Author Topic: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.  (Read 405734 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1035 on: February 28, 2015, 06:06:02 PM »
I am not pre-judging anything, I think you'll find.

Well let's see the coroner's verdict. 8)-)))

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1036 on: February 28, 2015, 06:14:56 PM »
Well let's see the coroner's verdict. 8)-)))

It's suicide

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1037 on: February 28, 2015, 06:17:06 PM »
« Last Edit: February 28, 2015, 06:20:41 PM by Wonderfulspam »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1038 on: February 28, 2015, 06:17:20 PM »
I've only just seen this article - it's primarily concerned with Ched Evans but comments on the baying online mob, and highlights the case of BL - some interesting points raised I thought:

Quote
The tipping point for horrid little @sweepyface came on Saturday, October 4, when she killed herself. The mob was noisily at work that day, too, although not so much when news of her death leaked out. The mob isn’t big on personal responsibility. Not their own, anyway.


Leyland was a 63-year-old divorced mother living in the Leicestershire village of Burton Overy

She was a university graduate and churchgoer, with a well-hidden and rather nasty alter ego, existing behind an alias on social media, where she obsessively posted spiteful and unfounded allegations about Gerry and Kate McCann.

Sky News identified Leyland, although not by name, in a story about internet trolls. Its reporter, Martin Brunt, confronted her in the street and said her tweets were now being studied by the Crown Prosecution Service. Sweepyface was suddenly the subject of widespread online vitriol. Taking her own medicine badly, she fled her home and hid at the Marriott hotel in Leicester. Three days later she committed suicide.

You’d think the mob would have been made happy by this turn of events — after all, some of them had as good as wished for it — but no.

It turned on Brunt instead, demanding his resignation and calling for Sky News to be prosecuted.

A new round of blame shaming began. And what if Brunt had become depressed at this development and taken his life, too? Would a new mob have turned on that old mob, hounding its most vocal members to death, social media’s own strange circle of natural selection?

Survival of the mouthiest.

Leyland wasn’t a troll, anyway. That’s the irony. She was a nutter. An old-fashioned, green ink, one-note conspiracy theorist, fixated on the case of Madeleine McCann.

She rarely posted on any other topic and could spend three hours or more in any one sitting, debating, questioning, flooding the internet with her obsession.

Trolls aren’t committed like that. Trolls drop little spite-filled bombs on all manner of topics, seeking reaction. Katie Hopkins is a troll: a failed reality show contestant of weak intellect with an unhealthy influence on public debate.

In any other age, she would be nobody; now she is courted by television companies and print media, too obsessed with faux-controversy to care about the content. She waded in on the Evans controversy on Tuesday with a statement too facile for words.



Some of what Leyland said about the McCanns was truly vile. Yet in death she became a sympathetic, almost pitiful, figure. She was bad, it was decided, but the mob was worse. And that is where we may end up with Evans eventually, unless our better nature prevails.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2899404/MARTIN-SAMUEL-Ched-Evans-victim-mobs-going.html#ixzz3T44rDztG
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1039 on: February 28, 2015, 06:21:25 PM »
It's suicide

Can you comprehend the words, WAIT FOR CORONER ?

 8)-)))

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1040 on: February 28, 2015, 06:37:21 PM »
Can you comprehend the words, WAIT FOR CORONER ?

 8)-)))

I can comprehend the words but don't take any notice of the likes of you....the evidence is overwhelming...it's suicide

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1041 on: February 28, 2015, 06:42:05 PM »
Whilst on most "sceptic" fora they are busy jumping to conclusions that Brenda was murdered on the orders of you-know-who <<<insert roll eyes smiley

Knights Templar;Freemasons;The Government (of any country);Illuminati; Inquisition (Spanish or Portuguese);The Klan; The CIA; The Cubans; Mossad;
Delete as applicable according to your theory.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1042 on: February 28, 2015, 06:47:00 PM »
Knights Templar;Freemasons;The Government (of any country);Illuminati; Inquisition (Spanish or Portuguese);The Klan; The CIA; The Cubans; Mossad;
Delete as applicable according to your theory.
Nope, none of them.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1043 on: February 28, 2015, 06:48:33 PM »
I can comprehend the words but don't take any notice of the likes of you....the evidence is overwhelming...it's suicide

Really.

Your words have no consequence at all.

As to the 'abduction'.

Not a jot of evidence to support it.

Unless you believe Nitrous Oxide is Helium of course. 8)-)))

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1044 on: February 28, 2015, 06:51:19 PM »
I can comprehend the words but don't take any notice of the likes of you....the evidence is overwhelming...it's suicide

I believe in justice & the rule of law, Brenda remains innocent of her own demise until proven otherwise in a court of law.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1045 on: February 28, 2015, 06:56:22 PM »
Nope, none of them.

Pretty much everything is blamed on them so I am running out of ideas except for:
The Romans; The Normans; Oliver Cromwell; William of Orange; N.U.M; after that I give up.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1046 on: February 28, 2015, 06:59:20 PM »
I believe in justice & the rule of law, Brenda remains innocent of her own demise until proven otherwise in a court of law.

Or decreed by a pundit on here  *&*%£ *&*%£
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1047 on: February 28, 2015, 07:01:34 PM »
Really.

Your words have no consequence at all.

As to the 'abduction'.

Not a jot of evidence to support it.

Unless you believe Nitrous Oxide is Helium of course. 8)-)))

neither do yours Stephen...but of course there is evidence to support abduction

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1048 on: February 28, 2015, 07:06:13 PM »
neither do yours Stephen...but of course there is evidence to support abduction

Only if you inhabit the Twilight Zone.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #1049 on: February 28, 2015, 07:08:29 PM »
Really.

Your words have no consequence at all.

As to the 'abduction'.

Not a jot of evidence to support it.

Unless you believe Nitrous Oxide is Helium of course. 8)-)))

nitrous oxide and helium....there is a massive difference between the two gases when it comes to asphyxiation...do you know what it is