Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3145958 times)

0 Members and 53 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3075 on: June 01, 2018, 03:41:56 PM »
This is an example of the misinformation I was talking about.

If you have any evidence that the PJ knew of the date and content of these changes, it is time to provide it.

Unless Kate's book is wrong, Carlos Pinto de Abreu didn't see it coming and didn't forewarn the McCanns. And it was his job to know of such changes.

Otherwise your argument is speculation, pure and simple.
Are you seriously suggesting that the police would know nothing of a change to the law due to occur a mere couple of weeks later which would directly affect the way they handle suspects in the future? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Carana

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3076 on: June 01, 2018, 04:17:51 PM »
Are you seriously suggesting that the police would know nothing of a change to the law due to occur a mere couple of weeks later which would directly affect the way they handle suspects in the future?

That's what I was wondering. If the changes came as a last-minute surprise to the nation's entire criminal legal system, then there was a problem. IMO.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3077 on: June 01, 2018, 04:19:20 PM »
That's what I was wondering. If the changes came as a last-minute surprise to the nation's entire criminal legal system, then there was a problem. IMO.
It would certainly point to a highly disorganised system, if true.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Angelo222

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3078 on: June 01, 2018, 04:37:09 PM »
The fact is that sometimes an innocent person takes the right to silence

Cite for the innocent mother of a missing kid refusing police questions?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3079 on: June 01, 2018, 04:40:09 PM »
Cite for the innocent mother of a missing kid refusing police questions?

If you can point out where I have said that I will give you a cite

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3080 on: June 01, 2018, 04:59:59 PM »
Are you seriously suggesting that the police would know nothing of a change to the law due to occur a mere couple of weeks later which would directly affect the way they handle suspects in the future?
What difference does it make?

The McCanns had already announced their departure date.
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3081 on: June 01, 2018, 05:05:09 PM »
What difference does it make?

The McCanns had already announced their departure date.

It would certainly point to a highly disorganised system, if true.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3082 on: June 01, 2018, 05:43:03 PM »
What difference does it make?

The McCanns had already announced their departure date.
How did you work that out?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3083 on: June 01, 2018, 06:10:38 PM »
Innocent... Are you not aware

So how do you know?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3084 on: June 01, 2018, 06:17:30 PM »
How did you work that out?

It's in the book! Bob Small told the police they were leaving on 10th September.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3085 on: June 01, 2018, 06:24:33 PM »
It's in the book! Bob Small told the police they were leaving on 10th September.
So you believe Kate on that point.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3086 on: June 01, 2018, 06:59:22 PM »
So you believe Kate on that point.

Amaral said the same. Independent confirmation.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline John

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3087 on: June 01, 2018, 07:15:52 PM »
For the benefit of posters who didn't see this earlier:

A reminder to all posters to keep comments constructive and amicable. Attack opinion by all means but please do not make personal comments towards fellow members. This forum prides itself in allowing all shades of opinion so please bear this in mind when responding. TY and have a pleasant weekend.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3088 on: June 01, 2018, 09:03:24 PM »
Cite for the innocent mother of a missing kid refusing police questions?

You posted as fact that sometimes an innocent person takes the right to silence and by inference you implied that Kate McCann was such a person.  The McCann case aside, I asked you to cite an example of where the innocent mother of a missing child refused to cooperate with the police.  I think you will have trouble finding such an example because in the real world this just doesn't happen.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #3089 on: June 01, 2018, 09:07:09 PM »
You posted as fact that sometimes an innocent person takes the right to silence and by inference you implied that Kate McCann was such a person.  The McCann case aside, I asked you to cite an example of where the innocent mother of a missing child refused to cooperate with the police.  I think you will have trouble finding such an example because this just doesn't happen.

I didnt imply anything...I stated a fact...you made an incorrect inference...I stated that it is possible for an innocent person to take the right to silence...that is a fact. You are asking for a cite for something I didnt post