Wandering Off Topic

[Mr Gray]

It is immaterial, the PJ had suspicions and there were enough contradictions in statements for PJ to want to ask incriminating questions which required them being made arguidos.

The archiving report tells us the evidence used to make them arguidos and doesn't mention contradiction s in statements.... Again it seems the present investigations do not see the alleged contradictions as of any importance

[Carana]

It is immaterial, the PJ had suspicions and there were enough contradictions in statements for PJ to want to ask incriminating questions which required them being made arguidos.

I don't find it immaterial.

Until I, or some kind sould finds my post here from several years ago, I'll have to simply go from memory. A key difference in that legal article (at the time) was that the suspicion had to be founded (I can't remember the term used offhand, but IMO it clearly meant more than what could have been "interpreted" as sanctioning a fishing expedition, otherwise I can't see te purpose of having changed the phrasing.

The facts appear to be that:

- the McCanns stayed on beyond the expiry of their villa rental contract.
- the law was about to change.
- they were interviewed prior to that change.
- the PJ only had Lowe's email re the DNA results at the time.

[Carana]

Its a possibility Muriel Mckay was fed to pigs,so there is possibilty's it happens.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-17464298

No one has ever found a trace of that missing litttle girl.

No forensic evidence was ever found to substantiate that (IMO) wild theory.

If you haven't read the alleged "evidence" against that family... it really is one of the most bizarre trials that I've ever read about. And I do mean trial, not just the "investigation". How that case ever even got to trial is beyond my comprehension in the 21st century.

Whoever is guilty in that case, unless something new comes to light, I just can't see how justice has been done with respect to that little girl.

And, if those currently serving very long sentences are not in fact guilty, there's a predator out there who is free as a bird to prey again.

Whether there is any direct connection to Joana's disappearance, the sexual agressions against other girls in the area over a period of years and Maeleine's disappearance - I have no idea. I find it to be a possibility worthy of investigation, which may well be the final lead that SY (and possibly also the Porto PJ team) are pursuing.

[barrier]

No one has ever found a trace of that missing litttle girl.

No forensic evidence was ever found to substantiate that (IMO) wild theory.

So nothing to rule it out then.Pigs that is.

[barrier]

Whether there is any direct connection to Joana's disappearance, the sexual agressions against other girls in the area over a period of years and Maeleine's disappearance - I have no idea. I find it to be a possibility worthy of investigation, which may well be the final lead that SY (and possibly also the Porto PJ team) are pursuing.

There again it might not be,why speculate.

[Carana]

There again it might not be,why speculate.

Who's speculating? Surely it would be a legitimate  lead for the police to investigate whether 2 child disappearances and 12 sexual agressions (or potential ones) occurred in a relatively cliose proximity over a period of a few years could have a common connection?

Or do you think that such potential leads should be swept under the carpet and not investigated at all? If so, why?

[Vertigo Swirl]

So nothing to rule it out then.Pigs that is.

Nothing to rule out being fed to wild dogs, or the lions at Lisbon Zoo either.  Simply no evidence at all.

[Carana]

So nothing to rule it out then.Pigs that is.

No. But as substantiated as finding a UFO conspiracy theorist as a witness.

If there was no counter-evidence provided as to the lack of evidence of UFOs or the expert witness testimony, how can the jury contest it (their role is to come to a conclusion based on "facts" presented during the trial".

IMO.

[Carana]

Nothing to rule out being fed to wild dogs, or the lions at Lisbon Zoo either.  Simply no evidence at all.

Just saw this post. Snap.

[ShiningInLuz]

Read the archiving summarry.... All the evidence used to make them arguidis was not confirmed... It specifically  mentions the residues collected and sent to the FSS

Unless someone was psychic, the archiving summary is not relevant to the sequence of events leading to 7 Sep 2007.  The case was not archived then and no archiving summary existed.

You are at the wrong time on the wrong battleground.

[ShiningInLuz]

Nothing to rule out being fed to wild dogs, or the lions at Lisbon Zoo either.  Simply no evidence at all.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44332699
2 lions, 2 tigers, 1 jaguar and a bear have just escaped from a zoo in west Germany.

[Vertigo Swirl]

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44332699
2 lions, 2 tigers, 1 jaguar and a bear have just escaped from a zoo in west Germany.

ha, I just read that.  I wonder how many little kids they’ve snacked on so far...?

[Mr Gray]

Unless someone was psychic, the archiving summary is not relevant to the sequence of events leading to 7 Sep 2007.  The case was not archived then and no archiving summary existed.

You are at the wrong time on the wrong battleground.

The archiving report explained the basis on the evidence used to make them arguidos... Not sure why you are mentioning psychics

[John]

Memo:

A reminder to all posters to keep comments constructive and amicable. Attack opinion by all means but please do not make personal comments towards fellow members. This forum prides itself in allowing all shades of opinion so please bear this in mind when responding. TY and have a pleasant weekend.

[ShiningInLuz]

The archiving report explained the basis on the evidence used to make them arguidos... Not sure why you are mentioning psychics

No doubt you will quote the relevant part.