Wandering Off Topic

[The General]

Can you give examples of where my logic is way off please, or withdraw that assertion.   TY

No. CBA

[Mr Gray]

Now we have the inference that anyone who questions the McCann story is a bad parent. Well done for proving my point. 

Are you confusing infer with imply... Seeing as you criticised my English

[sadie]

Now we have the inference that anyone who questions the McCann story is a bad parent. Well done for proving my point. 

I dont mind reasonable questioning of The Mccanns .... but I do mind that some people on here think it is OK to give a crying child another wallop, to make sure he/she has something to cry about.

Call in the NSPCC


And I did not generalise to all sceptics, as you said.       I was specific to some of you.

Were you one of them that said that?  I think you were.   Please correct me if I am wrong.


More disinformation from you.  Can't you stop yourself ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

....and now you're at it. Using this heinous crime as a device to stomp on sceptics.
We get it, there's all sorts of crimes perpetrated in ways we can only imagine. Your logic is way off.
How about you personalise your message to the family verbatim? Then report back.

And by the way, to use the vernacular, Bruschetta has seen her arse and has seemingly decided to ignore my posts, having decided not to enter in to a conversation about her moderation of my posts. Which is fair enough. Nothing lost this side.

FFS.  When did you decide that "thoughts and prayers" were simply not enough for you in the Madeleine McCann case and that putting the boot in to her parents about this heinous crime was necessary instead?  What a hypocrite. 

[Lace]

Kinda ruled out an inside jobbie with no description of Jimmy abductor  wearing a uniform.

It doesn't rule out an inside job at all,  if the abductor wore a uniform and informed Madeleine he was taking her to her Mummy,  then passed her out to an accomplice.

Of course,  someone not working there could have got hold of a uniform.  IMO

[Vertigo Swirl]

Now we have the inference that anyone who questions the McCann story is a bad parent. Well done for proving my point. 

Which of course is nothing like the overt accusation that McCann supporters are child neglect apologists that we have had to put up with for over 12 years. 

[G-Unit]

I dont mind reasonable questioning of The Mccanns .... but I do mind that some people on here think it is OK to give a crying child another wallop, to make sure he/she has something to cry about.

Call in the NSPCC


And I did not generalise to all sceptics, as you said.       I was specific to some of you.

Were you one of them that said that?  I think you were.   Please correct me if I am wrong.


More disinformation from you.  Can't you stop yourself ?

Once again the accusations fly without a shred of evidence to support them. 

[jassi]

It doesn't rule out an inside job at all, if the abductor wore a uniform and informed Madeleine he was taking her to her Mummy,  then past her out to an accomplice.

Of course,  someone not working there could have got hold of a uniform.  IMO

More make-believe - nothing to support that  at all - IMO

[Holly Goodhead]

Can everyone cool it please and under no circumstances use foul language in a post directed at another poster even if the foul language is in abbreviated form. 

If I find myself having to micro-manage certain members because they choose to continually flout the rules I will make the case for temporary bans. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Can everyone cool it please and under no circumstances use foul language in a post directed at another poster even if the foul language is in abbreviated form. 

If I find myself having to micro-manage certain members because they choose to continually flout the rules I will make the case for temporary bans.

Is that aimed at me?  Perhaps you'd like to threaten the General too, who referred to Brietta as Bruschetta and used the "foul" term "arse" in his post.  I'm sure it would be most convenient to ban me seeing as how you're struggling to justify your continual misplaced scrutiny of innocent witnesses in this case.

[Holly Goodhead]

Is that aimed at me?  Perhaps you'd like to threaten the General too, who referred to Brietta as Bruschetta and used the "foul" term "arse" in his post.  I'm sure it would be most convenient to ban me seeing as how you're struggling to justify your continual misplaced scrutiny of innocent witnesses in this case.

Did I mention you?  No. 

Any further off-topic posts will be removed on sight.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Did I mention you?  No. 

Any further off-topic posts will be removed on sight.

Perhaps you’d like to clarify what topic we should be discussing on this thread then.

[Holly Goodhead]

Perhaps you’d like to clarify what topic we should be discussing on this thread then.

I think its self-explanatory. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think its self-explanatory.

Really?  So anymore off topic posts on the Off Topic thread will be deleted.  Perfect. 

[Holly Goodhead]

Really?  So anymore off topic posts on the Off Topic thread will be deleted.  Perfect.

Really?  No.

I was referring to the contents of your post challenging my post re moderation.

How many more times do you expect me to ask you nicely to contribute constructively?