What do you guys think of this?

[johnmartins]

Hello I just signed up here because I read an article about Maddie and found it very interesting. There is a lot of good information about the case and I wanted to find out other peoples opinions on it.

This is the article:
http://enragedcitizen.com/the-truth-about-madeleine-mccann/

There are two parts, make sure you read both before commenting. Let me know what you think..

[Mr Gray]

Hello I just signed up here because I read an article about Maddie and found it very interesting. There is a lot of good information about the case and I wanted to find out other peoples opinions on it.

This is the article:
http://enragedcitizen.com/the-truth-about-madeleine-mccann/

There are two parts, make sure you read both before commenting. Let me know what you think..

When I got to the part where is says PDL has little or no crime I stopped reading...obviously full of lies...it goes on to say that abduction is the opinion of major news outlets failing to mention its the current theory of both UK and PJ police

[Carana]

Welcome.

I had a skim read. Some of it appears reasonably accurate, but it's intermingled with a number of myths, half-truths and (arguably) details taken out of context.

[Mr Gray]

Welcome.

I had a skim read. Some of it appears reasonably accurate, but it's intermingled with a number of myths, half-truths and (arguably) details taken out of context.

don't be coy...there are several lies in there

[Mr Gray]

Hello I just signed up here because I read an article about Maddie and found it very interesting. There is a lot of good information about the case and I wanted to find out other peoples opinions on it.

This is the article:
http://enragedcitizen.com/the-truth-about-madeleine-mccann/

There are two parts, make sure you read both before commenting. Let me know what you think..

I'm sure you are not as uninformed as you make out...all these point are well known and have been discussed at length on this forum

[ferryman]

I stopped at the part about the 'Smith family account'.

Mr Smith is very clear in his original statement that the only one who shared his thoughts that the man might be Gerry was his wife.

All his children disagreed with him, including Aofe, arguably the most astute and assured observer of what the Smiths all saw that night.

And later, Martin Smith himself recanted of the view that the man might have been Gerry and agreed to produce an e-fit (after initially refusing to produce an e-fit, as you might expect all the time he thought the man might have been Gerry).

[Mr Gray]

I stopped at the part about the 'Smith family account'.

Mr Smith is very clear in his original statement that the only one who shared his thoughts that the man might be Gerry was his wife.

All his children disagreed with him, including Aofe, arguably the most astute and assured observer of what the Smiths all saw that night.

And later, Martin Smith himself recanted of the view that the man might have been Gerry and agreed to produce an e-fit (after initially refusing to produce an e-fit, as you might expect all the time he thought the man might have been Gerry).

so smith changed his mind whereas this article claims smith has never changed his mind

[stephen25000]

Hello I just signed up here because I read an article about Maddie and found it very interesting. There is a lot of good information about the case and I wanted to find out other peoples opinions on it.

This is the article:
http://enragedcitizen.com/the-truth-about-madeleine-mccann/

There are two parts, make sure you read both before commenting. Let me know what you think..

An interesting account, and not one the mccanns will like, with their made up abduction story.

[ferryman]

so smith changed his mind whereas this article claims smith has never changed his mind

Smith says in his report to the Irish Gardia police that he was approached by Brian Kennedy representing the McCanns to produce an efit, but refused.

I would need to check, but I think that was the New Year 2008.

At some point between then and the crimewatch programme, he relented and agreed to produce the efit.

[pathfinder73]

The Smithman sighting time at 9:50 is incorrect. It had to be 10 or later. There is only one way this crime happened. There is only one way that connects everything - moving doors, open window, Smithman sighting. The timeline was brought forward to 10 on purpose because of the Smithman sighting - he worked alone and was not part of a burglar gang - nobody went through the window. The new correct timeline is going to change everything and show everyone how the crime happened and reveal the identity of Smithman who looks very similar to that suppressed efit. They need further evidence to put it to bed.

[sadie]

The Smithman sighting time at 9:50 is incorrect. It had to be 10 or later. There is only one way this crime happened. There is only one way that connects everything - moving doors, open window, Smithman sighting. The timeline was brought forward to 10 on purpose because of the Smithman sighting - he worked alone and was not part of a burglar gang - nobody went through the window. The new correct timeline is going to change everything and show everyone how the crime happened and reveal the identity of Smithman who looks very similar to that suppressed efit. They need further evidence to put it to bed.

Were you there?

One of the watchers? 

[sadie]

So they need further evidence, then.  I assume that you are a member of the PJ or Operation Grange to be making such bold statements on this forum?

Nah, he was there .... one of the watchers .... weren't you pathfinder.

Eunice, you are new on here, welcome.

You should know that Pathfinder KNOWS everything about this case .... he doesn't need evidence or proof.  If he says it, then it is fact

Innit pathfinder ?

[pathfinder73]

Nah, he was there .... one of the watchers .... weren't you pathfinder.

Eunice, you are new on here, welcome.

You should know that Pathfinder KNOWS everything about this case .... he doesn't need evidence or proof.  If he says it, then it is fact

Innit pathfinder ?

Let's see how good SY are because they should arrive at the same conclusion. There's only one way that connects and Smithman is their prime suspect and the timeline alarm raised will be 9:55 NOT 10.

[pathfinder73]

I see.  So you are trained police officer then are you?  Are you a member of the PJ or the Met?

Nope just an ordinary guy.

[Brietta]

Nope just an ordinary guy.

As an “ordinary guy” you may be entitled to sit on a jury where you will have to listen to and evaluate the evidence being presented before deciding someone’s fate.  That worries me.