Were the half hour visual checks a convenient invention after the fact?

[Brietta]

Sorry but i must have missed it
What was your factual info that proves that the recording of paper articles on two and more sites was deliberately corrupt? Lets hear it

• I have provided you with a link to the original newspaper article
• I have provided links which prove that the newspaper in question publishes notification of alteration or amendment to publications as a matter of course

I think that makes matters very clear.  Whether or not you wish to take that information on board is entirely a matter for you however do not presume to misrepresent what I have posted.

I am really rather puzzled why you appear to attach so much belief in what is posted on unregulated internet blogs as opposed to the original newspaper report.

[mercury]

• I have provided you with a link to the original newspaper article
• I have provided links which prove that the newspaper in question publishes notification of alteration or amendment to publications as a matter of course

I think that makes matters very clear.  Whether or not you wish to take that information on board is entirely a matter for you however do not presume to misrepresent what I have posted.

I am really rather puzzled why you appear to attach so much belief in what is posted on unregulated internet blogs as opposed to the original newspaper report.

Thats a negative on your two bullet points

Newspaper articles are amended all the gime, and for years after their original publications, so where you got the idea that they announce all alterations is beynd me

Mcf press log and pamalams press log are press logs
Neither are blogs either
I suggest you open your mind, reread my previous posts and accept a callous piece of journalism was removed because of what it was, nothing else