Author Topic: Why did Amaral and PJ suspect the McCanns and Murat as being somehow involved?  (Read 203759 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Luz

Wrong again. the MCCanns have been investigated portugal ruled there was no evidence of any crime. SY have also ruled them out.

If you read the Final Report from the Attorney General you may see that it clearly  says [paraphrasing], The McCanns failed to prove what they have claimed since the beginning, that they were innocent.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2013, 03:10:26 PM by John »

Offline Albertini

This statements supports those who believe that the 48 questions and the reconstruction were being used to incriminate the McCanns rather than help find maddie.

Are you suggesting they were being "fitted up"?

Offline Albertini

Hopefully once the SY investigation gets underway we will find out why SY do not consider the McCanns suspects in their investigation.

This is probably the first time i have agreed with you.

Let SY show us the evidence.

A bit worrying though that in two and a bit years they haven't got any suspects for abduction, don't you think?

Offline Mr Gray

Are you suggesting they were being "fitted up"?

I have never used the words fitted up. What a ridiculous thing to say.

Offline Mr Gray

This is probably the first time i have agreed with you.

Let SY show us the evidence.

A bit worrying though that in two and a bit years they haven't got any suspects for abduction, don't you think?

sorry, have you been discussing the case with them. You haven't got a clue what they have or haven't got

Offline Albertini

I have never used the words fitted up. What a ridiculous thing to say.

Well what do you mean when you said:

Quote
This statements supports those who believe that the 48 questions and the reconstruction were being used to incriminate the McCanns rather than help find maddie.
Quote
IMO and a lot of other people the PJ had give up looking for Maddie and were only interested in incriminating her parents, as your post confirms. thank god SY are taking over

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
During an Inquiry/criminal investigation, you are supposed to do everything in order to find the victim - in this case Madeleine McCann.
So simple ! This is how Mr Murat had his life turned upside down : he lived at a walking distance, in the direction taken by a walking abductor carrying a child in such a way that his muscular resistance wouldn't last more than 5 minutes. Mr Amaral didn't lose time to act  only because the life of a little girl was at stake and any minute counted.

Offline Albertini

sorry, have you been discussing the case with them. You haven't got a clue what they have or haven't got

What are you gibbering on about?

That's what i was asking, let's see what they have got to support abduction.

Offline Mr Gray

Well what do you mean when you said:

what I mean is that Amaral was convinced they were guilty. he had a gut feeling. I think he has admitted this as such, but he didn't have the evidence. I think he hoped to use the questioning to try and get Kate to admit her guilt.

Offline Albertini

what I mean is that Amaral was convinced they were guilty. he had a gut feeling. I think he has admitted this as such, but he didn't have the evidence. I think he hoped to use the questioning to try and get Kate to admit her guilt.

So..... they were trying to incriminate the Mccann's?

What's the difference between incriminating and "fitting up"?

Offline Luz

So simple ! This is how Mr Murat had his life turned upside down : he lived at a walking distance, in the direction taken by a walking abductor carrying a child in such a way that his muscular resistance wouldn't last more than 5 minutes. Mr Amaral didn't lose time to act  only because the life of a little girl was at stake and any minute counted.


According to the fantasistic description made by Jane Tanner, that so called abductor wouldn't last 30 sec holding 25/30 kg in arms up-leveled in front of his torso.

Offline Luz

what I mean is that Amaral was convinced they were guilty. he had a gut feeling. I think he has admitted this as such, but he didn't have the evidence. I think he hoped to use the questioning to try and get Kate to admit her guilt.

There was no gut feeling, there was evidence.

Offline Mr Gray

This is probably the first time i have agreed with you.

Let SY show us the evidence.

A bit worrying though that in two and a bit years they haven't got any suspects for abduction, don't you think?

this is your statement. How do you know what suspects SY have. I'm not gibbering on, its you who don't understand your own posts

Offline Mr Gray

There was no gut feeling, there was evidence.

have you given up on all the other ridiculous claims you have made in the last 30 mins. want to change the subject because you have been shown to be wrong

Offline Mr Gray

There was no gut feeling, there was evidence.

we have actually done this one to death. There is more evidence that the moon is a hollow spaceship...googleit