Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3159322 times)

0 Members and 32 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7365 on: February 02, 2020, 02:14:27 PM »
Encarnacao and Neves were in charge, overseen by the Public Prosecutor and a judge. I think it's time to understand that 'Amaral being in charge' is a myth.

Yes ... we all know a big boy dunnit and ran away.  Which is not quite the impression conveyed within the pages of his book on the matter or in his many appearances on TV and print as the apparent 'expert' on Madeleine's case.

Wonder if he knows his away support are portraying him as the office boy ... I think he might find that at variance with his self image and honour.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7366 on: February 02, 2020, 02:19:22 PM »

Not sure what you mean by that = either age or knowledge.

But either way, you are wrong.
I assumed from your posts you were quite young, that is all.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7367 on: February 02, 2020, 03:09:55 PM »
Yes ... we all know a big boy dunnit and ran away.  Which is not quite the impression conveyed within the pages of his book on the matter or in his many appearances on TV and print as the apparent 'expert' on Madeleine's case.

Wonder if he knows his away support are portraying him as the office boy ... I think he might find that at variance with his self image and honour.


Well considering the support he got to fight the mcns in court - should tell you something.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7368 on: February 02, 2020, 03:14:42 PM »

Well considering the support he got to fight the mcns in court - should tell you something.

which is nothing compared to support the McCanns have received from the Uk public

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7369 on: February 02, 2020, 03:26:08 PM »
Yes ... we all know a big boy dunnit and ran away.  Which is not quite the impression conveyed within the pages of his book on the matter or in his many appearances on TV and print as the apparent 'expert' on Madeleine's case.

Wonder if he knows his away support are portraying him as the office boy ... I think he might find that at variance with his self image and honour.

Your hyperbole requires no rebuttal in my opinion.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7370 on: February 02, 2020, 04:00:38 PM »
which is nothing compared to support the McCanns have received from the Uk public

Which just goes to show how gullible the British public are.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7371 on: February 02, 2020, 04:04:24 PM »
which is nothing compared to support the McCanns have received from the Uk public



Think that was in the beginning - not so much now IMO

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7372 on: February 02, 2020, 04:07:13 PM »


Think that was in the beginning - not so much now IMO

All the UK media are supportive of the McCanns.

They'd be sued if they weren't though.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7373 on: February 02, 2020, 04:18:41 PM »


Think that was in the beginning - not so much now IMO
No far from just in the beginning...

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7374 on: February 02, 2020, 04:19:41 PM »
All the UK media are supportive of the McCanns.

They'd be sued if they weren't though.

The UK media can't tell lies... The Portuguese can it seems

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7375 on: February 02, 2020, 04:20:29 PM »
All the UK media are supportive of the McCanns.

They'd be sued if they weren't though.
What an idiotic statement.  Is there a law against being unsupportive now?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7376 on: February 02, 2020, 04:21:50 PM »
The UK media can't tell lies... The Portuguese can it seems

They can't risk questioning the McCanns version of events in fear of litigation imo

Things might be different when the McCanns are dead.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7377 on: February 02, 2020, 04:25:13 PM »
They can't risk questioning the McCanns version of events in fear of litigation imo

Things might be different when the McCanns are dead.

They can as long as they don't tell lies... You don't seem to understand it's that simple

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7378 on: February 02, 2020, 04:25:55 PM »
What an idiotic statement.  Is there a law against being unsupportive now?

How might the media go about being unsuportive of the McCanns IYO?

The BBC went so far as claiming Smith had changed his mind, before being pulled up over it.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #7379 on: February 02, 2020, 04:26:59 PM »
Which just goes to show how gullible the British public are.
I think the gullible ones are those that supported amaral