Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3159372 times)

0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7185 on: December 25, 2019, 06:33:20 PM »

It's obvious the alerts are right though.

Unless, maybe Gilroy liked cleaning only his car boot & not the rest of his car.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7186 on: December 25, 2019, 06:35:50 PM »
It's obvious the alerts are right though.

Unless, maybe Gilroy liked cleaning only his car boot & not the rest of his car.

not according to the experts...in fact there was blood found in the boot but it wasnt Pilleys or Gilroys...

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7187 on: December 25, 2019, 06:39:41 PM »
not according to the experts...in fact there was blood found in the boot but it wasnt Pilleys or Gilroys...


I'm no expert, but I can guarantee Maddie won't be home by next christmas.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7188 on: December 25, 2019, 07:32:20 PM »
Just been listening to a new review of the Suzanne Pilley case.  It has professor John Cassella of Staffordshire University who is quite dismissive if the dog alerts and says they should not have been admitted as evidence.  It also says the SCRC ruled that the alerts should not have been admitted.  That's quite damning here to posters who still support the value of the alerts

For those who are not aware John Cassella is a colleague of Martin Grime

There was other evidence?

On 7 March 2012, a forensic pathologist, Dr Nathaniel Cary told the jury that David Gilroy had curved scratches on his hands a cut on his forehead, bruises on his chest and other scratches to his hands, wrist and forearms on 6 May 2010. A series of photographs were produced in court. He told the advocate depute that the scratches could have been caused by another person's fingernails, possibly in a struggle, and that this had happened around the time Ms Pilley went missing.

Suzanne Pilley put up a fight but the b........ still got her.

On 8 March 2012, the advocate depute led evidence from a Lothian and Borders Police constable who told the court how they partially traced a car journey David Gilroy made to Lochgilphead on 5 May 2010, using CCTV footage. After analysing the footage police recreated the journey there and back several times. They found that Mr Gilroy had taken 2 hours longer than their average time each way. Furthermore a comparison of fuel consumption suggested that 124 miles of Mr Gilroy's journey were unaccounted for.

Nothing to see here. Move on.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7189 on: December 25, 2019, 07:38:18 PM »
There was other evidence?

On 7 March 2012, a forensic pathologist, Dr Nathaniel Cary told the jury that David Gilroy had curved scratches on his hands a cut on his forehead, bruises on his chest and other scratches to his hands, wrist and forearms on 6 May 2010. A series of photographs were produced in court. He told the advocate depute that the scratches could have been caused by another person's fingernails, possibly in a struggle, and that this had happened around the time Ms Pilley went missing.

Suzanne Pilley put up a fight but the b........ still got her.

On 8 March 2012, the advocate depute led evidence from a Lothian and Borders Police constable who told the court how they partially traced a car journey David Gilroy made to Lochgilphead on 5 May 2010, using CCTV footage. After analysing the footage police recreated the journey there and back several times. They found that Mr Gilroy had taken 2 hours longer than their average time each way. Furthermore a comparison of fuel consumption suggested that 124 miles of Mr Gilroy's journey were unaccounted for.

Nothing to see here. Move on.

Ive already said there was other evidence... I'm just commenting on the inadmisibility of the alerts and the view if Prof Cassella.. Martin Grimes colleague

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7190 on: December 25, 2019, 08:08:26 PM »
Ive already said there was other evidence... I'm just commenting on the inadmisibility of the alerts and the view if Prof Cassella.. Martin Grimes colleague

Has he also cast doubt on the conviction of D'Andre Lane?

Maybe 2020 will be the year Bianca Jones abductors are caught & she turns up alive & well.

I wouldn't recommend holding your breath though.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7191 on: December 25, 2019, 08:28:58 PM »
Has he also cast doubt on the conviction of D'Andre Lane?

Maybe 2020 will be the year Bianca Jones abductors are caught & she turns up alive & well.

I wouldn't recommend holding your breath though.

He hasn't cast doubt on any conviction...he's, simply cast doubt on the, alerts

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7192 on: December 25, 2019, 08:39:40 PM »
He hasn't cast doubt on any conviction...he's, simply cast doubt on the, alerts

Bit of a coincidence though eh, woman goes missing, car boot smells of air freshener, cadaver dog alerts there.

Perhaps 2020 will be the year Suzanne Pilley turns up alive & well.

I wouldn't hold your breath though.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7193 on: December 25, 2019, 08:43:50 PM »
Bit of a coincidence though eh, woman goes missing, car boot smells of air freshener, cadaver dog alerts there.

Perhaps 2020 will be the year Suzanne Pilley turns up alive & well.

I wouldn't hold your breath though.

If they keep taking cadaver dogs to missing person scenes then the dogs have a good chance of getting some right.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7194 on: December 25, 2019, 08:48:12 PM »
Ive already said there was other evidence... I'm just commenting on the inadmisibility of the alerts and the view if Prof Cassella.. Martin Grimes colleague

Along with other evidence it suggests the dog was spot on and that will corroborate the dog alerts. He had 2 hours to hide the body very well.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7195 on: December 25, 2019, 08:54:19 PM »
Along with other evidence it suggests the dog was spot on and that will corroborate the dog alerts. He had 2 hours to hide the body very well.

Yes but the expert says....

Psssh...

Remind us how many missing persons have turned up alive following cadaver dog alerts?

It's one I think, maybe two, out of how many?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7196 on: December 25, 2019, 09:17:20 PM »
Yes but the expert says....

Psssh...

Remind us how many missing persons have turned up alive following cadaver dog alerts?

It's one I think, maybe two, out of how many?

Perhaps you can remind me how many times Eddie... The best cadaver dog in the world.... Actually found any evidence... I think it's two... Not bad for seven years work

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7197 on: December 25, 2019, 09:19:42 PM »
Perhaps you can remind me how many times Eddie... The best cadaver dog in the world.... Actually found any evidence... I think it's two... Not bad for seven years work

He's yet to be proven wrong in the Maddie case.

Any sign of Maddie being alive?

No?

Fancy that.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7198 on: December 25, 2019, 09:23:11 PM »
He's yet to be proven wrong in the Maddie case.

Any sign of Maddie being alive?

No?

Fancy that.

Just like the celestial teapot... Has anyone managed to prove it doesn't exist..

If Maddie did turn up... As Shannon Mathews did... The handler just comes up with another story...

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7199 on: December 25, 2019, 09:25:26 PM »
Please could Davel provide a link to this 'review' he was listening to?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0