Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3114892 times)

0 Members and 63 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2715 on: December 16, 2017, 09:57:51 AM »

no one has been arrested for blatantly obvious reasons I agree. whan I joined the thread this morning barrier was quoting Rowley and you were agreeing with Barrier...suddenly Rowley views are being down played

Then you need to read it again.

Rowley said to the effect multiple hypotheses.

i.e. they don't know what happened.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2716 on: December 16, 2017, 09:58:31 AM »
amaral was sacked from the investigation and the evidence he based his thesis on has been debunked#

Yet the bristish investigation team is more than happy with him.
Who debunked his thesis  some internet detective's?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2717 on: December 16, 2017, 09:59:03 AM »
Then you need to read it again.

Rowley said to the effect multiple hypotheses.

i.e. they don't know what happened.

so now again you beleive rowleys words...he also said the parents were not suspects and maddie was abducted..bye

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2718 on: December 16, 2017, 10:01:06 AM »
so now again you beleive rowleys words...he also said the parents were not suspects and maddie was abducted..bye

Rowley doesn't know what happened on May the 3 rd 2007.

« Last Edit: December 16, 2017, 10:13:44 AM by Eleanor »

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2719 on: December 16, 2017, 10:02:22 AM »
so now again you beleive rowleys words...he also said the parents were not suspects and maddie was abducted..bye

Cite for Rowley saying the parents aren't suspects,please.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Erngath

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2720 on: December 16, 2017, 10:04:44 AM »

Rowley doesn't know what happened on May the 3 rd 2007.



In your opinion.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2017, 10:15:46 AM by Eleanor »
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2721 on: December 16, 2017, 10:06:20 AM »
Yet the bristish investigation team is more than happy with him.
Who debunked his thesis  some internet detective's?

In Your Opinion.  I will be deleting comments that don't conform to The Rules of this Forum.  Thank you.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2722 on: December 16, 2017, 10:18:21 AM »

In your opinion.

He said multiple hypotheses, i.e. he doesn't know what happened, and nothing you can say will change that.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2723 on: December 16, 2017, 10:21:43 AM »
As a reminder, the thread title is Wandering off topic.

i.e. there is no specific matter being discussed, but instead a variety.

Offline jassi

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2724 on: December 16, 2017, 10:27:17 AM »
He said multiple hypotheses, i.e. he doesn't know what happened, and nothing you can say will change that.

Indeed. Rowley is a high ranking Metropolitan Police officer, well removed from the day to day investigation and as such  only knows what he has been told by subordinates.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Angelo222

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2725 on: December 16, 2017, 10:38:47 AM »
Indeed. Rowley is a high ranking Metropolitan Police officer, well removed from the day to day investigation and as such  only knows what he has been told by subordinates.

In my view, if the Met really had information about Maddie's disappearance the investigation would have been stepped up a gear instead of being wrapped up.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2017, 05:52:51 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2726 on: December 16, 2017, 10:44:25 AM »
In my view, if the Met really had information about Maddie's disappearance the investigation would have been stepped up a gear instead of being wrapped up.
That is possible.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2017, 05:53:35 PM by Angelo222 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2727 on: December 16, 2017, 10:55:04 AM »
Yet the bristish investigation team is more than happy with him.
Who debunked his thesis  some internet detective's?
In Your Opinion.  I will be deleting comments that don't conform to The Rules of this Forum.  Thank you.

Its not my opinion,its Rowleys,why else would he say he was happy with how the parents were dealt with in the initial investigation?

This is what he said,links have been provided multiple times.

 
Quote
Two points to that, firstly the involvement of the parents, that was dealt with at the time by the
original investigation by the Portuguese. We had a look at all the material and we are happy that was
all dealt with and there is no reason whatsoever to reopen that or start rumours that was a line of
investigation.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2017, 11:03:58 AM by barrier »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2728 on: December 16, 2017, 11:19:27 AM »
Its not my opinion,its Rowleys,why else would he say he was happy with how the parents were dealt with in the initial investigation?

This is what he said,links have been provided multiple times.

I dont think the UK investigation team are at all happy with amaral seeing as he was sacked for criticising them...imo. It was the team after amaral who decided the mccanns had no case to answer

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #2729 on: December 16, 2017, 11:30:06 AM »
I dont think the UK investigation team are at all happy with amaral seeing as he was sacked for criticising them...imo. It was the team after amaral who decided the mccanns had no case to answer

The team after Amaral, could not find evidence of anything to charge anyone.

Nothing has changed.