Eddie and Keela and what the alerts meant if anything.

[Mr Gray]

As I see it there are far too many mods who are partisan to make any moderation fair.

That doesn't just apply to sceptics

[faithlilly]

That doesn't just apply to sceptics

As there are more mods who support the parents, or at the very least are not convinced of their guilt than there are mods who believe they may be involved.

[Brietta]

Firstly where have I told you or anyone what to post or what not to post?  Its up to posters which posts they choose to respond to. 

I think a lot comes down to a poster's objectives ie you claim some continually promote the alerts as evidence and you feel the need to want to respond by definition continually.  What do you hope to achieve by this?  It's extremely unlikely you will convert those who you claim continually promote the alerts as evidence to your way of thinking.  How does going round in circles assist with MM's disappearance?  Do you think lawyers and forensic scientists believe there's any evidence against the McCanns?  The fact that some posters on a forum or some other place think otherwise so what?   

I think the indicative word in your post is "respond".

Davel is not making the allegations many of which are of a pejorative nature ... he is responding.  So why single him out for criticism?

[Mr Gray]

As there are more mods who support the parents, or at the very least are not convinced of their guilt than there are mods who believe they may be involved.

Mods who support the parents don't always, support posters, who support the parents

[Holly Goodhead]

I think the indicative word in your post is "respond".

I was quoting Davel: 

"Why bother... So if posters continually promote the alerts, as evidence then you think I shouldn't respond... This is a discussion forum....we, are here to discuss... If you don't like it don't discuss... But don't tell me not to post.. Simple".

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6106.msg543884#msg543884

Davel is not making the allegations many of which are of a pejorative nature ... he is responding.  So why single him out for criticism?

Sorry please explain?  I was merely responding to Davel's posts:

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6106.msg543881#msg543881

Where have I singled Davel out for criticism?

[Holly Goodhead]

What do you hope to acheive by posting...do you think you can help solve the case.. I think that's plain daft..
I post because I like a good argument. ...that's, all

Why do you believe it is daft that posters on an internet forum are unable to assist in solving cases?  What evidence do you have for this?

You might like a "good argument" but compared with other boards I've posted on the arguments here aren't good. 

What's your definition of a "good argument"?

[jassi]

What do you hope to acheive by posting...do you think you can help solve the case.. I think that's plain daft..
I post because I like a good argument. ...that's, all

You mean you are of an argumentative nature ?

[faithlilly]

I think the indicative word in your post is "respond".

Davel is not making the allegations many of which are of a pejorative nature ... he is responding.  So why single him out for criticism?

He is making allegations of a pejorative nature against Grime. How do you feel about that Brietta ?

[Brietta]

I was quoting Davel: 

"Why bother... So if posters continually promote the alerts, as evidence then you think I shouldn't respond... This is a discussion forum....we, are here to discuss... If you don't like it don't discuss... But don't tell me not to post.. Simple".

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6106.msg543884#msg543884

Sorry please explain?  I was merely responding to Davel's posts:

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6106.msg543881#msg543881

Where have I singled Davel out for criticism?

I think a lot comes down to a poster's objectives ie you claim some continually promote the alerts as evidence and you feel the need to want to respond by definition continually. 

What do you hope to achieve by this?
It's extremely unlikely you will convert those who you claim continually promote the alerts as evidence to your way of thinking. 
How does going round in circles assist with MM's disappearance? 
Do you think lawyers and forensic scientists believe there's any evidence against the McCanns? 
The fact that some posters on a forum or some other place think otherwise so what?   

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6106.msg543889#msg543889

Such is the nature of the "discussion" which has been taking place since Madeleine disappeared.  The name of the game is repetition and going round in circles.
As far as I know Davel is not producing videos and podcasts specifically to proselytize his opinions on others ... there are very many who do and in my opinion an intelligent well researched response to that is to be welcomed rather than despised.

[Brietta]

He is making allegations of a pejorative nature against Grime. How do you feel about that Brietta ?

Please be specific.

Show allegations which are false.  If true ... show in what way they are pejorative.  Thank you.

[Holly Goodhead]

I think a lot comes down to a poster's objectives ie you claim some continually promote the alerts as evidence and you feel the need to want to respond by definition continually. 

What do you hope to achieve by this?
It's extremely unlikely you will convert those who you claim continually promote the alerts as evidence to your way of thinking. 
How does going round in circles assist with MM's disappearance? 
Do you think lawyers and forensic scientists believe there's any evidence against the McCanns? 
The fact that some posters on a forum or some other place think otherwise so what?   

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6106.msg543889#msg543889

Such is the nature of the "discussion" which has been taking place since Madeleine disappeared.  The name of the game is repetition and going round in circles.
As far as I know Davel is not producing videos and podcasts specifically to proselytize his opinions on others ... there are very many who do and in my opinion an intelligent well researched response to that is to be welcomed rather than despised.

Are you able to link me to the videos and podcasts along with the intelligent and well researched responses?  Thanks.

[Mr Gray]

He is making allegations of a pejorative nature against Grime. How do you feel about that Brietta ?

Which allegations do you object to?.. I've simply quoted from reports.

[Brietta]

Are you able to link me to the videos and podcasts along with the intelligent and well researched responses?  Thanks.

Unfortunately I really do not have the vast amount of time required or a strong enough stomach to comply with that request.
My best advice to you would be to enter 'Madeleine McCann' into a search engine and and you will have access to all the links you require particularly the youtube ones.

[ShiningInLuz]

SIL - you said recently "Assuming this is correct, woke and wandered has become a tad less likely."  I don't see the logic building up to that conclusion.

For those wondering about the origin of this, it's the latest post on my blog.

I have been examining cadaver decomposition on the Algarve.  With a view to considering whether Madeleine woke, wandered, and met her end by accident or design.

There are vast tracts of undeveloped terrain inside and around Luz, and elsewhere, so I'm trying to understand what would happen to a body on the terrain surface, or in a shallow grave.

I was surprised to see that Gonçalo's cadaver find did not appear to be impacted by insects or larger scavengers.

From recent posts here, it seems many, most or all dogs would find a cadaver.  With a vast number of dogs on the Algarve, that means one aspect of W&W is less likely than I thought.

Clear as mud?   

[slartibartfast]

Please be specific.

Show allegations which are false.  If true ... show in what way they are pejorative.  Thank you.

Those will be the moderated ones.