Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3008702 times)

0 Members and 114 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9525 on: February 21, 2021, 02:01:51 PM »
I think you need to read his book and watch the video. The investigation suspected them... Amaral said he could prove it... Can you really not see the difference. He also said things that were not in the files

He expressed his own opinions, as did the McCanns. Both claimed that the evidence supported their theories. Both said things that were not in the released files.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9526 on: February 21, 2021, 02:06:09 PM »
He expressed his own opinions, as did the McCanns. Both claimed that the evidence supported their theories. Both said things that were not in the released files.
Only Amaral pointed the finger at named individuals who have never been charged with any crime.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9527 on: February 21, 2021, 02:08:03 PM »
I havent seen any evidence of her success... You seem to accept it blindly. Let's see how bright and successful all these people look at the conclusion the case. They are going to look very foolish imo

Taking about blindly are you not doing the same with wolt who just rehashes all he says from the first time he made the appeal in June, yet has still hasn't produced any evidence. apart from words.

If there ever is a conclusion.

IYO they could look foolish -  IMO so could Wolt.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9528 on: February 21, 2021, 02:29:48 PM »
Only Amaral pointed the finger at named individuals who have never been charged with any crime.

Those named individuals could hardly name the 'they' who they claimed had taken Madeleine. Their whole theory relied upon that person or persons being strangers.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9529 on: February 21, 2021, 02:41:41 PM »
Those named individuals could hardly name the 'they' who they claimed had taken Madeleine. Their whole theory relied upon that person or persons being strangers.
She said, missing the point spectacularly.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Angelo222

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9530 on: February 21, 2021, 04:10:28 PM »
Taking about blindly are you not doing the same with wolt who just rehashes all he says from the first time he made the appeal in June, yet has still hasn't produced any evidence. apart from words.

If there ever is a conclusion.

IYO they could look foolish -  IMO so could Wolt.

He's looking foolish already. He thought that if he made a sensational reveal them everyone would come crawling out of the woodwork and incriminate Bruckner. It didn't happen?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9531 on: February 21, 2021, 04:14:52 PM »
He's looking foolish already. He thought that if he made a sensational reveal them everyone would come crawling out of the woodwork and incriminate Bruckner. It didn't happen?

He's got the evidence... You just can't accept it

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9532 on: February 21, 2021, 04:21:00 PM »
He's got the evidence... You just can't accept it

He, or anyone else including SY, the McCanns, the PJ, haven’t seen it.

If you believe something you can’t see, that’s simply blind faith.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9533 on: February 21, 2021, 04:32:30 PM »
He, or anyone else including SY, the McCanns, the PJ, haven’t seen it.

If you believe something you can’t see, that’s simply blind faith.
No its a matter of looking at the whole picture.. I think it's more blind faith by those saying he has nothing

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9534 on: February 21, 2021, 04:51:20 PM »
No its a matter of looking at the whole picture.. I think it's more blind faith by those saying he has nothing

But you can’t see the whole picture so at this point it’s blind faith that he has what he says he has.

Any comment SY’s denial that they failed to pass on any letters from the BKA with proof of Madeleine’s death to the parents?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9535 on: February 21, 2021, 04:55:14 PM »
But you can’t see the whole picture so at this point it’s blind faith that he has what he says he has.

Any comment SY’s denial that they failed to pass on any letters from the BKA with proof of Madeleine’s death to the parents?

There has never been any mention of proof of Madeleine’s death apart from Amaral... You need to have another think

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9536 on: February 21, 2021, 05:04:42 PM »
There has never been any mention of proof of Madeleine’s death apart from Amaral... You need to have another think

Semantics but do you think Madeleine’s parents will care whether Wolter has claimed he has evidence or proof that she is dead?

Any SY’s denial...do you believe them?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9537 on: February 21, 2021, 05:08:05 PM »
Semantics but do you think Madeleine’s parents will care whether Wolter has claimed he has evidence or proof that she is dead?

Any SY’s denial...do you believe them?

Im sure the parents do care... You would have to provide a precise cite as to what SY said if you want my opinion

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9538 on: February 21, 2021, 05:09:55 PM »
Im sure the parents do care... You would have to provide a precise cite as to what SY said if you want my opinion

I posted it last night but to save you searching.

Not what SY say.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8440359/Scotland-Yard-deny-theyve-failed-hand-letters-Madeleine-McCanns-parents.html

‘Amid the war of words between British and German police, a spokesman for the Met said this afternoon: 'The Met received one letter from the Bundeskriminalamt (BKA) on June 12, which was passed to the family.

'The letter did not state that there was evidence or proof that Madeleine is dead - the Met continue to investigate Madeleine’s disappearance as a missing person investigation. No letter has been received by the Met from the German prosecutor'.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9539 on: February 21, 2021, 05:10:47 PM »
From the McCanns 3rd June..

the search for Madeleine.

All we have ever wanted is to find her, uncover the truth and bring those responsible to justice. We will never give up hope of finding Madeleine alive but whatever the outcome may be, we need to know as we need to find peace.

Seems to me they accept she may not be alive