Well Stephen et al. I have watched the 4th part again. Good grief.
The only reason I can see for your apparently being so convinced by this chap is you are happy to believe anything which suggest the McCanns may be guilty, no matter how feebly researched.
A few examples of the authors tenuous contact with reality have already been mentioned above.
I will therefore only add a couple of points
- Alpha Investigations Group. He does not seem to be aware that an organisation can exist without being incorporated. Jesus he is as longwinded as he is ill informed.
- There was a long section concerning a letter from an "unnamed diplomat" leaked to a Belgian newspaper, suggesting that the government should be cautious about supporting the McCanns. (around 28 minutes) Apparently this only appeared in this rather obscure Belgian Newspaper. We vare told that this "explosive" and "damning" report has never been mentioned in the british press.
Now, given that the british press went through a period of being blantanly anti McCann, this is puzzling. Just the sort of thing that would sell newspapers, especially after September 2007.
The newspaper in question was Le Dernier Heure. Who apparently had a an exclusive. Why this particular newspaper, and why Belgium? Well, there is a possible connection. One of the journalists who has been very active in this case is one Duarte Levy, a Belgian freelance journalist - erstwhile squeeze of Joana Morais, a close friend of Amaral. One of the papers he freelanced for was "le Dernier Heure". Too close for comfort.
My conclusion is that this chap seems to have used the Bennett research agency.
And from his previous "work" he is of the school "if you dont accept my conclusions, based on selective reading and my very biased and poorly researched investigation, then you are in denial.
I have watched all four of his videos. Not worth even the price he is charging for them.