Wandering Off Topic

[kizzy]

I'm sure GA probably still does "believe in his belief" - but that is all he's got.  Belief, no evidence for it.

That's all you got ...beliefs - and no evidence for it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think you'll find that is untrue. There is lots of evidence around but no proof.

Not according to the archiving report which cited a lack of evidence against both the McCanns and Murat as the reasons for shelving the case and removing their arguido status.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That's all you got ...beliefs - and no evidence for it.

I'm happy with that - no one is hurt or damaged by my beliefs.

[jassi]

Hasn't he got another book up his sleeve?  After all Madeleine and her parents appear to be his main source of income these days.  Clinging on to his belief would be an essential prerequisite for his on-going career I would have thought.

I believe there was talk of one, but as nothing has materialised perhaps it was just idle gossip

[Vertigo Swirl]

I believe there was talk of one, but as nothing has materialised perhaps it was just idle gossip

Oh no, surely not?  What a pity, he did promise one was imminent. 

[Mr Gray]

I think you'll find that is untrue. There is lots of evidence around but no proof.

Not according to Pedro de Carmo
He has said clearly there is no evidence against the parents

[jassi]

Oh no, surely not?  What a pity, he did promise one was imminent.

I don't suppose it is of any real concern to many people

[Angelo222]

Not according to the archiving report which cited a lack of evidence against both the McCanns and Murat as the reasons for shelving the case and removing their arguido status.

You mean a deficiency in evidence, not an absence of it.  We know there is lots of evidence in this case which points to certain possibilities, it is the job of the professional investigators to unravel that evidence and make some sense of it.  To state that there is no evidence is incorrect.

[kizzy]

I'm happy with that - no one is hurt or damaged by my beliefs.

Wrong imo..it could damage what happened to maddie.

But your happy with that - in your words.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Wrong imo..it could damage what happened to maddie.

But your happy with that - in your words.

How exactly could my belief that Madeleine was abducted damage what happened to her? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

You mean a deficiency in evidence, not an absence of it.  We know there is lots of evidence in this case which points to certain possibilities, it is the job of the professional investigators to unravel that evidence and make some sense of it.  To state that there is no evidence is incorrect.

Is there evidence against Murat then?

[kizzy]

How exactly could my belief that Madeleine was abducted damage what happened to her?

Because we don't know she was imo abducted

[Vertigo Swirl]

Because we don't know she was imo abducted

But how specifically do my beliefs hurt a child that you (presumably) believe is long dead?

[Angelo222]

Is there evidence against Murat then?

Not that I'm aware of.  He was fully investigated and cooperated fully in that investigation.  An extensive search was carried out at his home in Luz and no incriminating material found.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't suppose it is of any real concern to many people

I'm sure you're spot on there - the only people who will be feeling a little let down and disappointed are his supporters I expect.