Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine

[Anna]

The thing here is though....you said in your earlier post ...its a story of how it happened .....and we don't know how it happened ...do we ...

we can only go from one story but there is  another ....your grandaughter is only seeing one side ...that IMO is not fair...G.A. book is also wrote from files yet no one in the UK can buy it as freely...even though it is not banned.

She has in fact read most of the Amaral book on line and has since decided that it doesn't read true. Anyone can read this.
The book as Topic, tells what and where, without casting accusations on anyone, that I can see.
Just plain explanations of what has happened to date.
What really happened to Madeleine is another thing altogether and unfortunately nobody truly knows what happened to the child.
We are all just throwing around possibilities and trying to eliminate from our minds, the least likely of theories.

[xtina]

She has in fact read most of the Amaral book on line and has since decided that it doesn't read true. Anyone can read this.
The book as Topic, tells what and where, without casting accusations on anyone, that I can see.
Just plain explanations of what has happened to date.
What really happened to Madeleine is another thing altogether and unfortunately nobody truly knows what happened to the child.
We are all just throwing around possibilities and trying to eliminate from our minds, the least likely of theories.

Ah right.....i know the G.A...book can be read on line but not like you mentioned ..like laid in bed at your leisure ....or if you have no access to being on line .....but as you said ...no one really knows what happened...and its wrong the only permitted info at this moment in time is the abduction theory...

but never mind...... i can but hope one day the full truth will be known

[John]

Having not read the majority of the posts on this thread yet, can anyone offer a verdict on this new book?

Is it a load of regurgitated bollocks or full of useful new facts and evidence which will be useful to the police?

[Anna]

Ah right.....i know the G.A...book can be read on line but not like you mentioned ..like laid in bed at your leisure ....or if you have no access to being on line .....but as you said ...no one really knows what happened...and its wrong the only permitted info at this moment in time is the abduction theory...

but never mind...... i can but hope one day the full truth will be known

I was talking about this new book, that she read in bed.
 I am in bed now, with a 19" laptop.
I have no idea whether she read a part of Amarals book in bed (as she has one of these small tablet type computers) or whether she had a quick look when the kids were abed. I do not know how she read it and it should be of no consequence to you either.

[Eleanor]

I am in bed on a 13 inch lap top.

[xtina]

I was talking about this new book, that she read in bed.
 I am in bed now, with a 19" laptop.
I have no idea whether she read a part of Amarals book in bed (as she has one of these small tablet type computers) or whether she had a quick look when the kids were abed. I do not know how she read it and it should be of no consequence to you either.

it is no consequence to me ....but i think you may have the wrong end of the stick....it was the BOOK of
G.A..... that you cannot read in bed or werever......... and that not all have laptops computers or anymeans of reading the book in the UK ....and to me that is wrong ...

because again like you say we don't know what happened ...it should not all be onesided what we read...or should i say allowed to read.

[xtina]

Having not read the majority of the posts on this thread yet, can anyone offer a verdict on this new book?

Is it a load of regurgitated bollocks or full of useful new facts and evidence which will be useful to the police?

well according to the review on the link below ...

http://my-mccann-thoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/looking-for-madeleine-chapter-by.html

it is inaccurate .[seven chapters so far]..and looking through the chapters i cant see what the point of writting it was

[Brietta]

it is no consequence to me ....but i think you may have the wrong end of the stick....it was the BOOK of
G.A..... that you cannot read in bed or werever......... and that not all have laptops computers or anymeans of reading the book in the UK ....and to me that is wrong ...

because again like you say we don't know what happened ...it should not all be onesided what we read...or should i say allowed to read.

The Summers & Swann book libels no-one; unfortunately Dr Amaral and his publishers are accused of libelling Madeleine McCann's parents and damaging the search for her, we await the judgement of a Portuguese court on that.

Whatever the Portuguese court decides ... and at this rate we will all be dead and gone before that happens ... I doubt that any British publisher would risk publishing unless the book was rewritten to exclude material which would definitely fail the test of a British court and thus generate massive damages.

For example Dr Amaral's interpretation of 'the dog's evidence' would have to go and be replaced by a factual account ... and that is only one of the numerous changes which would have to be effected to make it legal.

   

[Alfred R Jones]

Having not read the majority of the posts on this thread yet, can anyone offer a verdict on this new book?

Is it a load of regurgitated bollocks or full of useful new facts and evidence which will be useful to the police?

It is neither.  It is a level-headed examination of the known facts, presented in an unhysterical, unpartisan way.  It doesn't satisfy those with an insatiable desire for new McCann trivia, gossip and speculation, but tough tits (well if you can be vulgar, so can I!)

[stephen25000]

It is neither.  It is a level-headed examination of the known facts, presented in an unhysterical, unpartisan way.  It doesn't satisfy those with an insatiable desire for new McCann trivia, gossip and speculation, but tough tits (well if you can be vulgar, so can I!)

' It is a level-headed examination of the known facts, presented in an unhysterical, unpartisan way.'

 &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

Since when is one sided, level headed ??

[Brietta]

well according to the review on the link below ...

http://my-mccann-thoughts.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/looking-for-madeleine-chapter-by.html

it is inaccurate .[seven chapters so far]..and looking through the chapters i cant see what the point of writting it was

Perhaps you should place less reliance on reviews from bloggers and buy the book which would enable you to make up your own mind.

Why change the habit of a lifetime though ... people being told what to think by bloggers has been the hallmark of Madeleine's case since 2007.

[Brietta]

' It is a level-headed examination of the known facts, presented in an unhysterical, unpartisan way.'

 &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

Since when is one sided, level headed ??

Have you read it?

If not ... what qualifies you to declare it one sided?

[Eleanor]

' It is a level-headed examination of the known facts, presented in an unhysterical, unpartisan way.'

 &%&£(+ &%&£(+ &%&£(+

Since when is one sided, level headed ??

Why do you think it is one sided?  Is it because they don't accuse The McCanns?

Is Amaral's book one sided, do you think?

[stephen25000]

Have you read it?

If not ... what qualifies you to declare it one sided?

I'm afraid  brietta , you're not important enough for me to answer the question.

Deja vu, eh ?

[stephen25000]

Why do you think it is one sided?  Is it because they don't accuse The McCanns?

Is Amaral's book one sided, do you think?

What is your opinion  of Amaral's book  ?

Forget that, I already know the answer. 

and let's not forget the Mills and Boon book, not helped with by JK. %£&)**# &%&£(+ %£&)**# &%&£(+