Author Topic: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine  (Read 328391 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #255 on: September 09, 2014, 06:45:22 PM »
I'm looking forward to reading the comments on Amazon contradicting the book and blaming the parents. Should be a few about short sleeved pyjamas being an obvious sign of guilt.

Kate 'did not tell the truth' about the child's arm's/sleeves.


McCann Oprah 4th May 2009

Gerry : "Jane went to check on her children and it was at that point she was just passed us going up to the corner and she saw a man carrying a young girl with almo.. she described independently the pyjamas that Madeleine had on.."

Kate: "The child was barefoot and bare armed..."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=xNI5up44Nho#t=820

Jane Tanner didn't see the child's arms.



Kate say's Smithman's child had nothing on her arms.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=fRQQWmpiO3s#t=293


Smithman's child was witnessed to have had long sleeves on, as shown in the Crimewatch reconstruction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=OZ8jmdWlB8Y#t=1431


There was no reason for her to do that.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2014, 05:00:25 PM by John »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Montclair

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #256 on: September 09, 2014, 06:56:43 PM »
From the excerpts I have read so far it seems to me that Summers and Swan's book is nothing more than a rehash of newspaper articles over the last 7 years. His main investigative tool must have been Google search.

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #257 on: September 09, 2014, 06:57:39 PM »
From the excerpts I have read so far it seems to me that Summers and Swan's book is nothing more than a rehash of newspaper articles over the last 7 years. His main investigative tool must have been Google search.

...and Kate's book.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Brietta

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #258 on: September 09, 2014, 07:05:10 PM »

Sorry Brietta I have only scanned the book but going by the number of pages in the index referring to Jane Tanner  and the sighting I would say there is as much coverage if not more than the Smith sighting but I would have to read the book in its entirety before being really able to make a judgement .

Thank you Erngath ... I am just being impatient, of course you must have time to digest and think about the content before saying anything ... enjoy your read, I think I will be burning the midnight oil on Thursday, I've cleared the decks in anticipation.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Erngath

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #259 on: September 09, 2014, 07:07:23 PM »
Idle curiosity on my part.

To satisfy your idle curiosity...................." of visits they received from a charity collector-or collectors-for a charity that apparently did not exist"
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #260 on: September 09, 2014, 07:09:31 PM »

Still clinging to Bundleman then, even going so far as talking to yourself about it, there's a surprise.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline faithlilly

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #261 on: September 09, 2014, 09:00:19 PM »
To satisfy your idle curiosity...................." of visits they received from a charity collector-or collectors-for a charity that apparently did not exist"

Apparently ? In his extensive research why didn't Mr Summers interview the people who gave statements, find out what the orphanage was called and investigate properly if it existed ? Isn't that what an investigative journalist does, follows the clues ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #262 on: September 09, 2014, 09:02:25 PM »
Apparently ? In his extensive research why didn't Mr Summers interview the people who gave statements, find out what the orphanage was called and investigate properly if it existed ? Isn't that what an investigative journalist does, follows the clues ?

Are you interested in the book...I'M not...do you really think there is anymore information out there?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #263 on: September 10, 2014, 10:13:37 AM »
Baltimore Sun
The Nixon sensationalism: A failure of accountability
A highly credentialed authority takes Anthony Summers and Viking to task for compromising professionalism.
September 10, 2000
By STEVE WEINBERG | SPECIAL TO THE BALTIMORE SUN

The latest sensationalism about Richard Nixon demonstrates what's best and what's worst about big-time New York book publishing. Authors and publishers should -- must -- be held accountable for published works. There's a simple standard: Just say no to sensationalism and the hype that emphasizes the sensational over the substantive. The book in this case is "The Arrogance of Power: The Secret World of Richard Nixon"(640 pages, $29.95). The author is Irish investigative reporter Anthony Summers. The big New York City publisher is Viking, an imprint of Penguin Putnam Inc.

First, how does the book represent what's best about big-time publishing? As with Summers' massive earlier books about J. Edgar Hoover, Marilyn Monroe and the John F. Kennedy assassination, "The Arrogance of Power" demonstrates that the author spends long hours over many years traveling paper trails and people trails as he seeks to understand his subject. For all their flaws, Summers' books have value. Hooray for the publishers like Viking that pay authors enough in advance so that kind of research is possible to conduct. In many ways, "The Arrogance of Power" is the best one-volume, full-life biography of Nixon ever published. The storyline hangs together well, the writing is capable, the explanation for doing yet another Nixon book (Summers' bibliography lists 51 previous biographies, plus dozens more about his presidential years) is acceptable.

