New documentary:"BURIED BY MAINSTREAM MEDIA -The True Story of Madeleine McCann.

[Jean-Pierre]

Sorry Benice, it is in the last episode at time stamp 50.26

"As Robert Murat walked past the unmarked police van Jane Tanner became adamant to the police that he was the very man she had seen walking near the McCanns apartment ten days ago"

NB He avoided claiming that he was carrying a child.

I have removed my last post as I was in error.

Jane Tanner's statement rather differs from that:

4078    “I know this seems like an obvious question, which I think I know the answer to, because I’ve seen the artist’s impression, did you see the man’s face?”

Reply    “No, no, not, no, I mean, just the hair, well not, not that I could remember to give details, give details to”.

4078    “Now you are left with that mental image in your head about the man carrying the child”.

Reply    “Umm”.

4078    “And you said, you described his hair quite well.  Having seen MURAT then and obviously in the papers since, could you link the two of those?”

Reply    “I don’t think so.  I mean, I don’t, phew, I don’t, I don’t think it, no, there doesn’t, there’s no, but then the person I see in the paper doesn’t really look like my recollection of the person I met on the way to meet Bob SMALL.  It’s really annoying because normally I would have probably taken more notice but I was so worried about what I was going to do, because I didn’t know at this point at all, I didn’t really take any notice, but I think it was too short and I remember it being, being long into the neck and not so.  Again, I don’t really, when I saw Robert MURAT outside his house he looked quite little to me, but then when you see him on the telly he seems quite bit, so I can’t, again, I don’t think the build, the build was right, I don’t”.

4078    “So you don’t feel, in your heart of hearts”.

Reply    “No”.
4078    “You don’t feel it was the same person?”

Reply    “No, I don’t, no”.
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id222.html

_______________

[Benice]

Sorry Benice, it is in the last episode at time stamp 50.26

"As Robert Murat walked past the unmarked police van Jane Tanner became adamant to the police that he was the very man she had seen walking near the McCanns apartment ten days ago"

NB He avoided claiming that he was carrying a child.

I have removed my last post as I was in error.

Thanks Angelo.  No probs.

[stephen25000]

Now to part 4.

[stephen25000]

I managed to review the documentary whilst traveling yesterday and I suggest that anyone who is familiar with the facts in the case cut to the chase and watch part 4 first as it contains some real dynamite.

Dynamite is the word for this fourth part.

Half way through it.

[ferryman]

Have you watched part 4 ferryman ???

My speakers have packed up, Stephen.

I've not watched any of it.

[stephen25000]

My speakers have packed up, Stephen.

I've not watched any of it.

Try a pair of headphones on the audio out socket.

[Alfred R Jones]

I managed to review the documentary whilst traveling yesterday and I suggest that anyone who is familiar with the facts in the case cut to the chase and watch part 4 first as it contains some real dynamite.

Such as?

[stephen25000]

Well part 4 is very informative to say the least.

[Brietta]

I managed to review the documentary whilst traveling yesterday and I suggest that anyone who is familiar with the facts in the case cut to the chase and watch part 4 first as it contains some real dynamite.

Sorry John ... no way am I sitting through that rubbish ... I gritted my teeth and managed to get as far as Clarence Mitchell's job being to control the press.  That and the John Stalker pronouncement are such tired old forum myths which have been exposed as such ad nauseam that it is highly likely the rest of his ouvre is just more of the same ill researched trash.

From the little I have seen these tapes are unadulterated balderdash and lend nothing of substance which could possibly help in any way to resolve what happened to Madeleine; and actually I think that may be the least of his condiderations.

[stephen25000]

Have you watched part 4 of the video ?

and can you tell me which parts are incorrect ?

P.S. I've done some research on some of the companies mentioned, and of course  checked some of Mitchell's quotes. So far, it seems he is quite accurate in his findings.

[Mr Gray]

Have you watched part 4 of the video ?

and can you tell me which parts are incorrect ?

P.S. I've done some research on some of the companies mentioned, and of course  checked some of Mitchell's quotes. So far, it seems he is quite accurate in his findings.

It's called the true story...how can he make this claim when no one knows what happenned

[stephen25000]

It's called the true story...how can he make this claim when no one knows what happenned

He doesn't claim to know what happened to Madeleine.

You haven't watched the video,have you ?

[Mr Gray]

He doesn't claim to know what happened to Madeleine.

You haven't watched the video,have you ?

why should I want to...the little I looked at was rubbish........

[stephen25000]

why should I want to...the little I looked at was rubbish........

That comment merely demonstrates he is correct.l

[stephen25000]

I thought it was important to watch them.  But that's just me.  However, I do think it would all have fitted into an hour.  In which case I would have been prepared to watch it again.  But there is no way I am ploughing through that lot again.

But I might watch Part Four again as I agree that it did raise some interest.

I have yet to watch part 3, but I will do so and also watch part 4 again as well.
You can use 'Company Check', a partially free service to check on some details. The crook Halligen is listed several times and with a current 'address'.