Hiding a body in the hope it will be found.

[mercury]

You hide because you are cocky enough to think you can do it and get away with it. Look for a cocky suspect in this case.

There certainly was a very strutting rooster around from the beginning...calling the shots...quite embarrassing.....really

As to this wierd thread, many people hide bodies within a short distance, even in their own homes eg Tia Sharpes stepdad stuffed her in his loft....what a dumbass....whether they want to be found out is anyones guess...ie no one can know

[Brietta]

There certainly was a very strutting rooster around from the beginning...calling the shots...quite embarrassing.....really

As to this wierd thread, many people hide bodies within a short distance, even in their own homes eg Tia Sharpes stepdad stuffed her in his loft....what a dumbass....whether they want to be found out is anyones guess...ie no one can know

There's a thing ... I didn't think he was around from the beginning ... I thought he was at a dinner somewhere.

I don't think Tia's murderer wanted her body to be found ... ever;  he went to considerable lengths to conceal it.

[stephen25000]

You hide because you are cocky enough to think you can do it and get away with it. Look for a cocky suspect in this case.

Precisely.

It 's arrogance and the intent to deflect attention.

[G-Unit]

Let me save Alfie the bother. I believe that the body could have been concealed in a large municipal bin by one of the perpetrators connected to the disappearance. The body could have been concealed  there to create distance between the perpetrator and the crime. During the searches that intevitably followed the prepetrator I believe expected the body to be found. The blame for any injuries, sedation etc could then be levelled at an  'abductor'. Unfortunately the perpetrator did not know that the bins would be emptied before the body was found.

Does that mean the perp was hoping the body would be found though? I would see it more as a plan which worked whether or not the body was found. If it wasn't, body gone. If it was, finger pointing time.

[Lace]

Surely it would come down to why the child was abducted and murdered?    I don't think a child would be abducted just to be knocked on the head do you?

Therefore if a paedo abducted the child there would surely be DNA and it wouldn't be related to the McCann's.

[Eleanor]

The McCanns would hardly have hidden a body to be found, knowing as they would have done, about establishing the time of death.  All too easy if the body is found fairly quickly.

[Carana]

That's a very specific demand.  I can show you a case of a two year old British boy vanishing without trace from the home of his family in Greece, which is pretty close.  I can also show you the case of another young girl who vanished without trace not two years before Madeleine, from a location only a few miles from PdL.  Now, back to you - cases where bodies have been hidden with a specific intention of being discovered - don't have to be British, or three years old or on holiday to qualify.

The Aussie suitcase one that I mentioned earlier? The suitcase was dumped very far away though. That mystery is still ongoing.

[Alfred R Jones]

This thread doesn't make any sense. Why would you hide a body if you want it to be found? The reason you would hide is for it not to be found. A quickly found body can estimate time of death. Not too good for the perps if she was dead a while then you can  trace back to where she was at the time of death. Get Real Alfie.

I agree actually, no need to instruct ME to "get real" thanks!

[Alfred R Jones]

Tell me Alfie who are we to know what the person hiding the body's intention is ?

you seem to!

[G-Unit]

Yet Faithlilly has said that the McCann's hid Madeleine's body in a dumpster,   one of the first places the police would look I would assume.

Is it routine for the police to head for the dustbins when a child is reported missing then? I must have missed that.

[Alfred R Jones]

Is it routine for the police to head for the dustbins when a child is reported missing then? I must have missed that.

It is routing for police to look anywhere they think a child could be hiding or have been hidden I would think.  That might include easily accessible bins on walkways might it not?  Or are police not paid to think that far out of the box?

[Lace]

Is it routine for the police to head for the dustbins when a child is reported missing then? I must have missed that.

Obviously they don't head for dustbins,  but they would look in them as they moved through an area.

[faithlilly]

So far as I can fathom Faith's fantasy, it runs that the McCanns wanted her body to be found.

I am too busy preserving precious brain-cells to try to fathom why ....

Would you not want your daughter's body to be found, even if you  had contributed to the circumstances of her death ? Putting  the body in a place of concealment which the public had easy access to would almost ensure the body at some point would be found. The concealing and/or traces of sedation could be blamed on the 'abductor'. If an accident had happened while the parents were having dinner the PM would show the time of death was within the timescale the parents were claiming an abduction had taken place.

The only problem was a holidaymaker would not know that the bins were emptied in the early hours of the morning and the body disappeared before it had the chance to be found.

[Lace]

Would you not want your daughter's body to be found, even if you  had contributed to the circumstances of her death ? Putting  the body in a place of concealment which the public had easy access to would almost ensure the body at some point would be found. The concealing and/or traces of sedation could be blamed on the 'abductor'. If an accident had happened while the parents were having dinner the PM would show the time of death was within the timescale the parents were claiming an abduction had taken place.

The only problem was a holidaymaker would not know that the bins were emptied in the early hours of the morning and the body disappeared before it had the chance to be found.

Why would an abductor be blamed for a child being found with firstly a sedative,  so the abductor would have sedated her so that he could abduct her,  and secondly strangely a bang on the head???     Why would an abductor hit her on the head if he had already sedated her?    For what reason?   and for what reason would he be abducting her?   Surely an abductor would be abducting her if a paedophile sexual reasons, and so his DNA would be found  or if for ransom he would have taken her away same goes for handing her over for money.

[Alfred R Jones]

Why would an abductor be blamed for a child being found with firstly a sedative,  so the abductor would have sedated her so that he could abduct her,  and secondly strangely a bang on the head???     Why would an abductor hit her on the head if he had already sedated her?    For what reason?   and for what reason would he be abducting her?   Surely an abductor would be abducting her if a paedophile sexual reasons, and so his DNA would be found  or if for ransom he would have taken her away same goes for handing her over for money.

Yes, I asked this question earlier:

Say the reason for death was a bang on the head, and a post-mortem revealed some sort of sedative also.  Body found within yards of the place it was last seen.  How would this necessarily get the other occupants of the property off the hook as far as the police investigation is concerned?

No response.