So, how is the book representative of what's worst in New York publishing -- the sensationalisitic parts, and the hyping of them? To casual readers, the sensationalism might not always stand out. Summers (assisted by his journalist-wife Robbyn Swan as well as hired researchers) gives even the most precarious evidence the patina of credibility through copious endnotes. "The Arrogance of Power" contains 116 pages of endnotes, set in type so tiny that the page count really ought to be much higher. How many readers will spend much (if any) time matching the information in the text to the sourcing in the endnotes? Not many.

But looking at the book's sourcing, especially the sourcing for some of its "gotcha" moments, is revelatory. One of Summers' freshest, most sensational allegations is that during their 53-year marriage, Richard Nixon beat his wife, Pat, at least once, maybe more often.Viking called attention to the allegation in the press release accompanying the book's publication on Aug. 28. The release says "On the night of his electoral defeat in 1962 ... Nixon's wife Pat required medical treatment following an assault by her husband." And the book is already teasing readers to the information by page xiv of the preface, where Summers writes of "touching testimonials" at Richard Nixon's funeral to the long marriage, then adds, "Other memories told a sadder story -- of prolonged marital difficulty, of physical abuse, of threatened divorce."

It's legitimate for a biographer to examine his subject's marital relations. But when the evidence is shaky, the findings ought to remain unpublished, or at least unhyped. The detailed allegations of wife beating appear on pages 232-237. Summers writes there how research "suggests that Nixon physically attacked his wife after his loss in 1962." In the text itself and the endnotes, here are the sources mentioned for the supposedly compelling scenario:

* A statement by Nixon rival Gov. Pat Brown "years later" that "[w]e got word at one stage of the campaign that he kicked the hell out of her, beat her." The endnotes show that the Brown statement came from the papers of long-ago Nixon biographer Fawn Brodie. How many readers will notice that? If they do notice, how many will know that among many professional biographers like myself, Brodie, while sometimes considered spottily brilliant, is frequently dismissed as an unreliable researcher and writer?
* An echo of Brown's statement by his aide Frank Cullen. Did Cullen have independent knowledge? Or did he merely listen to the hearsay from his boss? It is hard to know, based on Summers' rendition.
* A comment by journalist Bill Van Petten "years later" that sometime just before or just after Nixon's bitter public speech in defeat he "beat Pat badly ... so badly that she could not go out the next day." The phrasing suggests Van Petten might have been a witness, but a few sentences later, Summers writes: "Van Petten is dead, and his account as related here comes from a friend to whom he spoke in the early eighties." The endnote about Van Petten's information is confusing rather than enlightening. Despite several readings, I have no idea what it means

After providing the Van Petten information, Summers writes, "the first credible corroboration of the 1962 beating allegation was provided by John Sears, a former Nixon aide who went on to political distinction." The use of the word "credible" raises an alarming question: If Sears is the first source Summers finds credible, why is he including Brown, Cullen and Van Petten as sources (indirect as they may be)? Sears, Summers says in the text, received his information long after 1962 from Waller Taylor, the Nixon family's lawyer, and from Pat Hillings, identified as Nixon's "long-time friend and associate." Furthermore, "As Sears understood it from Taylor, the 1962 beating was not an isolated incident. Spousal abuse, indeed, is almost always repetitive." Maybe Taylor and Hillings had firsthand knowledge, maybe secondhand knowledge, maybe even less reliable information. There is no way to know from Summers' book.

In 1993, I spent weeks reading Summers' biography "Official and Confidential: The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover," comparing and contrasting Summers' biography with three previous biographies of Hoover researched by scholars and journalists. Putnam is the publisher. My research resulted in a review of the books for the Washington City Paper that appeared in the March 26, 1993, issue. Despite being last in the publishing line, Summers presented some useful new information and new interpretations of older information.

