Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3028559 times)

0 Members and 87 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9075 on: December 08, 2020, 07:41:58 PM »
That's because they never had it... HcW may well have such evidence

There's no room for 'may', he has to have it, or he will be guilty of lying.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9076 on: December 08, 2020, 07:43:26 PM »
Didn't Amaral state it as a fact?

In public, when he was a serving police officer? Not to my knowledge.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9077 on: December 08, 2020, 07:48:19 PM »
There's no room for 'may', he has to have it, or he will be guilty of lying.

I dont see him lying so he must have it...thats that sorted

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9078 on: December 08, 2020, 07:54:45 PM »
I dont see him lying so he must have it...thats that sorted

I hope your belief in him is rewarded. I'll wait and see what he's got; if it's ever revealed.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9079 on: December 08, 2020, 07:56:30 PM »
I hope your belief in him is rewarded. I'll wait and see what he's got; if it's ever revealed.

I dont believe he would lie..I find it strange you think he would

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9080 on: December 08, 2020, 07:58:50 PM »
Why on earth would he lie?  Makes no sense.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9081 on: December 08, 2020, 08:05:11 PM »
It is strange how those that thought Madeleine had died way back in 2007 were pilloried and accused of being trolls, harming the search for the girl etc, now we have a German prosecutor telling us he believes she is dead and has the evidence that would have the brit public agree with it, and is  some one to be feted. Go figure.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9082 on: December 08, 2020, 08:07:37 PM »
It is strange how those that thought Madeleine had died way back in 2007 were pilloried and accused of being trolls, harming the search for the girl etc, now we have a German prosecutor telling us he believes she is dead and has the evidence that would have the brit public agree with it, and is  some one to be feted. Go figure.
13 years have passed

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9083 on: December 08, 2020, 08:10:29 PM »
It is strange how those that thought Madeleine had died way back in 2007 were pilloried and accused of being trolls, harming the search for the girl etc, now we have a German prosecutor telling us he believes she is dead and has the evidence that would have the brit public agree with it, and is  some one to be feted. Go figure.
Equally it is strange that those who were convinced Madeleine died in 2007 simply won’t countenance the idea that an investigation has uncovered concrete evidence to support their belief.  Go figure indeed.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9084 on: December 08, 2020, 08:48:35 PM »
I dont believe he would lie..I find it strange you think he would

Nevertheless you were cautious enough to say he 'may' have the evidence.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9085 on: December 08, 2020, 08:49:39 PM »
Nevertheless you were cautious enough to say he 'may' have the evidence.
no he didn’t.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9086 on: December 08, 2020, 08:52:58 PM »
Nevertheless you were cautious enough to say he 'may' have the evidence.

“ HcW may well have such evidence” Davel

Nothing ‘concrete’ there.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9087 on: December 08, 2020, 08:53:49 PM »
Equally it is strange that those who were convinced Madeleine died in 2007 simply won’t countenance the idea that an investigation has uncovered concrete evidence to support their belief.  Go figure indeed.

There are people who are quick to believe anything which supports their own opinions. There are others who prefer to examine the evidence underlying claims before accepting statements being made. For me, that applies to any statements whether they agree or disagree with my own opinions.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9088 on: December 08, 2020, 08:59:22 PM »
There are people who are quick to believe anything which supports their own opinions. There are others who prefer to examine the evidence underlying claims before accepting statements being made. For me, that applies to any statements whether they agree or disagree with my own opinions.

Like your belief  in the twice translated statements ..you haven't  even heard the evidence from HCW but you have dismissed  it
« Last Edit: December 08, 2020, 09:01:44 PM by Davel »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9089 on: December 08, 2020, 09:11:28 PM »
There are people who are quick to believe anything which supports their own opinions. There are others who prefer to examine the evidence underlying claims before accepting statements being made. For me, that applies to any statements whether they agree or disagree with my own opinions.
Yes dear, we know you think you’re rather superior in the critical thinking department  to the rest of us riff-raff but I think that’s simply rude, arrogant and inaccurate.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".