Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3155244 times)

0 Members and 74 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9570 on: February 22, 2021, 12:11:56 AM »
What is it trying to divert us from?

Amaral's version of events.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9571 on: February 22, 2021, 12:16:23 AM »
Amaral's version of events.

Well that worked well, didn’t it !
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Angelo222

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9572 on: February 22, 2021, 12:24:35 AM »
Well that worked well, didn’t it !

He hasn't been proven wrong yet.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9573 on: February 22, 2021, 12:32:25 AM »
He hasn't been proven wrong yet.

Indeed.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9574 on: February 22, 2021, 02:48:23 AM »
I assume that Colin Sutton told the truth when he said he was told by a senior officer that those chosen to work on Operation Grange would be told what they could look at and what they could not. The fact that he shared this information means that he believed that the officers of the Metropolitan Police could be given such instructions and would obey them.
I assume Colin Sutton spoke the truth in reference to Madeleine's disappearance ~

Lack of information released to public from Portuguese police

“There was no publicising the case from the local police, which is unheard of back home.

“The public assistance in a case like Madeleine’s would have been huge because of the emotive subject - a missing three-year-old girl. It defies belief that they did not publish e-fits once they had them.

“Their lack of PR explains why the McCanns were so pro-active on that front. They were trying to fill the vacuum.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/6-errors-madeleine-mccann-detectives-10272590
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9575 on: February 22, 2021, 02:58:13 AM »
I assume that Colin Sutton told the truth when he said he was told by a senior officer that those chosen to work on Operation Grange would be told what they could look at and what they could not. The fact that he shared this information means that he believed that the officers of the Metropolitan Police could be given such instructions and would obey them.

I assume Colin Sutton was speaking the truth when he says ~

House-to-house inquiries were haphazard and in some cases did not happen at all

“House-to-house, or in this case apartment-to-apartment, inquiries should have happened straight away. It is a simple case of knocking on doors and asking the occupants if they saw anything.

“If you’re on holiday and see a three-year-old girl wandering outside in her pyjamas, the natural thing is to bring her inside and figure out where she is from.

“For all the police knew, Madeleine could have been inside one of those apartments. But it takes lots of resources to do that. Because it was a holiday complex, it was the equivalent of knocking on as many doors as an entire housing estate in the UK.

“That takes the kind of manpower that would not have been immediately available to the Portuguese police.”

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/6-errors-madeleine-mccann-detectives-10272590


For example ~ "For all the police knew, Madeleine could have been inside one of those apartments." ~ did anyone ever find out who left the food to rot in the fridge at apartment 5J where two GNR dog teams showed great interest some days after Madeleine's disappearance, as noted by their handlers?

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9576 on: February 22, 2021, 05:58:56 AM »
How  do you account for the fact that they are not suspects then and that Operation Grange is pursuing abduction as their only line of enquiry?
With that you may have touched on the very reason after nigh on 14 yrs ,circa £12 million ,it's still unresolved.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9577 on: February 22, 2021, 07:09:12 AM »
Operation Grange are complying with their remit.
Who decided the remit and why?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9578 on: February 22, 2021, 07:10:59 AM »
Don't you realise by now that the SY investigation is a diversion. IMO.
Ooh, now this really does sound like some of you believe in a top level conspiracy!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9579 on: February 22, 2021, 07:13:20 AM »
With that you may have touched on the very reason after nigh on 14 yrs ,circa £12 million ,it's still unresolved.
Sometimes cases if abduction cannot be solved or take a long time to be solved.  Do you really think it would all have been done and dusted years ago if they’d gone after the McCanns instead?
« Last Edit: February 22, 2021, 07:29:30 AM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9580 on: February 22, 2021, 08:36:58 AM »
He hasn't been proven wrong yet.

Do you and others understand what a pathetic reply that is... A celestial teapot argument. A sure sign you've lost the argument. Remember Sadies theory that Maddies disappearance relates to her bloodline connection to Jesus hasn't been proved wrong either. All my opinion

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9581 on: February 22, 2021, 08:37:48 AM »
With that you may have touched on the very reason after nigh on 14 yrs ,circa £12 million ,it's still unresolved.

I think it is solved

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9582 on: February 22, 2021, 08:41:09 AM »
SY's theory that Maddie was abducted has not been proven wrong

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9583 on: February 22, 2021, 08:46:30 AM »
I think it is solved
In the end of the court trial then we might be able to say whether it was solved or not.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #9584 on: February 22, 2021, 08:50:52 AM »
In the end of the court trial then we might be able to say whether it was solved or not.
You have your opinion I have mine. To me everything points to the Germans having enough evidence to solve the case. Enough evidence to say Maddie was abducted and murdered but not quite enough at the moment to definitely prove who did it.. But enough evidence to suggest who did