Just had a look at the book in waterstones. It is highly critical of amaral, pat brown, Bennett..stevo etc. It is extremely supportive of the mccanns . It points out where amaral misinterprets the evidence. I don't see how anyone can ignore such an established journalist...he really puts the doubters in their place.
These two are nothing more than two writers giving their opinions.
Thy will not solve the case.
We already know Amaral misinterpreted the forensics,old news They were inconclusive.
Didn't you read what Eleanor said davel, we are not supposed to mention Bennett, or is that subject to which side of the fence you abide in ?
As to Pat Brown, why is she of less regard than this pair, who after all are only making money from Madeleine ?
have they asked why the mccanns and associates changed their stories, updating them to the circumstances.
Do they explain the dogs reactions ?
Do they explain why dogs were used in Portugal recently in the investigation ?
Do they explain why after 7 plus years, no trace of Madeleine has been found ?
Do they analyze quantitatively all other possible scenarios as to Madeleine's disappearance ?
or didn't they do that, because it might involve libel ? %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#
Clearly, a thorough and professional investigation would do that, and that yet again hasn't happened.
In the end , it's just two more amateurs giving their one sided view of the case, and as before has come no closer to solving it.
