw him....

It makes no sense at all actually and this is why RW took care of saying they were almost sure, but not sure.. Imo, this decision to innocent Tannerman was partly a wishful thinking and partly untying a anti-productive knot that hampered any progress.

[Redblossom]

It makes no sense at all actually and this is why RW took care of saying they were almost sure, but not sure.. Imo, this decision to innocent Tannerman was partly a wishful thinking and partly untying a anti-productive knot that hampered any progress.

Makes you think Redwood believed Oakley International and their report that the Tannerman sighting was given too  attention when  the Smithman sighting was more credible and finding out the efits were suppressed!!!
 >@@(*&)

[AnneGuedes]

Makes you think Redwood believed Oakley International and their report that the Tannerman sighting was given too  attention when  the Smithman sighting was more credible and finding out the efits were suppressed!!!
 >@@(*&)

I think so, the insistance on Tannerman, the release of faceless man much too late to have any impact, Ms Tanner being asked to re-enact the scene...I would be surprise that RW didn't notice. But I believe he has orders and I don't think he's the rebel kind !

[Redblossom]

I think so, the insistance on Tannerman, the release of faceless man much too late to have any impact, Ms Tanner being asked to re-enact the scene...I would be surprise that RW didn't notice. But I believe he has orders and I don't think he's the rebel kind !

I dont know...what is a rebel policeman? he is hard to read for sure...I agree he is not acting independently though......lets see

[pathfinder73]

How could JT pass Gerry and Jez without being seen  >@@(*&)

[pathfinder73]

Did Tannerman take the kid from the Kids Club No. 2 on this map? It would explain the direction in which Jane saw him walking? (straight up the road from the club and turn right and across where JT saw him)

[pegasus]

I think the kidsclub location marked "2" on the map is near the tapas bar and was used only for daytimes.

[AnneGuedes]

I think the kidsclub location marked "2" on the map is near the tapas bar and was used only for daytimes.

Yes. The night creche is 5

[John]

Did Tannerman take the kid from the Kids Club No. 2 on this map? It would explain the direction in which Jane saw him walking? (straight up the road from the club and turn right and across where JT saw him)

The child was too old to have been at that club.  I did read that he originated from the one above main reception (locations 4/5 on your plan).

[pathfinder73]

I think the kidsclub location marked "2" on the map is near the tapas bar and was used only for daytimes.

Yes. The night creche is 5

The child was too old to have been at that club.  I did read that he originated from the one above main reception (locations 4/5 on your plan).

Thanks so I wonder why Tannerman was going that way? SY would have covered that I presume. I can't work out how JT passed without being seen. Is there another exit from the tapas bar? Back to the files 

[AnneGuedes]

Thanks so I wonder why Tannerman was going that way? SY would have covered that I presume. I can't work out how JT passed without being seen. Is there another exit from the tapas bar? Back to the files 

Tannerman was an abductor, Pathfinder, and was logically coming from 5A.
We know nothing of Innocentman except for his child's rotten orange pyjama, the place he was walking from and his curly hair.