But, as with "The Arrogance of Power," Summers is guilty of arrogance of hype. The most sensational passages purported to show that he-man, G-man Hoover was a homosexual and a cross-dresser. If true, that information carried significance, especially if it opened up Hoover to blackmail by members of organized crime families and other unsavory elements. So, I wondered, had all the previous biographers missed the evidence? Or found the so-called evidence and discarded it? I can admit this: I wanted to accept Summers' evidence because of my visceral dislike for Hoover and my admiration for first-rate investigative reporting, even when the subject matter is salacious. But after checking Summers' documentation as carefully as an outside reviewer without subpoena power can, I found myself disbelieving many passages in Summers' book about Hoover's sexual orientation. That Summers would include damning information based on such weak evidence made me wonder what Summers and his publisher would do for an encore. Now I know.

As for Summers, I distrust the most sensationalistic revelations. As for Viking, I worry whether the drive toward best seller status has compromised standards of truth.

Steve Weinberg is a biographer in Columbia, Mo. From 1983-1990, he served as executive director of Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), an international organization based at the University of Missouri Journalism School. Among his six published books is "The Reporter's Handbook: An Investigator's Guide to Documents and Techniques," written for IRE and published by St. Martin's Press. He is working on a revised edition. http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2000-0 ... -summers/2
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #264 on: September 10, 2014, 11:41:38 AM »
Get Ready to Swoon  8)--))

Madeleine McCann: 'I listened for 15 seconds and knew they were innocent’
By Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan7:05AM BST 10 Sep 2014

A wealthy British businessman was moved to help search for Madeleine McCann after her parents Kate and Gerry became suspects

Gerry and Kate McCann never ceased doing what they could to move forward the investigation – which they saw as stalled – into Madeleine’s disappearance. They held, always, to the belief that their daughter could still be alive.
When they returned to the UK from Portugal in September 2007, Gerry insisted it did not mean they were giving up their search for her. ''As parents we cannot give up on our daughter until we know what has happened.”
Three days later, someone who was to be of great and lasting assistance to them got in touch. Brian Kennedy, a wealthy British businessman, had been following events as they unwound in Portugal and wanted to help.
“I was incredulous,” he told us. “I’d been losing all hope and faith in human nature. I had been asking myself, 'How is this possible?’ [Kate] is grieving. My instincts were telling me there was a great injustice being done. I called my lawyer and said, 'I want you to reach out to these poor folks and see if we can help them’.”
Kennedy, the Scottish-born, Cheshire-based son of a window cleaner, then aged 47, had leapfrogged from trainee accountant to a management role in a kitchen-equipment company, then to the mobile-phone business, double-glazing and plastics. By 2007 his net worth as head of his company, Latium Enterprises, was said to be £250 million.

An experiment with retirement had driven him “nuts” and he was back in the business fray. When he began talking about trying to help the McCanns, friends and colleagues told him not to get involved, that his intervention would end in tears. “What,” he recalled someone saying, “if the parents turn out to be guilty?”
“I remember replying, 'What happens if they’re innocent?’ Can you imagine the horror of losing your daughter… and then the world turning against you and accusing you of being responsible for her murder? Is it not bad enough, the terror, the agony they are going through? I could understand it – I’ve got five kids. I told my lawyer, 'If you feel they’re innocent, then we’ll get behind them and help them’.”

His lawyer made contact with the McCanns and they met Kennedy in London. “Within 15 seconds of listening to Kate,” he said, “I made a decision, using all the emotional intelligence one builds up over many years. I was 100 per cent convinced of their total innocence. I told them that, one, we would find a top Portuguese lawyer to defend them, and get them off as arguidos [the McCanns had been designated “named suspects” by the Portuguese authorities days before they returned to England]. Two, we’d do everything in our power to influence the public’s perspective and views. And, three, we’d support them in setting up some private investigators … The Portuguese police had stopped investigating. It was urgent to get some other guys on to it.”
Top-level legal help was found in Portugal. At Kennedy’s bidding and at his expense, Clarence Mitchell – a government adviser who had previously acted as the McCanns’ spokesman in Praia da Luz, the holiday resort from where Madeleine had disappeared – quit his Whitehall job and came back on-board.
Kennedy prefers not to reveal how much he spent on helping the McCanns, beyond saying that there were “substantial” outgoings – principally legal and media-related costs. Stephen Winyard, the owner of Stobo Castle Spa, in Peebleshire, and Sir Richard Branson also contributed. However, it was Madeleine’s Fund – the not-for-profit company established to find her in 2007, the board of which Kennedy’s then lawyer joined – that would, in time, deal with the cost of private investigators, once that effort went into high gear.

