Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3154403 times)

0 Members and 106 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5415 on: May 17, 2019, 06:10:44 PM »
Yes, you're right, & apparently they refused to answer numerous questions they asked themselves  @)(++(*

Tis lost in translation.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5416 on: May 17, 2019, 06:14:04 PM »
I don't think he fits the descriptions given by the Smiths.
He looks just like one of the photofits. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5417 on: May 17, 2019, 06:33:42 PM »
He looks just like one of the photofits.


60/80% sure?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5418 on: May 17, 2019, 06:45:34 PM »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5419 on: May 17, 2019, 07:06:04 PM »
He looks just like one of the photofits.

But he's too tall and too chunky to fit the descriptions.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5420 on: May 17, 2019, 07:09:04 PM »
But he's too tall and too chunky to fit the descriptions.
How tall is he?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline misty

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5421 on: May 17, 2019, 07:11:38 PM »
But he's too tall and too chunky to fit the descriptions.

I don't recall DCI Redwood giving a description of Smithman's height & stature on Crimewatch 2013 (but I do agree 100% with your comment).

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5422 on: May 17, 2019, 07:34:14 PM »
I don't recall DCI Redwood giving a description of Smithman's height & stature on Crimewatch 2013 (but I do agree 100% with your comment).

Perhaps he didn't read the Smith statements.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline misty

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5423 on: May 17, 2019, 07:46:17 PM »
Perhaps he didn't read the Smith statements.

That would be rather remiss, given his appeal to an audience of millions to identify a man seen in Luz at 10pm on 3rd May 2007.

Offline misty

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5424 on: May 17, 2019, 08:21:37 PM »
But why specifically Cristowhatshisface ? Do you think he may have any more knowledge than say you or I and if so why ?

You can often judge a man by the company he keeps...
https://sicnoticias.pt/desporto/2019-05-17-Mustafa-em-prisao-preventiva-1

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5425 on: May 17, 2019, 09:47:02 PM »
That would be rather remiss, given his appeal to an audience of millions to identify a man seen in Luz at 10pm on 3rd May 2007.

Why didn't he give a full description I wonder?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline misty

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5426 on: May 17, 2019, 09:58:50 PM »
Why didn't he give a full description I wonder?

My opinion is he had a face for the 9.15pm Tanner sighting.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5427 on: May 18, 2019, 07:04:22 AM »
My opinion is he had a face for the 9.15pm Tanner sighting.

Why do his best to eliminate that sighting then?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline misty

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5428 on: May 20, 2019, 12:13:34 AM »
Why do his best to eliminate that sighting then?

I didn't hear ex-DCI Redwood say that Tannerman had been identified or eliminated. Did you?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #5429 on: May 20, 2019, 12:16:44 AM »
I didn't hear ex-DCI Redwood say that Tannerman had been identified or eliminated. Did you?

He said almost certain. What did you take that to mean ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?