The Times of London ...

[Jazzy]

Await your proof
 

Until then shouldnt you just shut up? Unless you have it? Ta

Proof of what?

By the way,  uncalled for swearing really isn't conducive to good debate.

Noted!   

[Redblossom]

Proof of what?

By the way,  uncalled for swearing really isn't conducive to good debate.

your insinuations or accusations that anne guedes has skewed court proceeding reports


Do you have your own or others reports to back up your baseless gossip?


Ok if you dont like ...moderated...   

[Jazzy]

I'll ask again, proof of what. Last time I looked you weren't in chatge of who can post what. Your own gossip about  the parents of a missing child rather deprive you of any moral high ground.

[Redblossom]

I'll ask again, proof of what. Last time I looked you weren't in chatge of who can post what. Your own gossip about  the parents of a missing child rather deprive you of any moral high ground.

Irrelevancies struck through,

Youre the only one who brought up the issue of credibility vis a vis the court reports Anne Guedes has posted....then  further went on to say, in answer to John, that even without being paid cash as some reporters might be for juicier stories, you said she was biased, so....yes, before you make accusations or cast aspersions you  better have the proof that Anne has misreported the court proceedings, cant be that hard to understand now can it?

Oh and your gratitude is still missing

[Jazzy]

It's always irrelevant if you can't counter argue or bully your way out of it, isn't it?

[Redblossom]

It's always irrelevant if you can't counter argue or bully your way out of it, isn't it?

So you cant answer my response to your question of what proof? Why not? Its better to respond than throw dummies out

Unless you had a problem understanding somewhere.
 
maybe rereading might help
****

Youre the only one who brought up the issue of credibility vis a vis the court reports Anne Guedes has posted....then  further went on to say, in answer to John, that even without being paid cash as some reporters might be for juicier stories, you said she was biased, so....yes, before you make accusations or cast aspersions you  better have the proof that Anne has misreported the court proceedings, cant be that hard to understand now can it?

****

be back later for a rational response

[Mr Gray]

Irrelevancies struck through,

Youre the only one who brought up the issue of credibility vis a vis the court reports Anne Guedes has posted....then  further went on to say, in answer to John, that even without being paid cash as some reporters might be for juicier stories, you said she was biased, so....yes, before you make accusations or cast aspersions you  better have the proof that Anne has misreported the court proceedings, cant be that hard to understand now can it?

Oh and your gratitude is still missing

You do realise that this trial is about the right to cast aspersions without proof...perhaps you dont

[Jazzy]

Irony is lost on them

[Redblossom]

You do realise that this trial is about the right to cast aspersions without proof...perhaps you dont

You do realise you are derailing from Jazzys avoidance of answering questions, one  cant spout and then fail to back up their spouts,but cry bully when asked to, LoooL, its as simple as that...sigh...lets stick to one thing at a time hey?

[Jazzy]

Questions? So you have a question about my belief that reporting can be skewed to fit a particular viewpoint. That particular viewpoint is all over this forum. What else would you like to know?

By the way, have  a read back a bit yourself.
Anything you can't argue against or bully your way out of is always irrelevant to you, isn't it?

[icabodcrane]

Questions? So you have a question about my belief that reporting can be skewed to fit a particular viewpoint. That particular viewpoint is all over this forum. What else would you like to know?

By the way, have  a read back a bit yourself.
Anything you can't argue against or bully your way out of is always irrelevant to you, isn't it?

It really is rather churlish of you to reject legitimate information on the basis that it is being imparted by someone who does not share your opinions

We are fortunate on this forum to have a member who is attending court and making quite impressive notes that allow us first-hand access to what is happening

A little gratitude really would be in order 

[Redblossom]

Questions? So you have a question about my belief that reporting can be skewed to fit a particular viewpoint. That particular viewpoint is all over this forum. What else would you like to know?

By the way, have  a read back a bit yourself.
Anything you can't argue against or bully your way out of is always irrelevant to you, isn't it?

without any knowledge whatsoever you stuck your oar in and cast aspersions.....and for what? You got icky when a comment was made that asked you to post the accused or implied falsehoods, MOST people here were thankful for the court transcripts, you had to go make it ugly for your selfish little petty ends, end of.

[Jazzy]

It really is rather churlish of you to reject legitimate information on the basis that it is being imparted by someone who does not share your opinions

We are fortunate on this forum to have a member who is attending court and making quite impressive notes that allow us first-hand access to what is happening

A little gratitude really would be in order

Gratitude for whom?

Why would I be grateful?

Perceptions are influenced by perception and admiration.

[AnneGuedes]

MOST people here were thankful for the court transcripts

I've no doubt about that, Redblossom, but thank you for saying it.
As I told John, I did it "for the people", not "my people".

[Jazzy]

But with your own prejudice, obviously.