Journalist Sonia Poulton promises "The untold story of Madeleine McCann".

[carlymichelle]

I would be very interested to see any documentary by this journalist. Not  sure why people are complaining scoffing and prejudging. This should be left for after.  I have seen her briefly on a couple of shows and she seems lucid, well spoken, intellgent, logical and interesting. But, of course, I imagine, she has "questions" - a total anathema for so many of course. Silly me.

Bizarre.

its very cultlike isnt it.....

[mercury]

its very cultlike isnt it.....

There are cultish elements in many supporters' not sure what to call it, "position"? Nothing said can make them think outside the box. IE There is always an "innocent explanation" for everything. Hang on, Ive heard that somewhere before, I do believe it was from their spokesman, Clarence Mitchell. Now, for starters, he wasn't there, so how he can with all honesty state that, without telling us why, is a bit of a mystery.

I know for a fact that many people who doubt the Mccanns, rightly or wrongly, are a bit more open minded.

And of course there are in betweeners.

The combination of the Mccanns actions in so many respects and the shelving of the case and despite the reopened enquiry has lead us where we are today, which, frankly,is no further than 2007

Also it didn't help the Mccanns when they wouldn't answer interview questions straightforwardly over the years, which as an innocent couple they had no reason not to, their desire to control everything from the very start went against them

[Mr Gray]

I would be very interested to see any documentary by this journalist. Not  sure why people are complaining scoffing and prejudging. This should be left for after.  I have seen her briefly on a couple of shows and she seems lucid, well spoken, intellgent, logical and interesting. But, of course, I imagine, she has "questions" - a total anathema for so many of course. Silly me.

Bizarre.

I'm scoffing because I doubted her credibility when she first announced the video and now it looks as though it will never be made...so I was right again

[jassi]

Its just another of these things that doesn't really matter at all, but seem to excite some people.
If the documentary appears, it appears. If it doesn't, it doesn't. I'm sure we can all wait and see.

[Mr Gray]

Damning new Madeleine documentary promised for 2015

A damning new “evidence-based” documentary is being prepared for screening in 2015 and promises to tell the “Untold Story of Madeleine McCann” - alleging that “no abduction took place at all”.

what is interesting is the way the gullible on here believed that this documentary would happen

[G-Unit]

There are cultish elements in many supporters' not sure what to call it, "position"? Nothing said can make them think outside the box. IE There is always an "innocent explanation" for everything. Hang on, Ive heard that somewhere before, I do believe it was from their spokesman, Clarence Mitchell. Now, for starters, he wasn't there, so how he can with all honesty state that, without telling us why, is a bit of a mystery.

I know for a fact that many people who doubt the Mccanns, rightly or wrongly, are a bit more open minded.

And of course there are in betweeners.

The combination of the Mccanns actions in so many respects and the shelving of the case and despite the reopened enquiry has lead us where we are today, which, frankly,is no further than 2007

Also it didn't help the Mccanns when they wouldn't answer interview questions straightforwardly over the years, which as an innocent couple they had no reason not to, their desire to control everything from the very start went against them

Good post! Clarence Mitchell said (20th Sept 2007 to Sky);

 "It appears to us that they were looking at one particular set of circumstances and, as I’ve said a number of times already, any evidence they may or may not have found which gave them cause for suspicion of Gerry and Kate can be wholly and easily explained should it come to that. Please bear in mind Gerry and Kate have not been accused of anything."
http://madeleinemythsexposed.pbworks.com/w/page/39078192/Rebuttal%20of%20%22Fact%22%2041

He's saying that any evidence leading to suspicions of the McCanns can be wholly and easily explained. No explanations have ever been offered however.

[Carana]

Any news on a) what this is about and b) when it's going to be broadcast  and c) on which station?

[Benice]

Good post! Clarence Mitchell said (20th Sept 2007 to Sky);

 "It appears to us that they were looking at one particular set of circumstances and, as I’ve said a number of times already, any evidence they may or may not have found which gave them cause for suspicion of Gerry and Kate can be wholly and easily explained should it come to that. Please bear in mind Gerry and Kate have not been accused of anything."
http://madeleinemythsexposed.pbworks.com/w/page/39078192/Rebuttal%20of%20%22Fact%22%2041

He's saying that any evidence leading to suspicions of the McCanns can be wholly and easily explained. No explanations have ever been offered however.

I think he was referring to the people who matter - such as SY for instance  - and not to a small group of people on the internet who seem to think they have a right to be informed of every move the McCanns make and are somehow entitled to be given 'explanations'.   
 

[Carana]

Why on earth does any member of the public feel entitled to every detail of an ongoing criminal investigation case?

Do you agree that intelligence of potential terrorist attacks should be made accessible for all to comment upon? If so, would you feel the same if a potential threat against your loved ones in a holiday resort was carried out because online speculation involved a "now or never" situation?

If not, why not. If so, why.

[ferryman]

There are cultish elements in many supporters' not sure what to call it, "position"? Nothing said can make them think outside the box. IE There is always an "innocent explanation" for everything. Hang on, Ive heard that somewhere before, I do believe it was from their spokesman, Clarence Mitchell. Now, for starters, he wasn't there, so how he can with all honesty state that, without telling us why, is a bit of a mystery.

I know for a fact that many people who doubt the Mccanns, rightly or wrongly, are a bit more open minded.

And of course there are in betweeners.

The combination of the Mccanns actions in so many respects and the shelving of the case and despite the reopened enquiry has lead us where we are today, which, frankly,is no further than 2007

Also it didn't help the Mccanns when they wouldn't answer interview questions straightforwardly over the years, which as an innocent couple they had no reason not to, their desire to control everything from the very start went against them

 Hang on, Ive heard that somewhere before, I do believe it was from their spokesman, Clarence Mitchell. Now, for starters, he wasn't there, so how he can with all honesty state that, without telling us why, is a bit of a mystery.

Those who insist theMcCannsdunit weren't there, either. 

Yet they seem supremely confident of their certainty to insist what they do.

Most odd ...

[stephen25000]

Hang on, Ive heard that somewhere before, I do believe it was from their spokesman, Clarence Mitchell. Now, for starters, he wasn't there, so how he can with all honesty state that, without telling us why, is a bit of a mystery.

Those who insist theMcCannsdunit weren't there, either. 

Yet they seem supremely confident of their certainty to insist what they do.

Most odd ...

Neither were you, but you insist you know what happened.

Most odd....

[Mr Gray]

Neither were you, but you insist you know what happened.

Most odd....

but you insist it was a accident..and you weren't there

[stephen25000]

but you insist it was a accident..and you weren't there

and you insist it was an abduction, without any evidence at all.

Nice.

[Mr Gray]

and you insist it was an abduction, without any evidence at all.

Nice.

I have never insisted it was an abduction...you cannot get anything right

[stephen25000]

I have never insisted it was an abduction...you cannot get anything right

Yet you promote it at every opportunity.

Without one iota of evidence.

Keep it up.