Author Topic: Conversation with Ewen.  (Read 21071 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline puglove

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #15 on: May 17, 2012, 11:05:21 PM »
She tells EVERYONE (in pms) that she doesn't like Preece, and that she would like her banned. It's bollocks.

I see Frustrated of Brentwood has got another bee in her bonnet.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline puglove

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #16 on: May 17, 2012, 11:14:01 PM »
She tells EVERYONE (in pms) that she doesn't like Preece, and that she would like her banned. It's bollocks.

I see Frustrated of Brentwood has got another bee in her bonnet.

She's been a bit testy since Bamber dumped her, hasn't she?   @)(++(*

She goes on her luxury holiday soon! Wonder if susan ingham goes away the same weekend?
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Admin

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #17 on: May 18, 2012, 01:58:15 AM »
Did you ask Ewen about the story being put about by Mike Teskowski of how he was allowed to see a certain photo album in Ewen's office and while he still represented Jeremy?  Teskowski said that it was on the strength of what he told Jeremy about Ewen that got him sacked or is that a load of bollocks as well?

Offline ActualMat

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #18 on: May 18, 2012, 05:08:31 AM »
Did you ask Ewen about the story being put about by Mike Teskowski of how he was allowed to see a certain photo album in Ewen's office and while he still represented Jeremy?  Teskowski said that it was on the strength of what he told Jeremy about Ewen that got him sacked or is that a load of bollocks as well?

Yes.
This is why I was contacting him, to get to the bottom of this.

OnlyMe

  • Guest
Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #19 on: May 18, 2012, 08:24:52 AM »
Would I be correct in assuming that he disputes MT's version of events?

Offline John

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #20 on: May 18, 2012, 10:03:45 AM »
Would I be correct in assuming that he disputes MT's version of events?

I know who I would believe.  All we have heard from Tesko lately are the rantings of a fruitcake. 

Tesko is the author of his own demise with his wild theories, accusations and fantasy informants.  How anyone with an ounce of intelligence could ever believe him is beyond me.  @)(++(*
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline puglove

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #21 on: May 18, 2012, 01:05:05 PM »
Steady on, Neil the barrister.

Looks like Hartley's hit a nerve.   8@??)(
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline puglove

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #22 on: May 18, 2012, 02:32:54 PM »
Steady on, Neil the barrister.

Looks like Hartley's hit a nerve.   8@??)(

They are under strict instructions to pretend this forum doesn't exist, cut down on the silly facaebook-type gossip, keep as civil as poss, and DO NOT UPSET SIMON MCKAY. It is not a forum. It is a closed shop. And it makes Bamber look even more guilty!     8@??)(
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline puglove

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #23 on: May 18, 2012, 02:39:12 PM »
Hartley's on a warning.

Suprise surbleedingprise. He's just too good for them.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Only Me

  • Guest
Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #24 on: May 18, 2012, 02:59:17 PM »
Steady on, Neil the barrister.

Looks like Hartley's hit a nerve.   8@??)(

They are under strict instructions to pretend this forum doesn't exist, cut down on the silly facaebook-type gossip, keep as civil as poss, and DO NOT UPSET SIMON MCKAY. It is not a forum. It is a closed shop. And it makes Bamber look even more guilty!     8@??)(

Yes it does.  I was only there very briefly, but when I find myself wading through posts about stolen, missing pictures...pictures of hard drives...stories about meeting informants in Glasgow...slagging off moderators...accusing people of running sock accounts...I start to wonder where the focus is.

It's a shame:  I actually really did want to find out more about the case, and some of the posters over there seem like very nice, intelligent people regardless of their opinion on Bamber's guilt or innocence.  Unfortunately, the voices of reason seem to be drowned out by the silliness.

The very sad fact is, after a couple of weeks on a forum proclaiming his innocence, I've come away feeling that he's more than likely guilty because I find it very hard to take anything that I read on there as factual information.  If some of the information is based on fantasy, then I have to take the rest of it with a grain of salt too, I'm afraid.

Anyway, it's all a bit of a moot point I suppose.   

Offline puglove

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #25 on: May 18, 2012, 03:00:01 PM »
Hartley's on a warning.

Suprise surbleedingprise. He's just too good for them.

Nelly's lost it, like Belton did. They're both quite old, and neither really believe that Bamber is innocent. It must be quite a strain.   8(8-))
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline puglove

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #26 on: May 18, 2012, 03:09:09 PM »
Hartley's on a warning.

Suprise surbleedingprise. He's just too good for them.

It's a silly forum, just tit for tat squabbling. It would be more interesting watching 2 tramps trying to push each other off a bench.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline ActualMat

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #27 on: May 18, 2012, 05:04:33 PM »
Would I be correct in assuming that he disputes MT's version of events?

That's an understatement.

Only Me

  • Guest
Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #28 on: May 18, 2012, 05:27:30 PM »
Well, i can't say that comes as a surprise.  I assume the photo doesn't exist?

Offline John

Re: Conversation with Ewen.
« Reply #29 on: May 18, 2012, 05:33:43 PM »
To be fair there was a time when the material being discussed had a certain amount of honesty about it but I fear the longer this has gone on the accusations and theories have just got completely out of hand.  I have followed many cases over the years and I usually find it quite easy in the end to establish who is being completely honest and who is trying to pull the wool over.

I know for a fact that Jeremy Bamber is furious at the way his old mucker Tesko has been carrying on recently.  His situation is so precarious however that he dare not upset Tesko for obvious reasons...just look what happen when he sent a few warning words in Miss Preece's direction.

I also know that Jeremy doesn't know the half of the rubbish that is being promoted on TT and he would be enraged if he ever heard that Tesko was promoting the idea that Nevill fathered the twins.  It's not that he gives a dam about Nev's reputation but it brings the case and his arguments into disrepute.

All in all, a sad mess.   8(0(*
« Last Edit: May 18, 2012, 05:35:43 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.