Present at Kennedy’s first meeting with the McCanns in London were representatives of Control Risks, a firm specialising in security and crisis management. It had already sent detectives to Portugal to see the couple right after Madeleine’s disappearance, at the expense of an anonymous donor whose identity has never been revealed.
Kate McCann had not enjoyed that first encounter. One of the Control Risk operatives was a mysterious figure who introduced himself only as “Hugh”. He was one of the many former intelligence officers the company employed, and a main part of his role now was as a potential kidnap negotiator. Kate, already distraught, had not liked the James Bond atmosphere he brought with him. Besides, there would never be anybody other than hoaxers with whom to negotiate.
As the McCanns’ renewed use of Control Risks began to be mentioned in the press, noises of disapproval came from Portugal. “You cannot have private detectives intervening in criminal cases,” sniffed Carlos Anjos, head of the Polícia Judiciária’s union. The McCanns resolved to go ahead, motivated by advice Gerry had noted during a research trip to the US earlier that summer.
A document issued by the US Justice Department for use by parents of missing children, The Family Survival Guide, recommended considering using private detectives if they could “do something better or different than what is being done by law enforcement”. Given what they saw as the fiasco of the Portuguese police probe, the McCanns nurtured that hope.
“I had no experience at all with private detectives,” Kennedy remembered. “But the way you run a business is all about surrounding yourself with people who understand industries that you don’t understand.” He initially hired two former Metropolitan Police detectives, and in late September decided to follow up a rumour that Madeleine might have been sighted in Morocco. Kennedy and the detectives, who flew out aboard his private jet, hired a Moroccan tourist guide to accompany them to the mountain village where it was reported the missing girl might be. She was not there, but the guide – promised a reward – subsequently spoke of having travelled vast distances circulating Madeleine’s picture. “If I find her,” he said, “I will be rich. I have been promised I will never have to work again – maybe a million pounds.”
“I suppose,” Kennedy said later “we had been looking for low-hanging fruit. After a few weeks, though, we decided we needed to go about it in a very professional way.”
Brian Kennedy had set a potentially useful process in motion. Months earlier, the Portuguese police had produced a poor drawing of the man the McCanns’ friend, Jane Tanner, had seen carrying a child near the holiday apartment in which the McCanns had been staying on the night Madeleine vanished. Now, in England, a British forensic sketch artist took on the job of extracting more and relevant information from Tanner. This fresh image got major media coverage – raising the possibility of new leads.
Kennedy then cast around for suitable private investigators to hire, and picked Método 3, a Spanish company. The agency’s claims included having located 23 missing children and teenagers. Given that it was not legitimate for investigators to work for the McCanns in Portugal while the police probe was still under way, it was hoped that Método 3 – with its knowledge of the region and its connections in Spain – might prove effective.
It seemed, briefly, that the private detectives could also rebuild bridges with the Portuguese Polícia Judiciária. At the request of the head of Spain’s anti-kidnapping unit, two PJ officers met Método 3 operatives. But the points the private detectives raised did not interest the Portuguese.
Método 3 followed up on a vast number of potential openings in the hunt for Madeleine. Nothing tangible resulted, but they made some startling statements that kept the case in the public eye. “We are 100 per cent sure,” their boss, Francisco Marco, told the American network CBS, “that she is alive. We know the kidnapper. We know who he is and how he has done it.” On the BBC’s Panorama programme, he said: “We are very close to finding the kidnappers.” Then, in early December, he announced: “We believe she is in an area not very far from the Iberian peninsula and North Africa. And we have a fairly certain idea who she is with.”
No facts emerged, however, to back up these claims. According to The Daily Telegraph, a source close to the McCanns said the couple had begun to think “they might have been sold a pup”. A veteran Spanish police detective was derisive. Método 3 would solve the case, he said, “cuando las ranas crecen los pelos” – “when frogs grow hair”.
As the months slipped by, the McCanns made a move they were to regret. A contract was agreed with Oakley International, a US-based company described by a source close to the couple as being apparently “absolutely the best, but extremely secretive”. Oakley was said to employ former FBI, CIA and US Special Forces personnel. It was reportedly agreed that Madeleine’s Fund would pay the company £500,000 under a three-stage contract – with more to come should Madeleine be found alive.
The McCanns and Kennedy at first got the impression that Oakley was doing its job. Its investigators appeared to be collating and following up information that came in as a response to the parents’ appeals, and were conducting covert interviews in Portugal.
But it later emerged that hundreds of calls to a dedicated hotline were never checked by Oakley. Tapes of interviews conducted in Portugal were said to be useless, involving people irrelevant to the case. Specialists used by Oakley began to find that their bills went unpaid. An undertaking to deliver satellite images of Praia da Luz on the night of May 3, 2007, when Madeleine had disappeared, resulted only in pictures grabbed from Google Earth. With little or no real progress, and as funds continued to haemorrhage, Brian Kennedy called time.
Oakley’s boss Kevin Halligen, it turned out, was a fraud. After his involvement in the Madeleine case, Halligen was arrested in the UK in connection with charges relating to a trading company fraud, and extradited to the United States. He was convicted there on the fraud matter, then deported to Europe.
“The Oakley episode went sort of sweet and sour,” Kennedy told us. “There were genuine guys breaking their back, trying to make a breakthrough. The lion’s share was spent on the investigation, despite what the newspapers say… [But] it all ended in tears.”
It was a major setback, but Kennedy and the McCanns did not give up. On the recommendation of the head of Manchester’s Serious Crime Squad, they went on to hire an experienced former senior police officer, David Edgar. He put in much arduous, systematic work – and held the fort until 2011, when, following an appeal to David Cameron, Scotland Yard began investigating. The dossier the McCanns’ private detectives had gathered was passed to the Yard, and its probe continues today – as Operation Grange.

