Its blame Sheila time again!

[Angelo222]

If police picked up a gun from the window, as Mike insists, and walked around with it, before placing it on Sheila (I'm sorry, why was that, again?) wouldn't they at least make sure that there wasn't a bullet left in it? Wouldn't the gun be made safe before someone started waving it about, and messing with Sheila's finger on the trigger?

Shona, please don't take the noxious dribble being posted by Tesko as anything which could ever be taken seriously.

There is no mystery about the rifle.  It was checked shortly after the police firearms unit entered the room and both the rifle and the magazine were found to be empty.  There was no smell which would evidenced that a firearm had recently been discharged.  The rifle would have been laid to the side to facilitate inspection and photography of the body.

Tesko's rants are those of a psychotic lunatic.

[puglove]

Thank heavens for Bridget. Can Tesko and Roachford really be that blind?     >@@(*&)

[John]

Thank heavens for Bridget. Can Tesko and Roachford really be that blind?     >@@(*&)

There's none so blind as those who will not see.    And in the case of Tesko and Roch that couldn't be more true!
      

[puglove]

Thank heavens for Bridget. Can Tesko and Roachford really be that blind?     >@@(*&)

I don't know how she puts up with being patronised by those 2 idiots. Anyone with half an eye can see that the gun hasn't moved in any way, it's just angles and shadows. 

[Dillon]

If police picked up a gun from the window, as Mike insists, and walked around with it, before placing it on Sheila (I'm sorry, why was that, again?) wouldn't they at least make sure that there wasn't a bullet left in it? Wouldn't the gun be made safe before someone started waving it about, and messing with Sheila's finger on the trigger?

Shona, please don't take the noxious dribble being posted by Tesko as anything which could ever be taken seriously.

There is no mystery about the rifle.  It was checked shortly after the police firearms unit entered the room and both the rifle and the magazine were found to be empty.  There was no smell which would evidenced that a firearm had recently been discharged.  The rifle would have been laid to the side to facilitate inspection and photography of the body.

Tesko's rants are those of a psychotic lunatic.

It really is a no brainer ! I don't know why we have to continue debating the obvious in this case other then to counteract the bilge propagated by a small group of individuals who seem to be obsessed with the notion of Bamber's innocence. I just wish that they could try and consider the evidence objectively and realise how ridiculous it is to consider that Sheila Caffell was responsible. It is all very well for posters on Tesko's forum to describe this forum as poisonous etc but with a little bit of insight they should appreciate that desecrating the memory of an innocent victim of a killer is pretty nasty . I cannot understand their motives . If there is mud slinging, then the blue forum people are being incredibly hypocritical . Some of their posters chuck the insults around as much as people here who at times react to their illogical and bizarre theorising. A case of the pot calling the kettle black !   

[puglove]

One day, a really brave Bamber member will say that JUNE was responsible for the murders (remember, Mike?) and Ralph fathered the twins (remember, Mike?) and Sheila ran about the house barking like a dog...you get it. Mike, you've pushed it too far. And the Maddy thing (please come and get me, Mr. Mike) is hurtful and offensive. You've lost the plot. You know who killed Sheila (and the family) and you haven't got a clue about Maddy. You look a bit of a tit.


IMO.

[Mr Justice K]

Trying to read the propaganda in the Bamber case on twitter is like trying to thread a needle with a pair of rubber gloves on.  The blame Sheila campaign is well and truly underway as this is the only option now available to them.  How awful it must be for Sheila's real parents, I just hope they are never unfortunate enough to read any of it.

[Joanne]

Is there any information about Sheila's birth parents?

[John]

Sheila might have had her problems but she was a wonderful mother to her sons.  Show me any mother who claims to have never had some problems or misgivings about rearing their offspring and I will show you a liar.  Child rearing is the most difficult but the most rewarding job in the world.

Jeremy Bamber took all that away from Sheila and Colin.  He stole their whole lives away from them. 

[John]

Is there any information about Sheila's birth parents?

Sheila Jean Caffell (1957 - 1985) was born to Christine Jay, the daughter of a chaplain of the Archbishop of Canterbury.  She later married and is now known as Mrs Christine Sykora and lives in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Out of respect for Sheila the letters will not be posted.



Statement by DI Paul Brown after meeting Mrs Sykora.

[John]

Statement by Sheila's uncle.

[simon]

Isn't it strange how both Julie Mugford and Christine Jay ended up in Canada.  Do you think they knew each other?

[Tim Invictus]

Oh blame Sheila time again is it? Groundhog day again at Tesco Towers!

At least they have an eco conscience. I have never seen so much pointless recycling!

[Dillon]

Oh blame Sheila time again is it? Groundhog day again at Tesco Towers!

At least they have an eco conscience. I have never seen so much pointless recycling!

Surprise, surprise !! The Bamber supporters know perfectly well that the only real defence case that they can present is to blame Sheila so here they go again churning out the same repetitive ill informed garbage. Silly sad individuals like " Lookout " reel out ad nauseum their prejudiced fiction about the family being dysfunctional and a distorted perception of Sheila's health problems . Of course we know that it is extraordinarily unlikely that Sheila was responsible. It is not a complicated case.  Innocent Sheila = Guilty Jeremy. End of story. It really is not rocket science . Just a shame that some people's lives are so lacking in meaning that they have to waste endless lonely hours tapping away at their computers.
 

[John]

Oh blame Sheila time again is it? Groundhog day again at Tesco Towers!

At least they have an eco conscience. I have never seen so much pointless recycling!

Surprise, surprise !! The Bamber supporters know perfectly well that the only real defence case that they can present is to blame Sheila so here they go again churning out the same repetitive ill informed garbage. Silly sad individuals like " Lookout " reel out ad nauseum their prejudiced fiction about the family being dysfunctional and a distorted perception of Sheila's health problems . Of course we know that it is extraordinarily unlikely that Sheila was responsible. It is not a complicated case.  Innocent Sheila = Guilty Jeremy. End of story. It really is not rocket science . Just a shame that some people's lives are so lacking in meaning that they have to waste endless lonely hours tapping away at their computers.

There's that name again?  There would appear to be a concerted effort by unnamed individuals on the blue forum to try and discredit Sheila and lay the blame at what happened at her door.  I have seen the same nonsense being promoted on twitter by other faceless individuals.  Had Sheila been in such a disturbed state of mind she could very well have used the rifle, it isn't rocket science after all.  What she couldn't have done though was to achieve total annihilation in the way it occurred. Only someone with acute cunning and expert knowledge of that particular weapon could have done that.  The lack of prints, the absence of blood spatter on Sheila and the absence of the slightest forensic evidence on her body or clothing which could put her anywhere near the actual killings is testament to her innocence.