Author Topic: Exploring the reason why Dr Amaral wanted to exclude the Press from libel case.  (Read 23126 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
In what sense is libel not proved when Amaral's own lawyer doesn't know whether Madeleine is alive or dead?

That is the question, ferryman.  Surely his lawyer's comments drive a coach and horses through the book and the vile "defrosting remains" business?

ferryman

  • Guest
As with Bennett, Kate and Gerry McCann just want him to STOP, Sherlock.  It's not just the book and the film, Amaral has been touring round giving interviews to all and sundry promoting his lies.  They just want him to stop.

Indeed he has. 

Amaral claimed that there were "frozen cadaver remains" from the car.

Offline faithlilly

Cheers DCI.  Bit of a blooper from Amaral's lawyer there, eh!

More of a totally unnecessary trauma for the twins as they must now cope with their friends telling them they may be kidnapped at any moment.

You supporters really have no concern for those poor children, do you ? Point scoring against Amaral seems to be your only goal and to hell with the twins emotional welfare !
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
Indeed he has. 

Amaral claimed that there were "frozen cadaver remains" from the car.

This has proven to be rubbish, yet on and on he went - knowing it was rubbish.  Which proves that he does not give a stuff about Madeleine McCann. 

ferryman

  • Guest
 no concern for those poor children

Do you exempt yourself from the category, Faith ...

And d'accord, Rachel ...

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
More of a totally unnecessary trauma for the twins as they must now cope with their friends telling them they may be kidnapped at any moment.

You supporters really have no concern for those poor children, do you ? Point scoring against Amaral seems to be your only goal and to hell with the twins emotional welfare !

Not point scoring, faithlilly - simply telling the plain, unvarnished truth.

I care plenty about the McCann family, because I have empathy and compassion for people.

Can those who post foul insults about Madeleine's Mum and Dad say the same?

drummer

  • Guest
More of a totally unnecessary trauma for the twins as they must now cope with their friends telling them they may be kidnapped at any moment.

You supporters really have no concern for those poor children, do you ? Point scoring against Amaral seems to be your only goal and to hell with the twins emotional welfare !


How do you imagine that the friends of the twins will tell them they could be kidnapped at any moment? Do you think that the friends parents' are about to inform their children about this case and what has been said in court. That would be a lovely way to start the day as the kids eat their cornflakes wouldn't it? "Oh by the way kids did I mention the threats to kidnap your little playmates at school?

ferryman

  • Guest
Not point scoring, faithlilly - simply telling the plain, unvarnished truth.

I care plenty about the McCann family, because I have empathy and compassion for people.

Can those who post foul insults about Madeleine's Mum and Dad say the same?

Indeed.

The real trauma for the twins would be seeing their parents spend the next 25 years in a Portuguese prison for the crimes of others against Madeleine ...

Offline faithlilly

Not point scoring, faithlilly - simply telling the plain, unvarnished truth.

I care plenty about the McCann family, because I have empathy and compassion for people.

Can those who post foul insults about Madeleine's Mum and Dad say the same?

You talk the talk Rachel but you don't walk the walk and when push comes to shove when any decent, compassionate adult would want to protect the McCanns remaining children from the further trauma of seeing the headlines from the trial over the last couple of days, you supporters merely want to use the situation as a stick to beat Amaral with.

What do you REALLY care about more, the emotional welfare of the twins or the destruction of Amaral because from where I'm standing, to be honest, it's hard to tell ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
You talk the talk Rachel but you don't walk the walk and when push comes to shove when any decent, compassionate adult would want to protect the McCanns remaining children from the further trauma of seeing the headlines from the trial over the last couple of days, you supporters merely want to use the situation as a stick to beat Amaral with.

What do you REALLY care about more, the emotional welfare of the twins or the destruction of Amaral because from where I'm standing, to be honest, it's hard to tell ?

Has it been demonstrated that the McCanns had a say in whether proceedings should be in private or public?

Offline faithlilly


How do you imagine that the friends of the twins will tell them they could be kidnapped at any moment? Do you think that the friends parents' are about to inform their children about this case and what has been said in court. That would be a lovely way to start the day as the kids eat their cornflakes wouldn't it? "Oh by the way kids did I mention the threats to kidnap your little playmates at school?

You do know about the internet don't you drummer ? Or indeed adult conversations little ears shouldn't hear .
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Has it been demonstrated that the McCanns had a say in whether proceedings should be in private or public?

Yes it has.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?


Offline faithlilly

Where?

I'm sure if you have a scout around you'll find it ferryman.

ETA Just for you FM :

'We asked to the court to deal with this trial behind closed doors to protect anything about the disappearance of Maddie McCann, because we don't know if the girl is dead or alive. And we asked that, the McCanns opposed that and want the publicity of the trial.'
« Last Edit: September 22, 2013, 08:12:21 PM by Faithlilly »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
You talk the talk Rachel but you don't walk the walk and when push comes to shove when any decent, compassionate adult would want to protect the McCanns remaining children from the further trauma of seeing the headlines from the trial over the last couple of days, you supporters merely want to use the situation as a stick to beat Amaral with.

What do you REALLY care about more, the emotional welfare of the twins or the destruction of Amaral because from where I'm standing, to be honest, it's hard to tell ?

Yes I talk the talk.  I also walk the walk by finding it in my heart to have empathy and compassion for a struggling family.

You talk about the "destruction of Amaral", let's have a little toot at that shall we.  "He lost his job" people cry.  He didn't - he left the PJ of his own accord after being taken off the Madeleine case.

"He lost his family!"  is the dramatic cry from some.  What has that to do with Kate and Gerry McCan

"He has lost his assets!".  The bloodmoney that he made cashing in on another family's misery has quite rightly been frozen.  Let's not forget that he has a lot of other debts.  Or is that the McCanns fault as well?
He is quite rightly being sued for a book that amongst other things claims that Madeleine's defrosting remains were carried in the Scenic.

 So all in all, I would say that Amaral has been the architect of his own misfortune.