Wandering Off Topic

[Brietta]

With OG and the PJ allegedly looking at woke and wondered, present day doesn't even come into it,best add a imo I suppose

The problem as I see it is taking what suits from whatever a tabloid chooses to print without any provenance whatsoever;  or did I miss the information of "woke and wandered" released by the Judicial Police and Scotland Yard.

[barrier]

Allegedly


used to convey that something is claimed to be the case or have taken place, although there is no proof.

[Eleanor]

Allegedly


used to convey that something is claimed to be the case or have taken place, although there is no proof.

Could be a mistaken attempt to excuse Libel.

[Brietta]

People are going to talk about this and the parents behaviour wether you like it or not. You and the McCanns do not have control of peoples thoughts - censorship just doesn't work that way. It only makes those being censored more interesting and believed. And using this forum  as a personal punch bag to moan about it will not change a thing.

I am glad to say

I am sorry to say that I think you are correct that a rump of individuals will continue to discuss conspiracy theories on the internet whatever the outcome if any, of Madeleine's case should be.

I think though that the intense scrutiny of case material carried out by the Judicial Police and Scotland Yard started in 2010 and ending with enough evidence to allow the search for the miscreants who took her to be resumed in 2013 has largely drawn the poison from the sting of such conspiracy theorists.

[Brietta]

Allegedly


used to convey that something is claimed to be the case or have taken place, although there is no proof.

Yes I did notice your use of "allegedly" in justification of tabloid speculation ... don't you think it is terribly strange that the investigative authorities don't feature in either in their rehash or have made any comment before, during or since?

[Miss Taken Identity]

I am sorry to say that I think you are correct that a rump of individuals will continue to discuss conspiracy theories on the internet whatever the outcome if any, of Madeleine's case should be.

I think though that the intense scrutiny of case material carried out by the Judicial Police and Scotland Yard started in 2010 and ending with enough evidence to allow the search for the miscreants who took her to be resumed in 2013 has largely drawn the poison from the sting of such conspiracy theorists.

Ah, but I wasn't talking about the Bennetts and other loonie toons. I am talking about actual and factual reports which challenges  the parents version of accounts.  The parents and supporters have had free reign for too long- based on hysterical accounts by distraught parents- alledgedly. One minute they are too distraught, then years later they can't recall due to memory lapses, then they can recall other things without memory lapses.

As my gran would say *selective memory* The truth never changes- regardless of the winners and losers.

Aint that the truth!

[barrier]

Yes I did notice your use of "allegedly" in justification of tabloid speculation ... don't you think it is terribly strange that the investigative authorities don't feature in either in their rehash or have made any comment before, during or since?

Good to see there is a realisation that tabloid speculation is the last thing to be relied on for cites.

[Brietta]

Ah, but I wasn't talking about the Bennetts and other loonie toons. I am talking about actual and factual reports which challenges  the parents version of accounts.  The parents and supporters have had free reign for too long- based on hysterical accounts by distraught parents- alledgedly. One minute they are too distraught, then years later they can't recall due to memory lapses, then they can recall other things without memory lapses.

As my gran would say *selective memory* The truth never changes- regardless of the winners and losers.

Aint that the truth!

Do you seriously believe there are "winners and losers" in the games people play with their intrusion and obsession into the lives of others?

Of course the truth changes when all the information is considered and analysed.  The "100% DNA" truth rapidly becoming the lie when the forensic results were returned and properly understood being just one example.

[Brietta]

Good to see there is a realisation that tabloid speculation is the last thing to be relied on for cites.

I've known it for some time which is probably why I didn't fall for the tabloid headline I think you may have.

[barrier]

I don't fall for anything which is probably why I'm on a certain side of the fence.

[G-Unit]

Ah, but I wasn't talking about the Bennetts and other loonie toons. I am talking about actual and factual reports which challenges  the parents version of accounts.  The parents and supporters have had free reign for too long- based on hysterical accounts by distraught parents- alledgedly. One minute they are too distraught, then years later they can't recall due to memory lapses, then they can recall other things without memory lapses.

As my gran would say *selective memory* The truth never changes- regardless of the winners and losers.

Aint that the truth!

Or, despite being hysterical and non-functioning, they can assess the condition of a patient simply by laying hands on them in a dark room.

[slartibartfast]

Or, despite being hysterical and non-functioning, they can assess the condition of a patient simply by laying hands on them in a dark room.

That’s the problem with having to be all things to all arguments.

[faithlilly]

Could be she couldn't understand what Kate was trying to say,  and just said the twins were sleeping through the noise.

They didn't interview Kate the next day,  she was too traumatised,  which tells me she wasn't functioning at all.

I’ve a feeling I could show you footage of Kate not asking for help and you would still believe her.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I’m going to ask it again as it seems such an important issue, but - so what? Kate didn’t insist the twins were rushed to hospital.  What can we glean from this vital snippet on information which gets regurgitated with alarming regularity on this forum.  It’s obviously very relevant but why?

[Miss Taken Identity]

I’m going to ask it again as it seems such an important issue, but - so what? Kate didn’t insist the twins were rushed to hospital.  What can we glean from this vital snippet on information which gets regurgitated with alarming regularity on this forum.  It’s obviously very relevant but why?

It is all relevent to piece together the parents version of what may have happpened to their daughter. THEY seem to not want any other possible scenario to be looked at- even after no evidence of an stranger intruder carrying MBM away has been found!

And this is ofcourse a forum for MBM. Even though it smacks of PR for and on behalf of the Parents.