Journalist Sonia Poulton promises "The untold story of Madeleine McCann".

[Alice Purjorick]

Sonia Poulton doesn't seem to be concerned too much with the effects of trolling given her intention to 'unmask' the person who presented the dossier to the authorities.  What does she think the unfaithful will do with that information?

I think it is worth remembering; the person who handed in the dossier was reporting criminal activities and providing evidence to back up the complaint.

One can only ever speak for oneself but were it I the name Felicity Arkwright comes to mind.
But then there may be those who choose look upon it in the light of "Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest".
Then of course (a barrel of ifs coming up here). If who ever handed over the dossier is known and if the coroner believes it relevant to make that person's name known in her report then poor old Sonia Poulton will have been beaten to the draw. Then if that happens will the faithful believe that the coroner has been unreasonable in publishing the persons name?
Plenty to go out there folks.
Grab a line 

[Mr Gray]

One can only ever speak for oneself but were it I the name Felicity Arkwright comes to mind.
But then there may be those who choose look upon it in the light of "Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest".
Then of course (a barrel of ifs coming up here). If who ever handed over the dossier is known and if the coroner believes it relevant to make that person's name known in her report then poor old Sonia Poulton will have been beaten to the draw. Then if that happens will the faithful believe that the coroner has been unreasonable in publishing the persons name?
Plenty to go out there folks.
Grab a line 

I would say outside these forums there is zero interest in the dossier and zero interest in the author of the dossier...what importance is there in knowing who the author is....

[Alice Purjorick]

I would say outside these forums there is zero interest in the dossier and zero interest in the author of the dossier...what importance is there in knowing who the author is....

You are probably right. On a scale of 1 to 10 in importance it is not off the bump stop.
None to me. But then I am not slagging off Sonia Poulton like it's going out of fashion (or making out she is the second coming of The Messiah just to keep a balance).
It may be relevant to the coroner; who knows?

[Anna]

Please, try and stay on the Topic of this thread. Thank you.

[Brietta]

One can only ever speak for oneself but were it I the name Felicity Arkwright comes to mind.
But then there may be those who choose look upon it in the light of "Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest".
Then of course (a barrel of ifs coming up here). If who ever handed over the dossier is known and if the coroner believes it relevant to make that person's name known in her report then poor old Sonia Poulton will have been beaten to the draw. Then if that happens will the faithful believe that the coroner has been unreasonable in publishing the persons name?
Plenty to go out there folks.
Grab a line 

I think the unfaithful are going to be even more disappointed when the inquest reconvenes and the coroner delivers a verdict than they have been already.
I doubt there will be any mention of the dossier let alone the name of the person who complained about the criminal activities recorded within.

[stephen25000]

I think the unfaithful are going to be even more disappointed when the inquest reconvenes and the coroner delivers a verdict than they have been already.
I doubt there will be any mention of the dossier let alone the name of the person who complained about the criminal activities recorded within.

Ah, here we go again, the 'unfaithful'.

I hate to disappoint you, but the vast majority of people don't worship the McCann's.

I suggest you look up in an 'urban dictionary', 'doing a McCann'.

[Brietta]

Ah, here we go again, the 'unfaithful'.

I hate to disappoint you, but the vast majority of people don't worship the McCann's.

I suggest you look up in an 'urban dictionary', 'doing a McCann'.

New Year Resolution for you ... stop derailing threads by going off topic ... it is very puerile and tiresome.

This thread concerns Sonia Poulton and her forthcoming revelations in her documentary outlining her outrage that criminal activities have been reported to the police.

I think the evident hypocrisy of the venture is apparent to all, particularly the unfaithful.  As for me, I can hardly wait.

[Alice Purjorick]

I think the unfaithful are going to be even more disappointed when the inquest reconvenes and the coroner delivers a verdict than they have been already.
I doubt there will be any mention of the dossier let alone the name of the person who complained about the criminal activities recorded within.

Well I did say "a barrel of ifs coming up".
Perhaps you did not read that otherwise you would not have found it necessary to have made this post.
Happy New year and all that 

[Brietta]

Well I did say "a barrel of ifs coming up".
Perhaps you did not read that otherwise you would not have found it necessary to have made this post.
Happy New year and all that 

Oh, I read it.  I hung on to every word.

[Carana]

You are probably right. On a scale of 1 to 10 in importance it is not off the bump stop.
None to me. But then I am not slagging off Sonia Poulton like it's going out of fashion (or making out she is the second coming of The Messiah just to keep a balance).
It may be relevant to the coroner; who knows?

What's "it"?

[Mr Gray]

You are probably right. On a scale of 1 to 10 in importance it is not off the bump stop.
None to me. But then I am not slagging off Sonia Poulton like it's going out of fashion (or making out she is the second coming of The Messiah just to keep a balance).
It may be relevant to the coroner; who knows?

Highlighting poulton's jounalistic credentials is not slagging her off...it's being realistic...something that is in very short supply around here.

[stephen25000]

Highlighting poulton's jounalistic credentials is not slagging her off...it's being realistic...something that is in very short supply around here.

So you are saying they are on a par with the McCann's parenting skills then ?

[Lyall]

Because big, bad Sonia's coming to get her presumably.  It seems veiled threats against this woman (whoever she is) are quite acceptable amongst the "sceptics".  Lilke I said before, this video is all about retribution for Brenda.

You miss one inconvenient truth: somehow this 'dossier' also got sent to Sky News, and they and their allies decided they wouldn't wait for police and legislation. Isn't that retribution?

[stephen25000]

I would compare poultons journalistic skills with your ability to make a sensible post

My posts merely highlight the illogic of those like you supporting the McCann's, and that's what you hate.

As to the video/film, all we'll see is attacks from those who haven't seen it and continued personal attacks on Poulton.

[Brietta]

You miss one inconvenient truth: somehow this 'dossier' also got sent to Sky News, and they and their allies decided they wouldn't wait for police and legislation. Isn't that retribution?

Is it your suggestion Sky News should have hidden information they had been given by a genuinely concerned member of the public, without investigation? Smacks of censorship.

Brenda Leyland had instigated communication with Martin Brunt. 
He was following that through; we still have no idea what he was told at their arranged private interview later on that day.

However, I think it is about time there was a reality check among the unbelievers.

Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · Oct 31
I believe Madeleine #McCann case will be 1st one solved with aid of social media detectives. Let's face it, the police aren't going to do it
 
 ... and with attitudes such as that ... I really can't wait to see exactly what is in this documentary, particularly if the discredited profiler from across the pond has been consulted for it.