Author Topic: Exploring the reason why Dr Amaral wanted to exclude the Press from libel case.  (Read 23144 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Exploring the reason why Dr Amaral wanted to exclude the Press from libel ca
« Reply #45 on: September 22, 2013, 09:44:41 PM »
Yes but only on your particular paws...which makes it subjective and irrational

oh...I think I'm getting too close to the truth and making people very angry... I post opinions and you post insults..

Offline gilet

Re: Exploring the reason why Dr Amaral wanted to exclude the Press from libel ca
« Reply #46 on: September 22, 2013, 09:45:51 PM »
here come the cries of abuse and dummy spitting, to be expected, grow a skin or two and grow up

Simply a question about the abuse you clearly directed at a fellow poster.
And a complete failure on your part to explain that clear abuse.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Exploring the reason why Dr Amaral wanted to exclude the Press from libel ca
« Reply #47 on: September 22, 2013, 09:47:30 PM »
Simply a question about the abuse you clearly directed at a fellow poster.
And a complete failure on your part to explain that clear abuse.
Zzzzzz


Enjoy your pseudo moralistic pathetic peurile campaign...which incidentally fails at every hurdle, always tara

Offline gilet

Re: Exploring the reason why Dr Amaral wanted to exclude the Press from libel ca
« Reply #48 on: September 22, 2013, 09:48:48 PM »
Zzzzzz


Enjoy your pseudo moralistic pathetic peurile campaign...which incidentally fails at every hurdle, always tara

And another failure on your part to explain why you abused a fellow poster. Its a terrible habit you seem to have.

Offline faithlilly

Do you not understand what "I have compassion and empathy for a struggling family" means?

And it was you who mentioned "the destruction of Amaral".  I simply countered that.

I see the words Rachel, I just don't believe they really mean anything.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Sherlock Holmes

As with Bennett, Kate and Gerry McCann just want him to STOP, Sherlock.  It's not just the book and the film, Amaral has been touring round giving interviews to all and sundry promoting his lies.  They just want him to stop.

I hope that he does stop, Rachel. Question is if litigation is the best way to achieve that.

In the mean time, a Pandora's Box of anti- McCann material opens...

icabodcrane

  • Guest
I hope that he does stop, Rachel. Question is if litigation is the best way to achieve that.

In the mean time, a Pandora's Box of anti- McCann material opens...

In what other ways could it be achieved  ?

Hiring private detectives to look into Amaral's professional and private life with the intention of  bringing about ruin in both  ?  ....  the use of intimidation and strong-arm legal tactics that would ensure financial crippling  ?  ...  hiring media experts to enable the smearing and denouncement of Amaral in the press  ? 

I think perhaps it is fair to assume that this court case is  the Last Chance Saloon

Offline carlymichelle


How do you imagine that the friends of the twins will tell them they could be kidnapped at any moment? Do you think that the friends parents' are about to inform their children about this case and what has been said in court. That would be a lovely way to start the day as the kids eat their cornflakes wouldn't it? "Oh by the way kids did I mention the threats to kidnap your little playmates at school?

8 year olds can read i could when i was  6 or   7

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
I hope that he does stop, Rachel. Question is if litigation is the best way to achieve that.

In the mean time, a Pandora's Box of anti- McCann material opens...

What else could do they apart from litigation?  Their names and reputations were being dragged through the mud and the book was damaging the search for Madeleine.  IMO they had no choice.  Amaral kept on and on and on.

ferryman

  • Guest
Are you kidding, Ferryman ? 25 years ! Up to 2 years or a fine of up to 240 days for concealment of body.

No, I'm not kidding at all.

Mark Harrison's reports make abundantly plain that he was asked to investigate the murder of Madeleine McCann.

And the penultimate sentence of his third and final report makes equally plain that, while Harrison formed no firm personal opinion (about what happened to Madeleine), he expresses the hedged and qualified view that if death has occurred, it is possible, Madeleine's remains have been disposed of into the sea.

stephen25000

  • Guest
What else could do they apart from litigation?  Their names and reputations were being dragged through the mud and the book was damaging the search for Madeleine.  IMO they had no choice.  Amaral kept on and on and on.

'..dragged through the mud..'

They did that all by themselves.

Offline carlymichelle

'..dragged through the mud..'

They did that all by themselves.

yep   not leaving the kids   would have prevented  whatever did happen to maddie pros dance around that issue  and then they cant understand the worldwide outrage

Benita

  • Guest
yep   not leaving the kids   would have prevented  whatever did happen to maddie pros dance around that issue  and then they cant understand the worldwide outrage


are you trying to say madeleine should be forgotten about and not looked for because her parents left her alone ????????

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
yep   not leaving the kids   would have prevented  whatever did happen to maddie pros dance around that issue  and then they cant understand the worldwide outrage

Can we have some examples of this "worldwide outrage", carlymichelle? 

Offline carlymichelle

Can we have some examples of this "worldwide outrage", carlymichelle?

are  you  pros that thick the outrage   of the mcanns being so neglectful  unlike  biased pros most people think what the mcanns  did was  selfish and cruel