Summers & Swan - A new book - Looking For Madeleine

[Mr Gray]

From the Daily Mail :

"Mr Summers is quoted as saying: 'Our source told us that after stumbling across 18 burglaries last year, they have now discovered a total of 28 in the area of Praia da Luz in the years around 2007 when Madeleine disappeared.
'It gives them a much better chance of matching evidence against forensics from the McCann apartment.
'I was told there was great sensitivity around this forensic testing, nobody wants to discuss it, but they are making progress and believe the case is solvable.'




'Their source' ? So is  OG leaking like a sieve  or is Mr Summers making it up and if the former will we see the same castigation of OG from the faithful as we saw towards the PJ when they were thought to be leaking information to the press ?

perhaps its a Portuguese leak

[sadie]

So, YOU, Faith are attributing the leak to SY without any proof or even indicators?  No history of that with SY..


Let us remember the history of the PJ when Amaral led them.  They leaked like a seive.


Why dont you stop guessing and always keep blaming the British?

[Miss Taken Identity]

Madeleine McCann’s parents had an age progressed image of her made in America to show how she might look as an older child ~ to maximize publicity ~ it was first aired on the Oprah Winfrey show.

lol Yeah, they just had to go to America and appear on a show in a country that had no bearing on their missing child, did the take the smithmans pics as well? They did not need to go to America, I bet they had an agent who arranged this 'globe trotting'.

 They showed Jammies same as Maddie was wearing saying Jane saw them as maddie was being abducted....Oh.  dear...oopsie

[Alfred R Jones]

lol Yeah, they just had to go to America and appear on a show in a country that had no bearing on their missing child, did the take the smithmans pics as well? They did not need to go to America, I bet they had an agent who arranged this 'globe trotting'.

 They showed Jammies same as Maddie was wearing saying Jane saw them as maddie was being abducted....Oh.  dear...oopsie

Whilst not gloating per se, would you agree that you never miss an opportunity to stick the boot in re: the McCanns?  Your tiresome cynicism re: the couple in question rather detracts from every argument you attempt.

[Brietta]

lol Yeah, they just had to go to America and appear on a show in a country that had no bearing on their missing child, did the take the smithmans pics as well? They did not need to go to America, I bet they had an agent who arranged this 'globe trotting'.

 They showed Jammies same as Maddie was wearing saying Jane saw them as maddie was being abducted....Oh.  dear...oopsie

Allegedly Mr Amaral would have welcomed the opportunity to to grace Oprah's sofa ... wonder why she ignored him?
Perhaps her researchers thought anything he might say would be worse than useless in finding Madeleine McCann; I think she has a proven track record in empathising with those who are in distress and needing help, so maybe she could see the bigger picture.

 
**snip
“The Oprah show is seen by millions in the US and worldwide and they hope that these age progressed pictures will lead to the crucial sighting, which will bring their daughter home.

“There are a number of messages they want to get out there. It was felt, Oprah provided an appropriate platform.”

According to Portuguese newspaper, 24horas, former PJ inspector, Gonçalo Amaral has also contacted the Oprah show and requested he be allowed to give viewers his account of what happened to Madeleine McCann after she disappeared from Praia da Luz on May 3, 2007.

Gonçalo Amaral told 24Horas that he is doubtful anyone from the show will reply to him, but if he was invited, he would fly to the US at his own expense to take part in the show.

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic10102.html

[Miss Taken Identity]

Whilst not gloating per se, would you agree that you never miss an opportunity to stick the boot in re: the McCanns?  Your tiresome cynicism re: the couple in question rather detracts from every argument you attempt.

No. Not at all. I merely reply to posters in here when they try to pin a halo on heads which gives the Seriousness of  Maddies demise a fairytale feel to it.

What I type is accurate. I am not getting at the parents, I have said many times they may have made a  mistake, but I do challenge the make believe surrounding this case.

[Eleanor]

Summers and Swan.  Off Topic Posts will be removed.

[faithlilly]

One question that springs to mind following Summer's recent hawking of his wares

Is it really in the interest of the investigation for Summers to be publicising confidential information allegedly from that investigation in order to simply to sell a few more copies of his book ?

[OxfordBloo]

One question that springs to mind following Summer's recent hawking of his wares

Is it really in the interest of the investigation for Summers to be publicising confidential information allegedly from that investigation in order to simply to sell a few more copies of his book ?

No. But as he is not an officer of the court, be is free to under the laws on Free Expression which I hope we all respect- a free press being important.

[faithlilly]

No. But as he is not an officer of the court, be is free to under the laws on Free Expression which I hope we all respect- a free press being important.

It may be legal but it is moral ?

[OxfordBloo]

It may be legal but it is moral ?

Are you suggesting that Free Speech could be immoral?

[Alfred R Jones]

It may be legal but it is moral ?

What's your opinion on the morality of Amaral's book?

[Alfred R Jones]

Are you suggesting that Free Speech could be immoral?

Of course free speech can be immoral - anyone who's ever read a word of #McCann on twitter can see that!

[OxfordBloo]

Of course free speech can be immoral - anyone who's ever read a word of #McCann on twitter can see that!

It can be immoral to specific people, but what is allowed in a society was be moral as its acceptance indicates what a society is willing to tolerate.

Individuals or groups may disagree.

[Eleanor]

Topic, Please.  You are wandering again.