Wandering Off Topic

[Mr Gray]

That reminds me of the McCann v Amaral case. They clearly didn't like his opinion and he made no personal remarks about them imo.

He accused them of criminal acts. Can you not see that

[kizzy]

Imo neither of them are particularly bright... And that goes for those who support and follow their line of thought.

Well, that is just your opinion D a poster.

Whereas Pat Brown is a .sucsesfull (criminal profiler).

poster and those who follow your line of thought vs criminal profiler Pat Brown.

No contest really IMO who is the brightest.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well, that is just your opinion D a poster.

Whereas Pat Brown is a .sucsesfull (criminal profiler).

poster and those who follow your line of thought vs criminal profiler Pat Brown.

No contest really IMO who is the brightest.

Oh dear. 

[kizzy]

He accused them of criminal acts. Can you not see that

He accused them of criminal acts

Can you not see - he has not been proved wrong it seems.

[Vertigo Swirl]

He accused them of criminal acts

Can you not see - he has not been proved wrong it seems.

So are you saying it's ok to accuse anyone of criminal acts as long as you're never proven wrong?

[kizzy]

Oh dear. 

I know the feeling vs my reaction when I see posts about Wolt

[Angelo222]

Yep.  They put their heads above the parapet, they can expect to have them shot off.  Metaphorically speaking of course...

Did that go for Brenda too? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Did that go for Brenda too? 

Yup.

[kizzy]

So are you saying it's ok to accuse anyone of criminal acts as long as you're never proven wrong?

well we are not talking about anyone are we it's about GA who won the right to against the mccs

So seems it was ok for him to continue with what he believed happened. I M O

[Vertigo Swirl]

well we are not talking about anyone are we it's about GA who won the right to against the mccs

So seems it was ok for him to continue with what he believed happened. I M O

So you support the idea in principle then?  That's cool, you should have no issue with Wolters claiming Bruckner did it if he's never proven wrong then.

[Mr Gray]

Well, that is just your opinion D a poster.

Whereas Pat Brown is a .sucsesfull (criminal profiler).

poster and those who follow your line of thought vs criminal profiler Pat Brown.

No contest really IMO who is the brightest.

I havent seen any evidence of her success... You seem to accept it blindly. Let's see how bright and successful all these people look at the conclusion the case. They are going to look very foolish imo

[Mr Gray]

Did that go for Brenda too? 

Unfortunately yes. I do blame those for encouraging Brenda to a certain extent for what happened to her

[Eleanor]

I don't follow Pat Brown's career closely at all but I'm curious to know what successes she's had recently in her crime solving endeavours.  Anyone know?

She said herself that The FBI that she apparently trained didn't pay much if any attention to her.  Oh the ingratitude.

[Mr Gray]

well we are not talking about anyone are we it's about GA who won the right to against the mccs

So seems it was ok for him to continue with what he believed happened. I M O

You may have noticed he no longer repeats his claims.. Probably worried about the ECHR

[Eleanor]

Well, that is just your opinion D a poster.

Whereas Pat Brown is a .sucsesfull (criminal profiler).

poster and those who follow your line of thought vs criminal profiler Pat Brown.

No contest really IMO who is the brightest.

What exactly has Pat Brown successfully Profiled?