Wandering Off Topic

[The General]

Really... So sil posts about a victim recovered by cadaver dogs.. You comment on the dogs... VS comments on the dogs... Holly comments on the dogs... And you think I'm the only one still talking about it... How long does that peyote last

You're still talking about it.......

[Vertigo Swirl]

You call it false alerts, I call it the dogs continuing to search until successful.
Her body may never have been found if it were not for the persistence of those good boys.

If in this case the dog had alerted to a spot where no body or evidence was found what would you call this?  A positive alert?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You're still talking about it.......

People still talk about the McCanns leaving their kids unattended - to what end exactly? WE KNOW ALREADY!

[Holly Goodhead]

Holly, this is all I could find.

Thanks.  Is this definitely for MW OC @ PDL 2007 season?  If so its clear the baby listening service is unavailable by its  absence.  Hence I guess the reason for the Paynes taking the monitor.

Are you able to upload a MW hol where the baby listening service is available so we can see how it is marketed?   

[The General]

People still talk about the McCanns leaving their kids unattended - to what end exactly? WE KNOW ALREADY!

He said he didn't want to talk about it. He's still talking about it. Now I'm talking about him not wanting to talk about it, but talking about it.

[Holly Goodhead]

People still talk about the McCanns leaving their kids unattended - to what end exactly? WE KNOW ALREADY!

Its factually correct and imo pivotal to the case.  The dog alerts as a stand alone are meaningless.

[The General]

If in this case the dog had alerted to a spot where no body or evidence was found what would you call this?  A positive alert?

I call that progress. Business as usual.
Same as a SOCO search. Dust for prints - none found - progress.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I call that progress. Business as usual.
Same as a SOCO search. Dust for prints - none found - progress.

*Itching to respond but won't*

[Vertigo Swirl]

Its factually correct and imo pivotal to the case.  The dog alerts as a stand alone are meaningless.

It's factually correct to state it, but it is never stated in a factual way, only in a judgey, sanctimonious what-shit-parents-I-would-never-let-the-children-out-of-my-sight-for-one-second way.  It gets tiresome, same way as discussing dogs get tiresome, but after 12 years what is left to say?  Heard back from the Met yet?

[Holly Goodhead]

It's factually correct to state it, but it is never stated in a factual way, only in a judgey, sanctimonious what-shit-parents-I-would-never-let-the-children-out-of-my-sight-for-one-second way.  It gets tiresome, same way as discussing dogs get tiresome, but after 12 years what is left to say?  Heard back from the Met yet?

Why would the MET keep me in the loop?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Why would the MET keep me in the loop?

Did they send you an acknowledgement or give you any indication at all that they are treating your theory seriously?  I mean if you've solved the case I think at the very least a "thank you" would be nice.

[Holly Goodhead]

Did they send you an acknowledgement or give you any indication at all that they are treating your theory seriously?  I mean if you've solved the case I think at the very least a "thank you" would be nice.

I said at the time I received an automated acknowledgement.  I might well receive a personal 'thank-you' if/when the case is solved. 

[Holly Goodhead]

I said at the time I received an automated acknowledgement.  I might well receive a personal 'thank-you' if/when the case is solved.

If I'm right it will be a huge embarrassment for the British police.

[Mr Gray]

If I'm right it will be a huge embarrassment for the British police.

I'm sure they are safe

[Holly Goodhead]

I'm sure they are safe

Oh so am I.  There are few organisations on planet earth that have been found guilty of so much but still walk away individually and collectively unscathed.