'Looking For Madeleine’ by Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan (Headline, £18.99) is available from Telegraph Books for £16.99 + £1.95 p&p (0844 871 1514 or visit books.telegraph.co.uk)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/11077525/Madeleine-McCann-I-listened-for-15-seconds-and-knew-they-were-innocent.html
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Brietta

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #265 on: September 10, 2014, 12:20:00 PM »
Are you interested in the book...I'M not...do you really think there is anymore information out there?

If there is anymore information out there it will be in the hands of the Met and the PJ.  We have been told this will be a long haul and if the situation with the letters of request (to which I think the Portuguese have actually acted as timeously as the system allows, illustrating why a Joint Investigation would be more efficient) and the present turmoil in the Portuguese Justice system are anything to go by, will prove to be correct.

I think the release of a book by respected authors, which must consist of facts already well rehearsed in forums like ours, will be of use to keep the general public informed and allow the pressure to continue for a resolution to exactly what happened to Madeleine McCann as these are the people who are footing the bill and who should be aware of the nuances of her case.



"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #266 on: September 10, 2014, 01:07:46 PM »
Are you interested in the book...I'M not...do you really think there is anymore information out there?

You appear to have changed your mind good-sir since the "looks like a good read" of July 26th
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Brietta

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #267 on: September 10, 2014, 01:21:07 PM »
You appear to have changed your mind good-sir since the "looks like a good read" of July 26th

That is what is known as expressing an opinion ... because one thinks it may be "a good read" it doesn't follow that one is actually interested in reading it.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #268 on: September 10, 2014, 01:43:58 PM »
That is what is known as expressing an opinion ... because one thinks it may be "a good read" it doesn't follow that one is actually interested in reading it.

Pedantically very true but that will limit the reliability of any future comment don't you think
For my part I intend to read it despite the criticism of earlier works, all of which criticism it seems may be distilled down to this comment about "Not In Your Lifetime".
Summers is an honest researcher who unfortunately is too easily bamboozled by suspect witnesses with "interesting" stories to tell". snip>>>>
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/books.htm

"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Erngath

Re: Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine
« Reply #269 on: September 10, 2014, 02:02:31 PM »
Apparently ? In his extensive research why didn't Mr Summers interview the people who gave statements, find out what the orphanage was called and investigate properly if it existed ? Isn't that what an investigative journalist does, follows the clues ?


Chapter 5. Page 59

The authors visited both small communities, and contacted local people who knew the area well. They and the head of a foundation that raises funds for orphanages, have said that no such "orphanage" existed."
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.